口服头孢氨苄-克拉维酸、头孢呋辛和阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗牙科感染的效果:印度一项基于电子病历的真实世界回顾性研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x
Kalyan Banerjee, Ajay Kakkar, Kashif Ahmed Shamsi, Deepak Bansal, Priyesh Mathur, Nitin Madan Potode, Pankaj Pagariya, Sha Perveez Azher, Apurva Chaudhari, Ritu Mandal, Archana S Karadkhele, Neeraj Markandeywar, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Chintan Khandhedia, Amey Mane, Suyog Mehta, Sadhna Joglekar
{"title":"口服头孢氨苄-克拉维酸、头孢呋辛和阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗牙科感染的效果:印度一项基于电子病历的真实世界回顾性研究。","authors":"Kalyan Banerjee, Ajay Kakkar, Kashif Ahmed Shamsi, Deepak Bansal, Priyesh Mathur, Nitin Madan Potode, Pankaj Pagariya, Sha Perveez Azher, Apurva Chaudhari, Ritu Mandal, Archana S Karadkhele, Neeraj Markandeywar, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Chintan Khandhedia, Amey Mane, Suyog Mehta, Sadhna Joglekar","doi":"10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite multiple antibiotics being available to manage dental infections (DI), there is lack of data comparing commonly prescribed antibiotics in India.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cephalexin-clavulanic acid fixed-dose combination (cephalexin CV FDC) in contrast with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav FDC) and cefuroxime among patients with dental infections (odontogenic) in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-centric, observational, real-world electronic medical record (EMR)-based study was conducted between January 2022 and December 2022. The EMRs of 355 adults with DI receiving oral cephalexin CV, co-amoxiclav, or cefuroxime were categorized into two distinct groups: Group I (Test Group) with patients prescribed cephalexin extended release 375/750 mg along with clavulanic acid 125 mg; and Group II (Comparator Group) with patients prescribed co-amoxiclav 625 mg (500 mg amoxicillin + 125 mg clavulanic acid) or cefuroxime (250 mg/500 mg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toothache was the most common complaint, reported by 95.5% of patients, followed by swelling (46.8%), tooth sensitivity (35.5%), pus discharge (33.0%), redness and halitosis (30.4% each). Dental caries was observed in 81.1% of patients. Clinical improvement, defined as improvement/partial resolution of infection-related clinical signs and symptoms (composite measure of pain, swelling, fever, requirement of additional antimicrobial therapy) as per dentists' judgment, was recorded in 98.3% of patients with cephalexin CV, 96.8% of patients with co-amoxiclav, and 98.9% of patients treated with cefuroxime within 10 days. Time (days) to clinical improvement was numerically lesser among patients receiving cephalexin CV (4.6 ± 2.0) compared with cefuroxime (4.9 ± 2.1) and co-amoxiclav (5.0 ± 2.6). All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cephalexin CV was as effective as co-amoxiclav and cefuroxime, with faster clinical improvement and better resolution of certain symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Oral Cephalexin-Clavulanic Acid, Cefuroxime, and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid in the Management of Dental Infections: A Real-World, Retrospective, Electronic Medical Record-Based Study in India.\",\"authors\":\"Kalyan Banerjee, Ajay Kakkar, Kashif Ahmed Shamsi, Deepak Bansal, Priyesh Mathur, Nitin Madan Potode, Pankaj Pagariya, Sha Perveez Azher, Apurva Chaudhari, Ritu Mandal, Archana S Karadkhele, Neeraj Markandeywar, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Chintan Khandhedia, Amey Mane, Suyog Mehta, Sadhna Joglekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite multiple antibiotics being available to manage dental infections (DI), there is lack of data comparing commonly prescribed antibiotics in India.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cephalexin-clavulanic acid fixed-dose combination (cephalexin CV FDC) in contrast with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav FDC) and cefuroxime among patients with dental infections (odontogenic) in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-centric, observational, real-world electronic medical record (EMR)-based study was conducted between January 2022 and December 2022. The EMRs of 355 adults with DI receiving oral cephalexin CV, co-amoxiclav, or cefuroxime were categorized into two distinct groups: Group I (Test Group) with patients prescribed cephalexin extended release 375/750 mg along with clavulanic acid 125 mg; and Group II (Comparator Group) with patients prescribed co-amoxiclav 625 mg (500 mg amoxicillin + 125 mg clavulanic acid) or cefuroxime (250 mg/500 mg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toothache was the most common complaint, reported by 95.5% of patients, followed by swelling (46.8%), tooth sensitivity (35.5%), pus discharge (33.0%), redness and halitosis (30.4% each). Dental caries was observed in 81.1% of patients. Clinical improvement, defined as improvement/partial resolution of infection-related clinical signs and symptoms (composite measure of pain, swelling, fever, requirement of additional antimicrobial therapy) as per dentists' judgment, was recorded in 98.3% of patients with cephalexin CV, 96.8% of patients with co-amoxiclav, and 98.9% of patients treated with cefuroxime within 10 days. Time (days) to clinical improvement was numerically lesser among patients receiving cephalexin CV (4.6 ± 2.0) compared with cefuroxime (4.9 ± 2.1) and co-amoxiclav (5.0 ± 2.6). All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cephalexin CV was as effective as co-amoxiclav and cefuroxime, with faster clinical improvement and better resolution of certain symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs - Real World Outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs - Real World Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有多种抗生素可用于治疗牙科感染(DI),但在印度缺乏对常用处方抗生素进行比较的数据:本研究旨在评估头孢氨苄-克拉维酸固定剂量复方制剂(头孢氨苄 CV FDC)与阿莫西林-克拉维酸(共阿莫西林 FDC)和头孢呋辛在印度牙科感染(牙源性)患者中的实际有效性和耐受性:这项基于真实世界电子病历(EMR)的多中心回顾性观察研究于 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间进行。研究人员将接受头孢氨苄 CV、阿莫西林或头孢呋辛口服治疗的 355 名成人 DI 患者的电子病历分为两组:第一组(试验组)患者处方为头孢氨苄缓释片 375/750 毫克和克拉维酸 125 毫克;第二组(对比组)患者处方为氯阿莫西林 625 毫克(500 毫克阿莫西林+125 毫克克拉维酸)或头孢呋辛(250 毫克/500 毫克):牙痛是最常见的主诉,95.5%的患者有此症状,其次是肿胀(46.8%)、牙齿敏感(35.5%)、流脓(33.0%)、发红和口臭(各占 30.4%)。81.1%的患者出现龋齿。根据牙医的判断,在 10 天内,98.3% 的头孢菌素 CV 患者、96.8% 的联合阿莫西林患者和 98.9% 的头孢呋辛患者的感染相关临床症状和体征(疼痛、肿胀、发热、需要额外抗菌治疗等综合指标)得到改善/部分缓解,即临床好转。与头孢呋辛(4.9 ± 2.1)和联合阿莫西林(5.0 ± 2.6)相比,头孢呋辛 CV(4.6 ± 2.0)患者的临床症状改善时间(天数)较短。所有治疗的耐受性均良好:结论:头孢氨苄 CV 与 Coamoxiclav 和头孢呋辛的疗效相当,临床症状改善更快,某些症状缓解得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Oral Cephalexin-Clavulanic Acid, Cefuroxime, and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid in the Management of Dental Infections: A Real-World, Retrospective, Electronic Medical Record-Based Study in India.

Background: Despite multiple antibiotics being available to manage dental infections (DI), there is lack of data comparing commonly prescribed antibiotics in India.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cephalexin-clavulanic acid fixed-dose combination (cephalexin CV FDC) in contrast with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav FDC) and cefuroxime among patients with dental infections (odontogenic) in India.

Methods: This retrospective, multi-centric, observational, real-world electronic medical record (EMR)-based study was conducted between January 2022 and December 2022. The EMRs of 355 adults with DI receiving oral cephalexin CV, co-amoxiclav, or cefuroxime were categorized into two distinct groups: Group I (Test Group) with patients prescribed cephalexin extended release 375/750 mg along with clavulanic acid 125 mg; and Group II (Comparator Group) with patients prescribed co-amoxiclav 625 mg (500 mg amoxicillin + 125 mg clavulanic acid) or cefuroxime (250 mg/500 mg).

Results: Toothache was the most common complaint, reported by 95.5% of patients, followed by swelling (46.8%), tooth sensitivity (35.5%), pus discharge (33.0%), redness and halitosis (30.4% each). Dental caries was observed in 81.1% of patients. Clinical improvement, defined as improvement/partial resolution of infection-related clinical signs and symptoms (composite measure of pain, swelling, fever, requirement of additional antimicrobial therapy) as per dentists' judgment, was recorded in 98.3% of patients with cephalexin CV, 96.8% of patients with co-amoxiclav, and 98.9% of patients treated with cefuroxime within 10 days. Time (days) to clinical improvement was numerically lesser among patients receiving cephalexin CV (4.6 ± 2.0) compared with cefuroxime (4.9 ± 2.1) and co-amoxiclav (5.0 ± 2.6). All treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusion: Cephalexin CV was as effective as co-amoxiclav and cefuroxime, with faster clinical improvement and better resolution of certain symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信