{"title":"三本德语药理学教科书对过时药物利血平的介绍","authors":"Nikolas Misera, Roland Seifert","doi":"10.1007/s00210-023-02877-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For several decades, reserpine was used to treat hypertension and, to a limited extent, psychoses. Over time, however, the indication became more and more restricted to the point of obsolescence. This study examines the extent to which textbooks are up to date in their content and oriented towards therapeutic guidelines, using the obsolete drug reserpine as a paradigm. Three German pharmacology textbook series were examined for the coverage of reserpine from 1964-2023: <i>Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Aktories), <i>Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Karow) and <i>Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Lüllmann). We compared the textbook content with data on reserpine prescriptions and hypertension guidelines and analysed the relevance of reserpine in examinations using German federal exam questions by the Institute for medical and pharmaceutical exam questions (IMPP). The textbooks differ conceptually from each other. The indication of reserpine for hypertension has become more restricted over time in all three textbooks, yet they partially show discrepancies with hypertension guidelines. The reserpine prescription figures show a strong decline , and reserpine has not been queried by the IMPP, which underlines the obsolescence of the drug. Overall, our study shows that the presentation of a representative obsolete drug in pharmacology textbooks lags current medical practice. We also unmasked more differences in the presentation of an obsolete drug in standard textbooks than anticipated. In conclusion, the analysis of obsolete drugs in pharmacology textbooks is an informative way of assessing how up-to-date they are.</p>","PeriodicalId":18862,"journal":{"name":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presentation of the obsolete drug reserpine in three German-language pharmacology textbooks\",\"authors\":\"Nikolas Misera, Roland Seifert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00210-023-02877-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For several decades, reserpine was used to treat hypertension and, to a limited extent, psychoses. Over time, however, the indication became more and more restricted to the point of obsolescence. This study examines the extent to which textbooks are up to date in their content and oriented towards therapeutic guidelines, using the obsolete drug reserpine as a paradigm. Three German pharmacology textbook series were examined for the coverage of reserpine from 1964-2023: <i>Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Aktories), <i>Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Karow) and <i>Pharmakologie und Toxikologie</i> (Lüllmann). We compared the textbook content with data on reserpine prescriptions and hypertension guidelines and analysed the relevance of reserpine in examinations using German federal exam questions by the Institute for medical and pharmaceutical exam questions (IMPP). The textbooks differ conceptually from each other. The indication of reserpine for hypertension has become more restricted over time in all three textbooks, yet they partially show discrepancies with hypertension guidelines. The reserpine prescription figures show a strong decline , and reserpine has not been queried by the IMPP, which underlines the obsolescence of the drug. Overall, our study shows that the presentation of a representative obsolete drug in pharmacology textbooks lags current medical practice. We also unmasked more differences in the presentation of an obsolete drug in standard textbooks than anticipated. In conclusion, the analysis of obsolete drugs in pharmacology textbooks is an informative way of assessing how up-to-date they are.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02877-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02877-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
几十年来,利血平一直被用于治疗高血压,并在一定程度上用于治疗精神病。然而,随着时间的推移,其适应症越来越受到限制,甚至到了过时的地步。本研究以过时的药物利血平为范例,考察了教科书内容的更新程度和治疗指南的导向性。研究考察了 1964-2023 年间三套德国药理学教科书中有关利血平的内容:Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie》(Aktories)、《Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie》(Karow)和《Pharmakologie und Toxikologie》(Lüllmann)。我们将教科书的内容与利血平处方和高血压指南的数据进行了比较,并利用德国联邦医学和药学试题研究所(IMPP)的试题分析了利血平在考试中的相关性。这些教科书在概念上存在差异。随着时间的推移,三本教科书中对高血压的瑞格列汀适应症的限制越来越多,但它们与高血压指南存在部分差异。利血平的处方量大幅下降,而且利血平未被 IMPP 查询,这凸显了该药物的过时。总之,我们的研究表明,药理学教科书对代表性过时药物的介绍落后于当前的医疗实践。我们还发现,标准教科书在介绍过时药物方面的差异比预期的要大。总之,对药理学教科书中的过时药物进行分析是评估这些教科书是否与时俱进的一种有效方法。
Presentation of the obsolete drug reserpine in three German-language pharmacology textbooks
For several decades, reserpine was used to treat hypertension and, to a limited extent, psychoses. Over time, however, the indication became more and more restricted to the point of obsolescence. This study examines the extent to which textbooks are up to date in their content and oriented towards therapeutic guidelines, using the obsolete drug reserpine as a paradigm. Three German pharmacology textbook series were examined for the coverage of reserpine from 1964-2023: Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (Aktories), Allgemeine und Spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (Karow) and Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (Lüllmann). We compared the textbook content with data on reserpine prescriptions and hypertension guidelines and analysed the relevance of reserpine in examinations using German federal exam questions by the Institute for medical and pharmaceutical exam questions (IMPP). The textbooks differ conceptually from each other. The indication of reserpine for hypertension has become more restricted over time in all three textbooks, yet they partially show discrepancies with hypertension guidelines. The reserpine prescription figures show a strong decline , and reserpine has not been queried by the IMPP, which underlines the obsolescence of the drug. Overall, our study shows that the presentation of a representative obsolete drug in pharmacology textbooks lags current medical practice. We also unmasked more differences in the presentation of an obsolete drug in standard textbooks than anticipated. In conclusion, the analysis of obsolete drugs in pharmacology textbooks is an informative way of assessing how up-to-date they are.