OP150 影响适当护理的政策杠杆盘点

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lindsey Warkentin, Lisa Tjosvold, Ken Bond
{"title":"OP150 影响适当护理的政策杠杆盘点","authors":"Lindsey Warkentin, Lisa Tjosvold, Ken Bond","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323001496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionHealthcare reform through appropriate care is a current focus for many jurisdictions. A variety of policy options, or “levers,” are available to decision makers to influence appropriate care. However, these levers are not always identified in advance of developing policy recommendations, and few direct, empirical analyses are available to support their selection. An appropriate care policy lever inventory was developed for health technology assessment (HTA) users in Alberta, Canada, to support HTA scoping and policy development.MethodsRelevant information was identified by a single reviewer through a scoping search of MEDLINE, forward and backward searching, and targeted gray literature searches. An Excel-based inventory was populated with a list of policy levers and their descriptions, policy effectiveness, and implementation considerations. Filters were developed to identify levers based on key characteristics. The inventory was iteratively refined through presentations to and feedback from key user groups.ResultsThe inventory contained 53 policy levers aiming to influence service provision, clinician behavior, fiscal policies, populations or organizations, and patient behavior. The levers varied in how they restrict decision-making. Few levers were considered high impact (>5% change to behavior, utilization, or cost) or well-supported (>10 studies reporting effectiveness). Stakeholders found the inventory information useful, particularly for considering potential levers not frequently utilized within their respective programs. A user guide and case examples were also developed to help users learn to navigate the inventory.ConclusionsAn inventory of policy levers, which can be tailored to specific clinical areas and topics, can be of assistance to healthcare decision makers developing and utilizing HTAs to improve appropriateness of care. With limited indication-specific evidence, policy makers must utilize the broader evidence base on appropriate care policy levers to select and implement strategies that are applicable and transferable to their context. Challenges remain in systematically identifying all relevant literature given the inventory’s breadth, and in updating the inventory to reflect new evidence.","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OP150 An Inventory Of Policy Levers For Influencing Appropriate Care\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey Warkentin, Lisa Tjosvold, Ken Bond\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266462323001496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionHealthcare reform through appropriate care is a current focus for many jurisdictions. A variety of policy options, or “levers,” are available to decision makers to influence appropriate care. However, these levers are not always identified in advance of developing policy recommendations, and few direct, empirical analyses are available to support their selection. An appropriate care policy lever inventory was developed for health technology assessment (HTA) users in Alberta, Canada, to support HTA scoping and policy development.MethodsRelevant information was identified by a single reviewer through a scoping search of MEDLINE, forward and backward searching, and targeted gray literature searches. An Excel-based inventory was populated with a list of policy levers and their descriptions, policy effectiveness, and implementation considerations. Filters were developed to identify levers based on key characteristics. The inventory was iteratively refined through presentations to and feedback from key user groups.ResultsThe inventory contained 53 policy levers aiming to influence service provision, clinician behavior, fiscal policies, populations or organizations, and patient behavior. The levers varied in how they restrict decision-making. Few levers were considered high impact (>5% change to behavior, utilization, or cost) or well-supported (>10 studies reporting effectiveness). Stakeholders found the inventory information useful, particularly for considering potential levers not frequently utilized within their respective programs. A user guide and case examples were also developed to help users learn to navigate the inventory.ConclusionsAn inventory of policy levers, which can be tailored to specific clinical areas and topics, can be of assistance to healthcare decision makers developing and utilizing HTAs to improve appropriateness of care. With limited indication-specific evidence, policy makers must utilize the broader evidence base on appropriate care policy levers to select and implement strategies that are applicable and transferable to their context. Challenges remain in systematically identifying all relevant literature given the inventory’s breadth, and in updating the inventory to reflect new evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:通过适当护理进行医疗改革是许多司法管辖区当前关注的焦点。决策者可利用各种政策选择或 "杠杆 "来影响适当护理。然而,这些杠杆并不总是在制定政策建议之前就被确定下来,而且很少有直接的实证分析来支持这些杠杆的选择。我们为加拿大艾伯塔省的健康技术评估(HTA)用户编制了一份适当护理政策杠杆清单,以支持健康技术评估的范围界定和政策制定。方法:相关信息由一名审查员通过对 MEDLINE 的范围检索、前向和后向检索以及有针对性的灰色文献检索来确定。在基于 Excel 的清单中列出了政策杠杆及其说明、政策效果和实施注意事项。根据关键特征开发了筛选器来识别杠杆。通过向主要用户群体的介绍和他们的反馈,该清单不断得到完善。结果该清单包含 53 个政策杠杆,旨在影响服务提供、临床医生行为、财政政策、人群或组织以及患者行为。这些杠杆对决策的限制程度各不相同。很少有政策杠杆被认为具有重大影响(对行为、利用率或成本的影响达到 5%)或得到充分支持(10 项研究报告了其有效性)。利益相关者认为清单信息非常有用,尤其是在考虑各自计划中不常用的潜在杠杆时。结论政策杠杆清单可针对特定的临床领域和主题量身定制,有助于医疗决策者开发和利用 HTA 来改善护理的适宜性。由于针对特定适应症的证据有限,决策者必须利用更广泛的适当护理政策杠杆证据库来选择和实施适用于其环境并可转移的策略。鉴于清单的广泛性,在系统识别所有相关文献以及更新清单以反映新证据方面仍存在挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OP150 An Inventory Of Policy Levers For Influencing Appropriate Care
IntroductionHealthcare reform through appropriate care is a current focus for many jurisdictions. A variety of policy options, or “levers,” are available to decision makers to influence appropriate care. However, these levers are not always identified in advance of developing policy recommendations, and few direct, empirical analyses are available to support their selection. An appropriate care policy lever inventory was developed for health technology assessment (HTA) users in Alberta, Canada, to support HTA scoping and policy development.MethodsRelevant information was identified by a single reviewer through a scoping search of MEDLINE, forward and backward searching, and targeted gray literature searches. An Excel-based inventory was populated with a list of policy levers and their descriptions, policy effectiveness, and implementation considerations. Filters were developed to identify levers based on key characteristics. The inventory was iteratively refined through presentations to and feedback from key user groups.ResultsThe inventory contained 53 policy levers aiming to influence service provision, clinician behavior, fiscal policies, populations or organizations, and patient behavior. The levers varied in how they restrict decision-making. Few levers were considered high impact (>5% change to behavior, utilization, or cost) or well-supported (>10 studies reporting effectiveness). Stakeholders found the inventory information useful, particularly for considering potential levers not frequently utilized within their respective programs. A user guide and case examples were also developed to help users learn to navigate the inventory.ConclusionsAn inventory of policy levers, which can be tailored to specific clinical areas and topics, can be of assistance to healthcare decision makers developing and utilizing HTAs to improve appropriateness of care. With limited indication-specific evidence, policy makers must utilize the broader evidence base on appropriate care policy levers to select and implement strategies that are applicable and transferable to their context. Challenges remain in systematically identifying all relevant literature given the inventory’s breadth, and in updating the inventory to reflect new evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信