OP85 泼尼松龙治疗儿童贝尔氏麻痹的成本效益:与随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xiuqin Xiong, Li Huang, David Herd, Meredith Borland, Andrew Davidson, Stephen Hearps, Mark Mackay, Katherine Lee, Stuart Dalziel, Kim Dalziel, John Cheek, Franz Babl
{"title":"OP85 泼尼松龙治疗儿童贝尔氏麻痹的成本效益:与随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估","authors":"Xiuqin Xiong, Li Huang, David Herd, Meredith Borland, Andrew Davidson, Stephen Hearps, Mark Mackay, Katherine Lee, Stuart Dalziel, Kim Dalziel, John Cheek, Franz Babl","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323001046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe cost effectiveness of treating Bell’s palsy with prednisolone in children is unknown. This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of prednisolone, compared with placebo, in treating Bell’s Palsy in children from a healthcare sector perspective.MethodsThis economic evaluation was a prospectively planned secondary analysis of a triple-blind randomized superiority trial conducted from 2015 to 2020 that compared prednisolone with placebo. The time horizon was six months after randomization. The 180 participants were aged from six months to 17 years and presented within 72 hours of onset of clinician diagnosed Bell’s palsy. Interventions were oral prednisolone (1 mg per kg daily) or taste-matched placebo administered for ten days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing prednisolone with placebo were estimated. Costs included medication costs, doctor visits, and medical tests over the six-month study period. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Nonparametric bootstrapping was performed to capture uncertainties. Prespecified subgroup analyses by age (12 to 17 years versus <12 years) were performed.ResultsThe mean cost per patient was USD188 in the prednisolone group and USD121 in the placebo group over the six-month period (difference USD66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 47, 179). The mean QALYs gained over six months were 0.45 in the prednisolone group and 0.44 in the placebo group (difference 0.01, 95%CI: -0.01, 0.03). Prednisolone was very likely cost effective given a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 50,000 per QALY gained (the cost per additional QALY gained was USD6,625 using prednisolone compared with placebo). Subgroup analysis suggested that this was primarily driven by the high probability of prednisolone being cost effective in children aged 12 to 17 years (98%), compared with those younger than 12 years (51%).ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence to stakeholders and policy makers who are considering whether to make prednisolone available for treating Bell’s palsy in children aged 12 to 17 years.","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OP85 Cost Effectiveness Of Prednisolone To Treat Bell’s Palsy In Children: An Economic Evaluation Alongside A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Xiuqin Xiong, Li Huang, David Herd, Meredith Borland, Andrew Davidson, Stephen Hearps, Mark Mackay, Katherine Lee, Stuart Dalziel, Kim Dalziel, John Cheek, Franz Babl\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266462323001046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionThe cost effectiveness of treating Bell’s palsy with prednisolone in children is unknown. This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of prednisolone, compared with placebo, in treating Bell’s Palsy in children from a healthcare sector perspective.MethodsThis economic evaluation was a prospectively planned secondary analysis of a triple-blind randomized superiority trial conducted from 2015 to 2020 that compared prednisolone with placebo. The time horizon was six months after randomization. The 180 participants were aged from six months to 17 years and presented within 72 hours of onset of clinician diagnosed Bell’s palsy. Interventions were oral prednisolone (1 mg per kg daily) or taste-matched placebo administered for ten days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing prednisolone with placebo were estimated. Costs included medication costs, doctor visits, and medical tests over the six-month study period. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Nonparametric bootstrapping was performed to capture uncertainties. Prespecified subgroup analyses by age (12 to 17 years versus <12 years) were performed.ResultsThe mean cost per patient was USD188 in the prednisolone group and USD121 in the placebo group over the six-month period (difference USD66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 47, 179). The mean QALYs gained over six months were 0.45 in the prednisolone group and 0.44 in the placebo group (difference 0.01, 95%CI: -0.01, 0.03). Prednisolone was very likely cost effective given a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 50,000 per QALY gained (the cost per additional QALY gained was USD6,625 using prednisolone compared with placebo). Subgroup analysis suggested that this was primarily driven by the high probability of prednisolone being cost effective in children aged 12 to 17 years (98%), compared with those younger than 12 years (51%).ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence to stakeholders and policy makers who are considering whether to make prednisolone available for treating Bell’s palsy in children aged 12 to 17 years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 用泼尼松龙治疗儿童贝尔氏麻痹的成本效益尚不清楚。本研究旨在从医疗保健部门的角度评估泼尼松龙与安慰剂相比治疗儿童贝尔氏麻痹的成本效益。方法本经济评估是对 2015 年至 2020 年进行的三盲随机优效试验进行的前瞻性二次分析,该试验将泼尼松龙与安慰剂进行了比较。时间跨度为随机化后六个月。180名参与者的年龄在6个月至17岁之间,在临床医生诊断为贝尔氏麻痹后72小时内发病。干预措施为口服泼尼松龙(每天每公斤 1 毫克)或口感匹配的安慰剂,连续用药十天。对泼尼松龙与安慰剂的增量成本效益比进行了估算。成本包括六个月研究期间的药费、就诊费用和医疗检查费用。疗效采用儿童健康效用 9D 工具得出的质量调整生命年(QALYs)进行衡量。为捕捉不确定性,进行了非参数自举分析。结果在6个月期间,泼尼松龙组每位患者的平均费用为188美元,安慰剂组为121美元(差异为66美元,95%置信区间[CI]:47, 179)。泼尼松龙组在 6 个月内获得的平均 QALY 为 0.45,安慰剂组为 0.44(差异为 0.01,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.01, 0.03)。按照每获得 1 QALY 50,000 美元的常规支付意愿阈值计算,泼尼松龙很可能具有成本效益(与安慰剂相比,使用泼尼松龙每增加 1 QALY 的成本为 6,625 美元)。亚组分析表明,这主要是由于泼尼松龙在 12-17 岁儿童中的成本效益概率较高(98%),而在 12 岁以下儿童中的成本效益概率较低(51%)。结论这项研究为正在考虑是否将泼尼松龙用于治疗 12-17 岁儿童贝尔氏麻痹的利益相关者和政策制定者提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OP85 Cost Effectiveness Of Prednisolone To Treat Bell’s Palsy In Children: An Economic Evaluation Alongside A Randomized Controlled Trial
IntroductionThe cost effectiveness of treating Bell’s palsy with prednisolone in children is unknown. This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of prednisolone, compared with placebo, in treating Bell’s Palsy in children from a healthcare sector perspective.MethodsThis economic evaluation was a prospectively planned secondary analysis of a triple-blind randomized superiority trial conducted from 2015 to 2020 that compared prednisolone with placebo. The time horizon was six months after randomization. The 180 participants were aged from six months to 17 years and presented within 72 hours of onset of clinician diagnosed Bell’s palsy. Interventions were oral prednisolone (1 mg per kg daily) or taste-matched placebo administered for ten days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing prednisolone with placebo were estimated. Costs included medication costs, doctor visits, and medical tests over the six-month study period. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Nonparametric bootstrapping was performed to capture uncertainties. Prespecified subgroup analyses by age (12 to 17 years versus <12 years) were performed.ResultsThe mean cost per patient was USD188 in the prednisolone group and USD121 in the placebo group over the six-month period (difference USD66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 47, 179). The mean QALYs gained over six months were 0.45 in the prednisolone group and 0.44 in the placebo group (difference 0.01, 95%CI: -0.01, 0.03). Prednisolone was very likely cost effective given a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 50,000 per QALY gained (the cost per additional QALY gained was USD6,625 using prednisolone compared with placebo). Subgroup analysis suggested that this was primarily driven by the high probability of prednisolone being cost effective in children aged 12 to 17 years (98%), compared with those younger than 12 years (51%).ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence to stakeholders and policy makers who are considering whether to make prednisolone available for treating Bell’s palsy in children aged 12 to 17 years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信