多血管闭塞中风患者接受血管内治疗后的预后。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1177/23969873231216811
Natalie E LeCouffe, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Ivo Gh Jansen, Merel Boers, Henk A Marquering, Ludo Fm Beenen, Jelis Boiten, Wim H van Zwam, Lonneke Sf Yo, Charles Blm Majoie, Yvo Bwem Roos, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho
{"title":"多血管闭塞中风患者接受血管内治疗后的预后。","authors":"Natalie E LeCouffe, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Ivo Gh Jansen, Merel Boers, Henk A Marquering, Ludo Fm Beenen, Jelis Boiten, Wim H van Zwam, Lonneke Sf Yo, Charles Blm Majoie, Yvo Bwem Roos, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho","doi":"10.1177/23969873231216811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands (March 2014-November 2017). We included patients with an intracranial target occlusion in the anterior circulation. An MVO was defined as an MCA occlusion (M1/M2) or intracranial ICA/ICA-T occlusion, with a concurrent second occlusion in the ACA or PCA territory confirmed on baseline CTA. To compare outcomes, we performed a 10:1 propensity score matching analysis with a logistic regression model including potential confounders. Outcome measures included 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2946 included patients, 71 patients (2.4%) had an MVO (87% concurrent ACA occlusion, 10% PCA occlusion, 3% ⩾3 occlusions). These patients were matched to 71 non-MVO patients. Before matching, MVO patients had a higher baseline NIHSS (median 18 vs 16, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and worse collateral status (absent collaterals: 17% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to non-MVO patients. After matching, MVO patients had worse functional outcome at 90 days (median mRS 5 vs 3, cOR 0.39; 95%CI 0.25-0.62). Mortality was higher in MVO patients (46% vs 27%, OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.57).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>MVOs on baseline imaging were uncommon in LVO stroke patients undergoing EVT, but were associated with poor functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of patients with multivessel occlusion stroke after endovascular treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie E LeCouffe, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Ivo Gh Jansen, Merel Boers, Henk A Marquering, Ludo Fm Beenen, Jelis Boiten, Wim H van Zwam, Lonneke Sf Yo, Charles Blm Majoie, Yvo Bwem Roos, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969873231216811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands (March 2014-November 2017). We included patients with an intracranial target occlusion in the anterior circulation. An MVO was defined as an MCA occlusion (M1/M2) or intracranial ICA/ICA-T occlusion, with a concurrent second occlusion in the ACA or PCA territory confirmed on baseline CTA. To compare outcomes, we performed a 10:1 propensity score matching analysis with a logistic regression model including potential confounders. Outcome measures included 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2946 included patients, 71 patients (2.4%) had an MVO (87% concurrent ACA occlusion, 10% PCA occlusion, 3% ⩾3 occlusions). These patients were matched to 71 non-MVO patients. Before matching, MVO patients had a higher baseline NIHSS (median 18 vs 16, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and worse collateral status (absent collaterals: 17% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to non-MVO patients. After matching, MVO patients had worse functional outcome at 90 days (median mRS 5 vs 3, cOR 0.39; 95%CI 0.25-0.62). Mortality was higher in MVO patients (46% vs 27%, OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.57).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>MVOs on baseline imaging were uncommon in LVO stroke patients undergoing EVT, but were associated with poor functional outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231216811\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231216811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人们对接受血管内治疗(EVT)的大血管闭塞性卒中患者多血管闭塞(MVO)的影响知之甚少:我们报告了 MR CLEAN 注册中心的数据:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象是在荷兰接受 EVT 的所有中风患者(2014 年 3 月至 2017 年 11 月)。我们纳入了前循环颅内靶点闭塞的患者。MVO定义为MCA闭塞(M1/M2)或颅内ICA/ICA-T闭塞,基线CTA证实ACA或PCA区域同时存在第二个闭塞。为了比较结果,我们使用包括潜在混杂因素在内的逻辑回归模型进行了 10:1 倾向评分匹配分析。结果指标包括90天功能预后(改良Rankin量表,mRS)和死亡率:在纳入的 2946 名患者中,71 名患者(2.4%)患有 MVO(87% 并发 ACA 闭塞,10% 并发 PCA 闭塞,3% 并发 3 闭塞)。这些患者与 71 名非 MVO 患者进行了配对。配对前,MVO 患者的基线 NIHSS 较高(中位数为 18 vs 16,P = 0.001),侧支状态较差(无侧支:17% vs 6%,P 讨论和结论:在接受 EVT 的 LVO 卒中患者中,基线成像显示的 MVO 并不常见,但与不良的功能预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of patients with multivessel occlusion stroke after endovascular treatment.

Introduction: Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT).

Patients and methods: We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands (March 2014-November 2017). We included patients with an intracranial target occlusion in the anterior circulation. An MVO was defined as an MCA occlusion (M1/M2) or intracranial ICA/ICA-T occlusion, with a concurrent second occlusion in the ACA or PCA territory confirmed on baseline CTA. To compare outcomes, we performed a 10:1 propensity score matching analysis with a logistic regression model including potential confounders. Outcome measures included 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and mortality.

Results: Of 2946 included patients, 71 patients (2.4%) had an MVO (87% concurrent ACA occlusion, 10% PCA occlusion, 3% ⩾3 occlusions). These patients were matched to 71 non-MVO patients. Before matching, MVO patients had a higher baseline NIHSS (median 18 vs 16, p = 0.001) and worse collateral status (absent collaterals: 17% vs 6%, p < 0.001) compared to non-MVO patients. After matching, MVO patients had worse functional outcome at 90 days (median mRS 5 vs 3, cOR 0.39; 95%CI 0.25-0.62). Mortality was higher in MVO patients (46% vs 27%, OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.24-3.57).

Discussion and conclusion: MVOs on baseline imaging were uncommon in LVO stroke patients undergoing EVT, but were associated with poor functional outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信