Hans Lynggaard Riis , Joan Chick , Alex Dunlop , David Tilly
{"title":"1.5 T MR-Linac 的质量保证","authors":"Hans Lynggaard Riis , Joan Chick , Alex Dunlop , David Tilly","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recent introduction of a commercial 1.5 T MR-linac system has considerably improved the image quality of the patient acquired in the treatment unit as well as enabling online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) treatment strategies. Quality Assurance (QA) of this new technology requires new methodology that allows for the high field MR in a linac environment. The presence of the magnetic field requires special attention to the phantoms, detectors, and tools to perform QA. Due to the design of the system, the integrated megavoltage imager (MVI) is essential for radiation beam calibrations and QA. Additionally, the alignment between the MR image system and the radiation isocenter must be checked. The MR-linac system has vendor-supplied phantoms for calibration and QA tests. However, users have developed their own routine QA systems to independently check that the machine is performing as required, as to ensure we are able to deliver the intended dose with sufficient certainty. The aim of this work is therefore to review the MR-linac specific QA procedures reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000668/pdfft?md5=02fca5601daf826c0cd75a54beaccb2e&pid=1-s2.0-S1053429623000668-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac\",\"authors\":\"Hans Lynggaard Riis , Joan Chick , Alex Dunlop , David Tilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The recent introduction of a commercial 1.5 T MR-linac system has considerably improved the image quality of the patient acquired in the treatment unit as well as enabling online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) treatment strategies. Quality Assurance (QA) of this new technology requires new methodology that allows for the high field MR in a linac environment. The presence of the magnetic field requires special attention to the phantoms, detectors, and tools to perform QA. Due to the design of the system, the integrated megavoltage imager (MVI) is essential for radiation beam calibrations and QA. Additionally, the alignment between the MR image system and the radiation isocenter must be checked. The MR-linac system has vendor-supplied phantoms for calibration and QA tests. However, users have developed their own routine QA systems to independently check that the machine is performing as required, as to ensure we are able to deliver the intended dose with sufficient certainty. The aim of this work is therefore to review the MR-linac specific QA procedures reported in the literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 120-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000668/pdfft?md5=02fca5601daf826c0cd75a54beaccb2e&pid=1-s2.0-S1053429623000668-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000668\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近引进的商用 1.5 T MR 直列加速器系统大大提高了治疗单元获取的患者图像质量,并使在线自适应放射治疗(oART)治疗策略成为可能。这一新技术的质量保证(QA)要求采用新方法,以便在直列加速器环境中进行高磁场 MR 扫描。磁场的存在要求特别关注模型、探测器和工具,以执行质量保证。由于系统的设计原因,集成的巨电压成像仪(MVI)对于辐射束校准和质量保证至关重要。此外,还必须检查磁共振成像系统与辐射等中心之间的对准情况。MR-linac 系统有供应商提供的用于校准和质量保证测试的模型。不过,用户也开发了自己的常规质量保证系统,以独立检查机器的性能是否符合要求,从而确保我们能够足够准确地提供预期剂量。因此,这项工作的目的是审查文献中报道的 MRlinac 特定质量保证程序。
The recent introduction of a commercial 1.5 T MR-linac system has considerably improved the image quality of the patient acquired in the treatment unit as well as enabling online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) treatment strategies. Quality Assurance (QA) of this new technology requires new methodology that allows for the high field MR in a linac environment. The presence of the magnetic field requires special attention to the phantoms, detectors, and tools to perform QA. Due to the design of the system, the integrated megavoltage imager (MVI) is essential for radiation beam calibrations and QA. Additionally, the alignment between the MR image system and the radiation isocenter must be checked. The MR-linac system has vendor-supplied phantoms for calibration and QA tests. However, users have developed their own routine QA systems to independently check that the machine is performing as required, as to ensure we are able to deliver the intended dose with sufficient certainty. The aim of this work is therefore to review the MR-linac specific QA procedures reported in the literature.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.