强烈地磁暴期间全球电子含量与太阳和太阳风的相互作用

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
T.L. Gulyaeva
{"title":"强烈地磁暴期间全球电子含量与太阳和太阳风的相互作用","authors":"T.L. Gulyaeva","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2023.105830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Assessment of solar and solar wind parameters driving the ionosphere model is essential for prediction of the ionospheric weather. In the present paper impact of the different solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic parameters on the global electron content (</span><em>GEC</em><span>) during intense space weather storms is investigated. Hourly </span><em>GEC</em><span><span> values are calculated from JPL global maps of </span>total electron content GIM-TEC from 1995 to 2023. The sample comprises 90 intense storms from 1995 to 2023 associated with monthly peak of the weighted accumulation of the geomagnetic </span><em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em><span>) index exceeding 90 nT. The 27 day weighted accumulation of the solar sunspot numbers </span><em>SSN2</em>(<em>τ</em>), solar radio flux <em>F10.7</em>(<em>τ</em>), the solar hydrogen emission <em>Lyman</em>_<em>α</em>(<em>τ</em>) and the composite magnesium <em>MgII</em>(<em>τ</em>) indices are explored as precursors of <em>GEC</em><span> enhancements. As distinct from the positive ionosphere storm, the solar wind speed </span><em>Vsw</em>, the solar wind electric field <em>Ey</em>, merging electric field <em>Em</em> and <em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em>) indices proved to be effective as potential drivers of the negative <em>GEC</em> depletion. The positive and negative <em>dGEC</em> deviations from hourly GEC are produced by subtracting a quiet reference <em>GECav</em> averaged during 24h prior the storm normalized by <em>GECav</em>. The hourly storm profiles <em>Vsw(t)</em>, <em>Em(t)</em>, <em>Ey(t)</em>, <em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em>), <em>Dst(t)</em>, <em>GEC(t)</em> and <em>dGEC(t)</em> were reduced by method of superposed epochs. The zero epoch <em>t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> = 0 was taken at the peak <em>Apo*</em>(<em>τ, t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub>) and the storm time lasted for 48h from −12h prior <em>t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> and 35h afterwards. The best correlation of the positive storm <em>dGECp</em> amplitude is obtained with <em>MgII</em>(<em>τ</em>) and the negative storm <em>dGECn</em> with <em>E</em><sub><em>m</em></sub><em>*</em> and <em>Apo*</em>(<em>τ, t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub>) which are used to derive characteristics of five key points of storm-time <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) model: 1 – onset of the storm profile <em>t</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> = <em>t(dGECp)</em>; 2 – the amplitude <em>dGECp</em><sub><em>max</em></sub> and its time <em>t</em><sub><em>2</em></sub>(<em>dGECp</em><sub><em>max</em></sub>); 3 – the time of transition <em>t</em><sub><em>3</em></sub>(<em>dGEC</em> = 0) from the positive to negative (±) <em>GEC</em> storm; 4 – minimum negative disturbance <em>dGECn</em><sub><em>min</em></sub> and its time <em>t</em><sub><em>4</em></sub>(<em>dGECn</em><sub><em>min</em></sub>), 5 – the end of the storm profile <em>t</em><sub><em>5</em></sub>(<em>dGECn</em>). Analytical model of <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) is derived with Epstein step functions fitting 5 key points. Deviations <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) are inverted to <em>GEC</em>(<em>t</em>) using quiet reference pre-storm <em>GECav</em>. The model is validated for three intense storms on 26–28 February, 23–25 March and 23–25 April 2023. The results show improvement of <em>dGEC</em> forecast with RMS error reduced from 45 to 80% compared to results produced by the international reference ionosphere−plasmasphere model IRI-Plas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 105830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction of global electron content with the Sun and solar wind during intense geomagnetic storms\",\"authors\":\"T.L. Gulyaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pss.2023.105830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Assessment of solar and solar wind parameters driving the ionosphere model is essential for prediction of the ionospheric weather. In the present paper impact of the different solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic parameters on the global electron content (</span><em>GEC</em><span>) during intense space weather storms is investigated. Hourly </span><em>GEC</em><span><span> values are calculated from JPL global maps of </span>total electron content GIM-TEC from 1995 to 2023. The sample comprises 90 intense storms from 1995 to 2023 associated with monthly peak of the weighted accumulation of the geomagnetic </span><em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em><span>) index exceeding 90 nT. The 27 day weighted accumulation of the solar sunspot numbers </span><em>SSN2</em>(<em>τ</em>), solar radio flux <em>F10.7</em>(<em>τ</em>), the solar hydrogen emission <em>Lyman</em>_<em>α</em>(<em>τ</em>) and the composite magnesium <em>MgII</em>(<em>τ</em>) indices are explored as precursors of <em>GEC</em><span> enhancements. As distinct from the positive ionosphere storm, the solar wind speed </span><em>Vsw</em>, the solar wind electric field <em>Ey</em>, merging electric field <em>Em</em> and <em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em>) indices proved to be effective as potential drivers of the negative <em>GEC</em> depletion. The positive and negative <em>dGEC</em> deviations from hourly GEC are produced by subtracting a quiet reference <em>GECav</em> averaged during 24h prior the storm normalized by <em>GECav</em>. The hourly storm profiles <em>Vsw(t)</em>, <em>Em(t)</em>, <em>Ey(t)</em>, <em>Apo</em>(<em>τ, t</em>), <em>Dst(t)</em>, <em>GEC(t)</em> and <em>dGEC(t)</em> were reduced by method of superposed epochs. The zero epoch <em>t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> = 0 was taken at the peak <em>Apo*</em>(<em>τ, t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub>) and the storm time lasted for 48h from −12h prior <em>t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> and 35h afterwards. The best correlation of the positive storm <em>dGECp</em> amplitude is obtained with <em>MgII</em>(<em>τ</em>) and the negative storm <em>dGECn</em> with <em>E</em><sub><em>m</em></sub><em>*</em> and <em>Apo*</em>(<em>τ, t</em><sub><em>0</em></sub>) which are used to derive characteristics of five key points of storm-time <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) model: 1 – onset of the storm profile <em>t</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> = <em>t(dGECp)</em>; 2 – the amplitude <em>dGECp</em><sub><em>max</em></sub> and its time <em>t</em><sub><em>2</em></sub>(<em>dGECp</em><sub><em>max</em></sub>); 3 – the time of transition <em>t</em><sub><em>3</em></sub>(<em>dGEC</em> = 0) from the positive to negative (±) <em>GEC</em> storm; 4 – minimum negative disturbance <em>dGECn</em><sub><em>min</em></sub> and its time <em>t</em><sub><em>4</em></sub>(<em>dGECn</em><sub><em>min</em></sub>), 5 – the end of the storm profile <em>t</em><sub><em>5</em></sub>(<em>dGECn</em>). Analytical model of <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) is derived with Epstein step functions fitting 5 key points. Deviations <em>dGEC</em>(<em>t</em>) are inverted to <em>GEC</em>(<em>t</em>) using quiet reference pre-storm <em>GECav</em>. The model is validated for three intense storms on 26–28 February, 23–25 March and 23–25 April 2023. The results show improvement of <em>dGEC</em> forecast with RMS error reduced from 45 to 80% compared to results produced by the international reference ionosphere−plasmasphere model IRI-Plas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003206332300199X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003206332300199X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估驱动电离层模型的太阳和太阳风参数对于预测电离层天气至关重要。本文研究了强烈空间天气风暴期间不同的太阳、行星际和地磁参数对全球电子含量(GEC)的影响。每小时的 GEC 值是根据 JPL 1995 年至 2023 年全球电子总含量 GIM-TEC 地图计算得出的。样本包括 1995 年至 2023 年的 90 次强烈风暴,这些风暴的地磁 Apo(τ,t)指数加权累积月峰值超过 90 nT。太阳黑子数SSN2(τ)、太阳射电通量F10.7(τ)、太阳氢发射Lyman_α(τ)和复合镁MgII(τ)指数的27天加权累积被视为地磁增强的前兆。与正电离层风暴不同,太阳风速度 Vsw、太阳风电场 Ey、合并电场 Em 和 Apo(τ,t) 指数被证明是负 GEC 耗竭的潜在驱动因素。通过减去风暴前 24 小时平均的静态参考 GECav,并用 GECav 归一化,得出了与每小时 GEC 的正负 dGEC 偏差。每小时的风暴剖面 Vsw(t)、Em(t)、Ey(t)、Apo(τ, t)、Dst(t)、GEC(t)和 dGEC(t) 是通过叠加历元法还原的。零历元 t0 = 0 取自 Apo*(τ, t0) 峰值,风暴时间从 t0 之前的 -12 小时到之后的 35 小时,共持续 48 小时。正暴雨 dGECp 振幅与 MgII(τ)的相关性最好,负暴雨 dGECn 与 Em* 和 Apo*(τ,t0)的相关性最好:1 - 风暴剖面开始时间 t1 = t(dGECp);2 - 振幅 dGECpmax 及其时间 t2 (dGECpmax);3 - GEC 风暴从正向到负向(±)的过渡时间 t3(dGEC = 0);4 - 最小负扰动 dGECnmin 及其时间 t4 (dGECnmin);5 - 风暴剖面结束时间 t5(dGECn)。利用拟合 5 个关键点的 Epstein 阶跃函数推导出 dGEC(t) 的分析模型。偏差 dGEC(t) 利用风暴前的静态参考 GECav 反演为 GEC(t)。该模型对 2023 年 2 月 26-28 日、3 月 23-25 日和 4 月 23-25 日的三次强风暴进行了验证。结果表明,与国际参考电离层-等离子体模式 IRI-Plas 的结果相比,dGEC 的预报有所改进,均方根误差从 45% 减小到 80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interaction of global electron content with the Sun and solar wind during intense geomagnetic storms

Assessment of solar and solar wind parameters driving the ionosphere model is essential for prediction of the ionospheric weather. In the present paper impact of the different solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic parameters on the global electron content (GEC) during intense space weather storms is investigated. Hourly GEC values are calculated from JPL global maps of total electron content GIM-TEC from 1995 to 2023. The sample comprises 90 intense storms from 1995 to 2023 associated with monthly peak of the weighted accumulation of the geomagnetic Apo(τ, t) index exceeding 90 nT. The 27 day weighted accumulation of the solar sunspot numbers SSN2(τ), solar radio flux F10.7(τ), the solar hydrogen emission Lyman_α(τ) and the composite magnesium MgII(τ) indices are explored as precursors of GEC enhancements. As distinct from the positive ionosphere storm, the solar wind speed Vsw, the solar wind electric field Ey, merging electric field Em and Apo(τ, t) indices proved to be effective as potential drivers of the negative GEC depletion. The positive and negative dGEC deviations from hourly GEC are produced by subtracting a quiet reference GECav averaged during 24h prior the storm normalized by GECav. The hourly storm profiles Vsw(t), Em(t), Ey(t), Apo(τ, t), Dst(t), GEC(t) and dGEC(t) were reduced by method of superposed epochs. The zero epoch t0 = 0 was taken at the peak Apo*(τ, t0) and the storm time lasted for 48h from −12h prior t0 and 35h afterwards. The best correlation of the positive storm dGECp amplitude is obtained with MgII(τ) and the negative storm dGECn with Em* and Apo*(τ, t0) which are used to derive characteristics of five key points of storm-time dGEC(t) model: 1 – onset of the storm profile t1 = t(dGECp); 2 – the amplitude dGECpmax and its time t2(dGECpmax); 3 – the time of transition t3(dGEC = 0) from the positive to negative (±) GEC storm; 4 – minimum negative disturbance dGECnmin and its time t4(dGECnmin), 5 – the end of the storm profile t5(dGECn). Analytical model of dGEC(t) is derived with Epstein step functions fitting 5 key points. Deviations dGEC(t) are inverted to GEC(t) using quiet reference pre-storm GECav. The model is validated for three intense storms on 26–28 February, 23–25 March and 23–25 April 2023. The results show improvement of dGEC forecast with RMS error reduced from 45 to 80% compared to results produced by the international reference ionosphere−plasmasphere model IRI-Plas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planetary and Space Science
Planetary and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered: • Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics • Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system • Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating • Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements • Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation • Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites • Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind • Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations • Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets • History of planetary and space research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信