{"title":"审计监管能改善公司决策吗?披露涉税关键审计事项的证据","authors":"Lijun (Gillian) Lei, Sydney Qing Shu","doi":"10.1111/jbfa.12774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our study examines changes in corporate cash tax savings around the disclosure of tax-related key audit matters (tax KAMs). We expect publicly disclosed tax KAMs to increase the visibility of a firm's tax complexity and uncertainty, thereby motivating the firm to improve its tax function. In turn, we expect to observe increased cash tax savings as an outcome of improvements to corporate tax functions. As predicted, we document that firms exhibit lower cash effective tax rates in the period after their auditors disclose tax KAMs. Additional tests suggest that disclosure of tax KAMs does not increase the likelihood of firms being aggressive in cash tax planning and increased cash tax savings are primarily driven by firms that adjust toward their optimal levels of cash tax savings. Cross-sectional analyses support our expectation that post-disclosure increases in cash tax savings are less pronounced when investors were better informed about firms’ tax strategies in the pre-disclosure period and when firms faced stronger tax enforcement in the pre-disclosure period. Collectively, our results highlight the role of KAM disclosure requirements in prompting firms to improve their internal operational decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"51 7-8","pages":"2055-2092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does audit regulation improve corporate decision making? Evidence from the disclosure of tax-related key audit matters\",\"authors\":\"Lijun (Gillian) Lei, Sydney Qing Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbfa.12774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Our study examines changes in corporate cash tax savings around the disclosure of tax-related key audit matters (tax KAMs). We expect publicly disclosed tax KAMs to increase the visibility of a firm's tax complexity and uncertainty, thereby motivating the firm to improve its tax function. In turn, we expect to observe increased cash tax savings as an outcome of improvements to corporate tax functions. As predicted, we document that firms exhibit lower cash effective tax rates in the period after their auditors disclose tax KAMs. Additional tests suggest that disclosure of tax KAMs does not increase the likelihood of firms being aggressive in cash tax planning and increased cash tax savings are primarily driven by firms that adjust toward their optimal levels of cash tax savings. Cross-sectional analyses support our expectation that post-disclosure increases in cash tax savings are less pronounced when investors were better informed about firms’ tax strategies in the pre-disclosure period and when firms faced stronger tax enforcement in the pre-disclosure period. Collectively, our results highlight the role of KAM disclosure requirements in prompting firms to improve their internal operational decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"51 7-8\",\"pages\":\"2055-2092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12774\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的研究考察了与税务相关的关键审计事项(Tax KAMs)披露前后企业现金节税的变化。我们预计,公开披露的税务关键审计事项会提高公司税务复杂性和不确定性的能见度,从而促使公司改进其税务职能。反过来,我们预计企业税务职能的改进会带来更多的现金节税。正如所预测的那样,我们发现在审计师披露税务 KAM 后,企业的现金实际税率会降低。其他测试表明,披露税务 KAMs 并不会增加企业积极进行现金税收筹划的可能性,现金节税增加的主要原因是企业向其最佳现金节税水平进行了调整。横截面分析支持了我们的预期,即当投资者在披露前更了解企业的税务策略时,以及当企业在披露前面临更强的税收执法时,披露后现金节税的增加就不那么明显。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了 KAM 披露要求在促使企业改善内部运营决策方面的作用。
Does audit regulation improve corporate decision making? Evidence from the disclosure of tax-related key audit matters
Our study examines changes in corporate cash tax savings around the disclosure of tax-related key audit matters (tax KAMs). We expect publicly disclosed tax KAMs to increase the visibility of a firm's tax complexity and uncertainty, thereby motivating the firm to improve its tax function. In turn, we expect to observe increased cash tax savings as an outcome of improvements to corporate tax functions. As predicted, we document that firms exhibit lower cash effective tax rates in the period after their auditors disclose tax KAMs. Additional tests suggest that disclosure of tax KAMs does not increase the likelihood of firms being aggressive in cash tax planning and increased cash tax savings are primarily driven by firms that adjust toward their optimal levels of cash tax savings. Cross-sectional analyses support our expectation that post-disclosure increases in cash tax savings are less pronounced when investors were better informed about firms’ tax strategies in the pre-disclosure period and when firms faced stronger tax enforcement in the pre-disclosure period. Collectively, our results highlight the role of KAM disclosure requirements in prompting firms to improve their internal operational decisions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting exists to publish high quality research papers in accounting, corporate finance, corporate governance and their interfaces. The interfaces are relevant in many areas such as financial reporting and communication, valuation, financial performance measurement and managerial reward and control structures. A feature of JBFA is that it recognises that informational problems are pervasive in financial markets and business organisations, and that accounting plays an important role in resolving such problems. JBFA welcomes both theoretical and empirical contributions. Nonetheless, theoretical papers should yield novel testable implications, and empirical papers should be theoretically well-motivated. The Editors view accounting and finance as being closely related to economics and, as a consequence, papers submitted will often have theoretical motivations that are grounded in economics. JBFA, however, also seeks papers that complement economics-based theorising with theoretical developments originating in other social science disciplines or traditions. While many papers in JBFA use econometric or related empirical methods, the Editors also welcome contributions that use other empirical research methods. Although the scope of JBFA is broad, it is not a suitable outlet for highly abstract mathematical papers, or empirical papers with inadequate theoretical motivation. Also, papers that study asset pricing, or the operations of financial markets, should have direct implications for one or more of preparers, regulators, users of financial statements, and corporate financial decision makers, or at least should have implications for the development of future research relevant to such users.