总结 1QM

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Dead Sea Discoveries Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1163/15685179-bja10047

Michael B. Johnson

{"title":"总结 1QM","authors":"Michael B. Johnson","doi":"10.1163/15685179-bja10047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the debated placements of fragments in the reconstruction of the War Scroll from Cave 1 (1QM). There are three fragments (frags. 3, 9, 10) and one large fragment cluster (1QM 2, 8, DSSHU pl. 34; 1Q33 2) that are contested in 1QM scholarship. These placements are important for establishing the text of 1QM and the determination of whether there was another War Scroll from Cave 1 among the fragments assigned to 1QM and 1Q33. I will evaluate the remaining debates about fragment placements in 1QM, focusing especially on Hanan and Esther Eshel’s proposal (2000) that the large fragment cluster is not part of 1QM but is the remnant of a different scroll, which they label 1QMa. To assist in weighing the plausibility of fragment placements in 1QM, this article incorporates 3D visualizations of how 1QM would appear in a rolled state to demonstrate how well some proposed fragment placements cohere with the scroll’s damage patterns.","PeriodicalId":42669,"journal":{"name":"Dead Sea Discoveries","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wrapping Up 1QM\",\"authors\":\"Michael B. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685179-bja10047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article evaluates the debated placements of fragments in the reconstruction of the War Scroll from Cave 1 (1QM). There are three fragments (frags. 3, 9, 10) and one large fragment cluster (1QM 2, 8, DSSHU pl. 34; 1Q33 2) that are contested in 1QM scholarship. These placements are important for establishing the text of 1QM and the determination of whether there was another War Scroll from Cave 1 among the fragments assigned to 1QM and 1Q33. I will evaluate the remaining debates about fragment placements in 1QM, focusing especially on Hanan and Esther Eshel’s proposal (2000) that the large fragment cluster is not part of 1QM but is the remnant of a different scroll, which they label 1QMa. To assist in weighing the plausibility of fragment placements in 1QM, this article incorporates 3D visualizations of how 1QM would appear in a rolled state to demonstrate how well some proposed fragment placements cohere with the scroll’s damage patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dead Sea Discoveries\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dead Sea Discoveries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-bja10047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dead Sea Discoveries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-bja10047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了第 1 石窟（1QM）战争卷轴重建过程中碎片位置的争议。在 1QM 的学术研究中，有三个碎片（3、9、10 号碎片）和一个大型碎片集群（1QM 2、8 号碎片，DSSHU pl.34；1Q33 2）存在争议。这些位置对于确定 1QM 的文本以及确定在归入 1QM 和 1Q33 的残片中是否还有另一个来自第 1 石窟的战争卷轴非常重要。我将评估有关《1QM》中残片位置的其余争论，尤其关注哈南（Hanan）和埃斯特-埃舍尔（Esther Eshel）的提议（2000 年），即大型残片集群并非《1QM》的一部分，而是另一个卷轴的残卷，他们将其命名为《1QMa》。为了帮助权衡碎片在 1QM 中位置的合理性，本文结合了 1QM 在卷轴状态下的三维可视化效果，以展示一些碎片位置建议与卷轴损坏模式的吻合程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Wrapping Up 1QM

This article evaluates the debated placements of fragments in the reconstruction of the War Scroll from Cave 1 (1QM). There are three fragments (frags. 3, 9, 10) and one large fragment cluster (1QM 2, 8, DSSHU pl. 34; 1Q33 2) that are contested in 1QM scholarship. These placements are important for establishing the text of 1QM and the determination of whether there was another War Scroll from Cave 1 among the fragments assigned to 1QM and 1Q33. I will evaluate the remaining debates about fragment placements in 1QM, focusing especially on Hanan and Esther Eshel’s proposal (2000) that the large fragment cluster is not part of 1QM but is the remnant of a different scroll, which they label 1QMa. To assist in weighing the plausibility of fragment placements in 1QM, this article incorporates 3D visualizations of how 1QM would appear in a rolled state to demonstrate how well some proposed fragment placements cohere with the scroll’s damage patterns.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dead Sea Discoveries RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dead Sea Discoveries is an international journal dedicated to the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and associated literature. The journal is primarily devoted to the discussion of the significance of the finds in the Judean Desert for Biblical Studies, and the study of early Jewish and Christian history. Dead Sea Discoveries has established itself as an invaluable resource for the subject both in the private collections of professors and scholars as well as in the major research libraries of the world. ● Discussions on new discoveries from a wide variety of perspectives. ● Exchange of ideas among scholars from various disciplines. ● Thematic issues dedicated to particular texts or topics.