可分性检验功率分析中结构矩阵之间的差异

IF 1.5 3区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Katarzyna Filipiak , Daniel Klein , Monika Mokrzycka
{"title":"可分性检验功率分析中结构矩阵之间的差异","authors":"Katarzyna Filipiak ,&nbsp;Daniel Klein ,&nbsp;Monika Mokrzycka","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2023.107907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>An important task in the analysis of multivariate data is testing of the </span>covariance matrix<span><span> structure. In particular, for assessing separability, various tests have been proposed. However, the development of a method of measuring discrepancy between two covariance matrix structures, in relation to the study of the power of the test, remains an open problem. Therefore, a </span>discrepancy measure is proposed such that for two arbitrary alternative hypotheses with the same value of discrepancy, the power of tests remains stable, while for increasing discrepancy the power increases. The basic hypothesis is related to the separable structure of the </span></span>observation matrix<span><span><span><span> under a doubly multivariate normal model, as assessed by the likelihood ratio and Rao score tests. It is shown that the particular one-parameter method and the </span>Frobenius norm fail in the power analysis of tests, while the entropy and </span>quadratic loss functions<span> can be efficiently used to measure the discrepancy between separable and non-separable covariance structures for a </span></span>multivariate normal distribution.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55225,"journal":{"name":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancy between structured matrices in the power analysis of a separability test\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Filipiak ,&nbsp;Daniel Klein ,&nbsp;Monika Mokrzycka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csda.2023.107907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>An important task in the analysis of multivariate data is testing of the </span>covariance matrix<span><span> structure. In particular, for assessing separability, various tests have been proposed. However, the development of a method of measuring discrepancy between two covariance matrix structures, in relation to the study of the power of the test, remains an open problem. Therefore, a </span>discrepancy measure is proposed such that for two arbitrary alternative hypotheses with the same value of discrepancy, the power of tests remains stable, while for increasing discrepancy the power increases. The basic hypothesis is related to the separable structure of the </span></span>observation matrix<span><span><span><span> under a doubly multivariate normal model, as assessed by the likelihood ratio and Rao score tests. It is shown that the particular one-parameter method and the </span>Frobenius norm fail in the power analysis of tests, while the entropy and </span>quadratic loss functions<span> can be efficiently used to measure the discrepancy between separable and non-separable covariance structures for a </span></span>multivariate normal distribution.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947323002189\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947323002189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多元数据分析中的一项重要任务是检验协方差矩阵结构。特别是在评估可分性方面,已经提出了各种检验方法。然而,如何开发一种方法来测量两个协方差矩阵结构之间的差异,从而研究检验的威力,仍然是一个有待解决的问题。因此,我们提出了一种差异度量方法,即对于差异值相同的两个任意替代假设,检验功率保持稳定,而对于差异值增大的假设,检验功率则会增大。基本假设与双多元正态模型下观察矩阵的可分离结构有关,可通过似然比和 Rao 分数检验进行评估。结果表明,特定的单参数方法和弗罗贝尼斯准则在检验功率分析中失效,而熵和二次损失函数可以有效地用于测量多元正态分布的可分离协方差结构和不可分离协方差结构之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepancy between structured matrices in the power analysis of a separability test

An important task in the analysis of multivariate data is testing of the covariance matrix structure. In particular, for assessing separability, various tests have been proposed. However, the development of a method of measuring discrepancy between two covariance matrix structures, in relation to the study of the power of the test, remains an open problem. Therefore, a discrepancy measure is proposed such that for two arbitrary alternative hypotheses with the same value of discrepancy, the power of tests remains stable, while for increasing discrepancy the power increases. The basic hypothesis is related to the separable structure of the observation matrix under a doubly multivariate normal model, as assessed by the likelihood ratio and Rao score tests. It is shown that the particular one-parameter method and the Frobenius norm fail in the power analysis of tests, while the entropy and quadratic loss functions can be efficiently used to measure the discrepancy between separable and non-separable covariance structures for a multivariate normal distribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 数学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (CSDA), an Official Publication of the network Computational and Methodological Statistics (CMStatistics) and of the International Association for Statistical Computing (IASC), is an international journal dedicated to the dissemination of methodological research and applications in the areas of computational statistics and data analysis. The journal consists of four refereed sections which are divided into the following subject areas: I) Computational Statistics - Manuscripts dealing with: 1) the explicit impact of computers on statistical methodology (e.g., Bayesian computing, bioinformatics,computer graphics, computer intensive inferential methods, data exploration, data mining, expert systems, heuristics, knowledge based systems, machine learning, neural networks, numerical and optimization methods, parallel computing, statistical databases, statistical systems), and 2) the development, evaluation and validation of statistical software and algorithms. Software and algorithms can be submitted with manuscripts and will be stored together with the online article. II) Statistical Methodology for Data Analysis - Manuscripts dealing with novel and original data analytical strategies and methodologies applied in biostatistics (design and analytic methods for clinical trials, epidemiological studies, statistical genetics, or genetic/environmental interactions), chemometrics, classification, data exploration, density estimation, design of experiments, environmetrics, education, image analysis, marketing, model free data exploration, pattern recognition, psychometrics, statistical physics, image processing, robust procedures. [...] III) Special Applications - [...] IV) Annals of Statistical Data Science [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信