Covid-19 大流行期间英国高等教育界提供教学和研究的障碍

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rasha Kassem, Fotios Mitsakis
{"title":"Covid-19 大流行期间英国高等教育界提供教学和研究的障碍","authors":"Rasha Kassem, Fotios Mitsakis","doi":"10.1057/s41307-023-00333-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition to remote teaching in Higher Education (HE) institutions worldwide. Whilst there is existing research on the advantages and disadvantages of online teaching from transactional and adult learning theory perspectives, there is a lack of investigation into the specific challenges faced by academics in the UK HE sector concerning their teaching and research during the pandemic. This paper aims to fill this research gap by examining the experiences of nearly 300 academics in the UK HE sector through a qualitative online questionnaire. The findings of this study reveal several challenges associated with the sudden shift to online teaching. These challenges include time constraints, a lack of digital skills, technology issues, and an increased teaching workload. Academics also encountered difficulties engaging and connecting with students, as remote teaching created a sense of detachment between them. This finding aligns with the theoretical propositions of the self-determination theory, particularly regarding the sense of relatedness. Remote teaching presented obstacles in gauging students' reactions and understanding, as it lacked interactivity, personalisation, and the ability to keep students motivated and engaged. Additionally, academics faced issues assessing online assignments and monitoring students' progress and development. The isolation from remote work further contributed to a lack of concentration in teaching and research. The study also highlights the significant increase in teaching loads experienced by academics, as they had to adapt their teaching materials to suit the new mode of delivery. Academic research was impeded by limited access to labs, equipment, research time, and support due to the demands of teaching. Field-based research was put on hold, and many academics found collaborating with colleagues without physical proximity challenging. Considering these challenges, the study proposes ideas for overcoming barriers in future crisis events. The findings have implications for research and policy, further discussed in the paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"82 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Teaching and Research Provision in the UK Higher Education Sector During the Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Rasha Kassem, Fotios Mitsakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41307-023-00333-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition to remote teaching in Higher Education (HE) institutions worldwide. Whilst there is existing research on the advantages and disadvantages of online teaching from transactional and adult learning theory perspectives, there is a lack of investigation into the specific challenges faced by academics in the UK HE sector concerning their teaching and research during the pandemic. This paper aims to fill this research gap by examining the experiences of nearly 300 academics in the UK HE sector through a qualitative online questionnaire. The findings of this study reveal several challenges associated with the sudden shift to online teaching. These challenges include time constraints, a lack of digital skills, technology issues, and an increased teaching workload. Academics also encountered difficulties engaging and connecting with students, as remote teaching created a sense of detachment between them. This finding aligns with the theoretical propositions of the self-determination theory, particularly regarding the sense of relatedness. Remote teaching presented obstacles in gauging students' reactions and understanding, as it lacked interactivity, personalisation, and the ability to keep students motivated and engaged. Additionally, academics faced issues assessing online assignments and monitoring students' progress and development. The isolation from remote work further contributed to a lack of concentration in teaching and research. The study also highlights the significant increase in teaching loads experienced by academics, as they had to adapt their teaching materials to suit the new mode of delivery. Academic research was impeded by limited access to labs, equipment, research time, and support due to the demands of teaching. Field-based research was put on hold, and many academics found collaborating with colleagues without physical proximity challenging. Considering these challenges, the study proposes ideas for overcoming barriers in future crisis events. The findings have implications for research and policy, further discussed in the paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"volume\":\"82 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00333-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00333-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Covid-19 大流行病的爆发使得全球高等教育(HE)机构必须迅速过渡到远程教学。虽然已有研究从交易理论和成人学习理论的角度探讨了在线教学的利弊,但对英国高等教育领域的学者在大流行期间在教学和研究方面所面临的具体挑战却缺乏调查。本文旨在通过定性在线问卷调查英国高等教育界近 300 名学者的经历,填补这一研究空白。研究结果揭示了与突然转向在线教学相关的几个挑战。这些挑战包括时间限制、缺乏数字技能、技术问题以及教学工作量增加。由于远程教学造成了学生之间的疏离感,学者们在与学生接触和联系方面也遇到了困难。这一发现与自我决定理论的理论主张相吻合,尤其是在关联感方面。远程教学在衡量学生的反应和理解方面存在障碍,因为它缺乏互动性、个性化以及保持学生积极性和参与性的能力。此外,学者们在评估在线作业和监控学生的进步与发展方面也面临问题。远程工作带来的孤独感进一步导致教学和研究工作无法集中精力。研究还强调,学者们的教学工作量大幅增加,因为他们必须调整教材以适应新的授课模式。由于教学需要,学术研究受到实验室、设备、研究时间和支持的限制。基于实地的研究被搁置,许多学者发现与同事的合作并不容易。考虑到这些挑战,研究提出了在未来危机事件中克服障碍的想法。本文将进一步讨论研究结果对研究和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to Teaching and Research Provision in the UK Higher Education Sector During the Covid-19 Pandemic

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition to remote teaching in Higher Education (HE) institutions worldwide. Whilst there is existing research on the advantages and disadvantages of online teaching from transactional and adult learning theory perspectives, there is a lack of investigation into the specific challenges faced by academics in the UK HE sector concerning their teaching and research during the pandemic. This paper aims to fill this research gap by examining the experiences of nearly 300 academics in the UK HE sector through a qualitative online questionnaire. The findings of this study reveal several challenges associated with the sudden shift to online teaching. These challenges include time constraints, a lack of digital skills, technology issues, and an increased teaching workload. Academics also encountered difficulties engaging and connecting with students, as remote teaching created a sense of detachment between them. This finding aligns with the theoretical propositions of the self-determination theory, particularly regarding the sense of relatedness. Remote teaching presented obstacles in gauging students' reactions and understanding, as it lacked interactivity, personalisation, and the ability to keep students motivated and engaged. Additionally, academics faced issues assessing online assignments and monitoring students' progress and development. The isolation from remote work further contributed to a lack of concentration in teaching and research. The study also highlights the significant increase in teaching loads experienced by academics, as they had to adapt their teaching materials to suit the new mode of delivery. Academic research was impeded by limited access to labs, equipment, research time, and support due to the demands of teaching. Field-based research was put on hold, and many academics found collaborating with colleagues without physical proximity challenging. Considering these challenges, the study proposes ideas for overcoming barriers in future crisis events. The findings have implications for research and policy, further discussed in the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Policy
Higher Education Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy. The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome. Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信