潮气量膨胀性和通气效率是台湾男性慢性阻塞性肺病患者死亡率的预测因素:一项为期 10 年的随访研究 - V̇O2peak 或 FEV1% 是金标准吗?

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ming-Lung Chuang, Yu-Hsun Wang
{"title":"潮气量膨胀性和通气效率是台湾男性慢性阻塞性肺病患者死亡率的预测因素:一项为期 10 年的随访研究 - V̇O2peak 或 FEV1% 是金标准吗?","authors":"Ming-Lung Chuang, Yu-Hsun Wang","doi":"10.1177/14799731231220675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite our knowledge of the risk factors for mortality associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the mortality rate for this condition continues to increase. This study aimed to investigate the predictive power of physiological variables on all-cause mortality in COPD patients compared to peak oxygen uptake (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2peak</sub>) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>). We conducted a retrospective study of 182 COPD patients with complete lung function tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and survival data. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality. The median follow-up period was 6.8 (IQR 3.9-9.2) years. Out of the 182 patients in our study, sixty-two (34.1%) succumbed to various causes. Of these, 27.4% (<i>n</i> = 17) experienced acute exacerbations, 24.2% (<i>n</i> = 15) had advanced cancer, and 12.9% (<i>n</i> = 8) had cardiovascular disease as the primary cause of death. Another 25.8% (<i>n</i> = 16) passed away due to other underlying conditions, while 6.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) had an unknown cause of death. One patient's demise was attributed to a benign tumor, and another's to a connective tissue disease. The ratio of tidal volume to total lung capacity (V<sub>Tpeak</sub>/TLC) and the ratio of minute ventilation and <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> at nadir (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math><sub>E</sub>/<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2nadir</sub>) (AUR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.91) were superior predictors of all-cause mortality compared to <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2peak</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub>%. A mortality prediction formula was derived using these variables. This study highlights the potential of V<sub>Tpeak</sub>/TLC and <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math><sub>E</sub>/<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2nadir</sub> as predictive markers for COPD all-cause mortality in COPD. CPET is an effective tool for evaluating COPD mortality; however, the predictive equation requires further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"14799731231220675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tidal volume expandability and ventilatory efficiency as predictors of mortality in Taiwanese male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A 10-year follow-up study - Is V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> or FEV<sub>1</sub>% the gold standard?\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Lung Chuang, Yu-Hsun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731231220675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite our knowledge of the risk factors for mortality associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the mortality rate for this condition continues to increase. This study aimed to investigate the predictive power of physiological variables on all-cause mortality in COPD patients compared to peak oxygen uptake (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2peak</sub>) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>). We conducted a retrospective study of 182 COPD patients with complete lung function tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and survival data. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality. The median follow-up period was 6.8 (IQR 3.9-9.2) years. Out of the 182 patients in our study, sixty-two (34.1%) succumbed to various causes. Of these, 27.4% (<i>n</i> = 17) experienced acute exacerbations, 24.2% (<i>n</i> = 15) had advanced cancer, and 12.9% (<i>n</i> = 8) had cardiovascular disease as the primary cause of death. Another 25.8% (<i>n</i> = 16) passed away due to other underlying conditions, while 6.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) had an unknown cause of death. One patient's demise was attributed to a benign tumor, and another's to a connective tissue disease. The ratio of tidal volume to total lung capacity (V<sub>Tpeak</sub>/TLC) and the ratio of minute ventilation and <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> at nadir (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math><sub>E</sub>/<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2nadir</sub>) (AUR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.91) were superior predictors of all-cause mortality compared to <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2peak</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub>%. A mortality prediction formula was derived using these variables. This study highlights the potential of V<sub>Tpeak</sub>/TLC and <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math><sub>E</sub>/<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2nadir</sub> as predictive markers for COPD all-cause mortality in COPD. CPET is an effective tool for evaluating COPD mortality; however, the predictive equation requires further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"14799731231220675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722945/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231220675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231220675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管我们了解慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的相关死亡风险因素,但该病的死亡率仍在继续上升。本研究旨在探讨与摄氧量峰值(V˙O2peak)和一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)相比,生理变量对慢性阻塞性肺病患者全因死亡率的预测能力。我们对 182 名有完整肺功能测试、心肺运动测试(CPET)和生存数据的 COPD 患者进行了回顾性研究。采用 Cox 回归分析估算了全因死亡率的危险比。中位随访期为 6.8 年(IQR 3.9-9.2 年)。在我们研究的 182 名患者中,有 62 人(34.1%)死于各种原因。其中,27.4%的患者(17 人)死于急性病情加重,24.2%的患者(15 人)死于晚期癌症,12.9%的患者(8 人)死于心血管疾病。另有 25.8%(n = 16)的患者死于其他潜在疾病,6.5%(n = 4)的患者死因不明。一名患者的死因是良性肿瘤,另一名患者的死因是结缔组织疾病。潮气量与总肺活量的比值(VTpeak/TLC)和分钟通气量与 V˙O2(低点)的比值(V˙E/V˙O2nadir)(AUR 0.83,95% CI 0.76-0.91)与 V˙O2(低点)和 FEV1% 相比,更能预测全因死亡率。利用这些变量得出了死亡率预测公式。这项研究强调了 VTpeak/TLC 和 V˙E/V˙O2nadir作为 COPD 全因死亡率预测指标的潜力。CPET 是评估 COPD 死亡率的有效工具;然而,预测方程还需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tidal volume expandability and ventilatory efficiency as predictors of mortality in Taiwanese male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A 10-year follow-up study - Is V̇O2peak or FEV1% the gold standard?

Despite our knowledge of the risk factors for mortality associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the mortality rate for this condition continues to increase. This study aimed to investigate the predictive power of physiological variables on all-cause mortality in COPD patients compared to peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV1). We conducted a retrospective study of 182 COPD patients with complete lung function tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and survival data. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality. The median follow-up period was 6.8 (IQR 3.9-9.2) years. Out of the 182 patients in our study, sixty-two (34.1%) succumbed to various causes. Of these, 27.4% (n = 17) experienced acute exacerbations, 24.2% (n = 15) had advanced cancer, and 12.9% (n = 8) had cardiovascular disease as the primary cause of death. Another 25.8% (n = 16) passed away due to other underlying conditions, while 6.5% (n = 4) had an unknown cause of death. One patient's demise was attributed to a benign tumor, and another's to a connective tissue disease. The ratio of tidal volume to total lung capacity (VTpeak/TLC) and the ratio of minute ventilation and V˙O2 at nadir (V˙E/V˙O2nadir) (AUR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.91) were superior predictors of all-cause mortality compared to V˙O2peak and FEV1%. A mortality prediction formula was derived using these variables. This study highlights the potential of VTpeak/TLC and V˙E/V˙O2nadir as predictive markers for COPD all-cause mortality in COPD. CPET is an effective tool for evaluating COPD mortality; however, the predictive equation requires further validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信