视障人士替代性辅助工具和技术回顾:最新进展与前景

IF 2.2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Zahra J. Muhsin, Rami Qahwaji, Faruque Ghanchi, Majid Al-Taee
{"title":"视障人士替代性辅助工具和技术回顾:最新进展与前景","authors":"Zahra J. Muhsin, Rami Qahwaji, Faruque Ghanchi, Majid Al-Taee","doi":"10.1007/s12193-023-00427-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of many tools and technologies for people with visual impairment has become a major priority in the field of assistive technology research. However, many of these technology advancements have limitations in terms of the human aspects of the user experience (e.g., usability, learnability, and time to user adaptation) as well as difficulties in translating research prototypes into production. Also, there was no clear distinction between the assistive aids of adults and children, as well as between “partial impairment” and “total blindness”. As a result of these limitations, the produced aids have not gained much popularity and the intended users are still hesitant to utilise them. This paper presents a comprehensive review of substitutive interventions that aid in adapting to vision loss, centred on laboratory research studies to assess user-system interaction and system validation. Depending on the primary cueing feedback signal offered to the user, these technology aids are categorized as visual, haptics, or auditory-based aids. The context of use, cueing feedback signals, and participation of visually impaired people in the evaluation are all considered while discussing these aids. Based on the findings, a set of recommendations is suggested to assist the scientific community in addressing persisting challenges and restrictions faced by both the totally blind and partially sighted people.</p>","PeriodicalId":17529,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of substitutive assistive tools and technologies for people with visual impairments: recent advancements and prospects\",\"authors\":\"Zahra J. Muhsin, Rami Qahwaji, Faruque Ghanchi, Majid Al-Taee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12193-023-00427-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The development of many tools and technologies for people with visual impairment has become a major priority in the field of assistive technology research. However, many of these technology advancements have limitations in terms of the human aspects of the user experience (e.g., usability, learnability, and time to user adaptation) as well as difficulties in translating research prototypes into production. Also, there was no clear distinction between the assistive aids of adults and children, as well as between “partial impairment” and “total blindness”. As a result of these limitations, the produced aids have not gained much popularity and the intended users are still hesitant to utilise them. This paper presents a comprehensive review of substitutive interventions that aid in adapting to vision loss, centred on laboratory research studies to assess user-system interaction and system validation. Depending on the primary cueing feedback signal offered to the user, these technology aids are categorized as visual, haptics, or auditory-based aids. The context of use, cueing feedback signals, and participation of visually impaired people in the evaluation are all considered while discussing these aids. Based on the findings, a set of recommendations is suggested to assist the scientific community in addressing persisting challenges and restrictions faced by both the totally blind and partially sighted people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-023-00427-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-023-00427-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为视力障碍者开发许多工具和技术已成为辅助技术研究领域的主要优先事项。然而,许多先进技术在用户体验的人性化方面(如可用性、可学习性和用户适应时间)存在局限性,而且在将研究原型转化为产品方面也存在困难。此外,成人和儿童的辅助工具之间,以及 "部分损伤 "和 "完全失明 "之间也没有明确的区别。由于这些局限性,生产出来的辅助工具并没有得到广泛的普及,目标用户仍然对使用这些辅助工具犹豫不决。本文全面回顾了有助于适应视力丧失的替代性干预措施,并以实验室研究为中心,评估了用户与系统的互动和系统验证。根据向用户提供的主要提示反馈信号,这些技术辅助工具可分为视觉、触觉或听觉辅助工具。在讨论这些辅助工具时,还考虑了使用环境、提示反馈信号和视障人士参与评估等因素。根据研究结果,提出了一系列建议,以帮助科学界应对全盲和弱视人士面临的长期挑战和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Review of substitutive assistive tools and technologies for people with visual impairments: recent advancements and prospects

Review of substitutive assistive tools and technologies for people with visual impairments: recent advancements and prospects

The development of many tools and technologies for people with visual impairment has become a major priority in the field of assistive technology research. However, many of these technology advancements have limitations in terms of the human aspects of the user experience (e.g., usability, learnability, and time to user adaptation) as well as difficulties in translating research prototypes into production. Also, there was no clear distinction between the assistive aids of adults and children, as well as between “partial impairment” and “total blindness”. As a result of these limitations, the produced aids have not gained much popularity and the intended users are still hesitant to utilise them. This paper presents a comprehensive review of substitutive interventions that aid in adapting to vision loss, centred on laboratory research studies to assess user-system interaction and system validation. Depending on the primary cueing feedback signal offered to the user, these technology aids are categorized as visual, haptics, or auditory-based aids. The context of use, cueing feedback signals, and participation of visually impaired people in the evaluation are all considered while discussing these aids. Based on the findings, a set of recommendations is suggested to assist the scientific community in addressing persisting challenges and restrictions faced by both the totally blind and partially sighted people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multimodal User Interfaces publishes work in the design, implementation and evaluation of multimodal interfaces. Research in the domain of multimodal interaction is by its very essence a multidisciplinary area involving several fields including signal processing, human-machine interaction, computer science, cognitive science and ergonomics. This journal focuses on multimodal interfaces involving advanced modalities, several modalities and their fusion, user-centric design, usability and architectural considerations. Use cases and descriptions of specific application areas are welcome including for example e-learning, assistance, serious games, affective and social computing, interaction with avatars and robots.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信