{"title":"\"你的朋友,如果你有的话\":西尔维娅-比奇写给詹姆斯-乔伊斯的信》,Ruth Frehner 和 Ursula Zeller 编辑(评论)","authors":"Miranda Dunham-Hickman","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a914629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>“Your Friend If Ever You Had One”: The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce</em> ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Miranda Dunham-Hickman (bio) </li> </ul> <em>“YOUR FRIEND IF EVER YOU HAD ONE”: THE LETTERS OF SYLVIA BEACH TO JAMES JOYCE</em>, edited by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2021), xxxiv + 329 pp. $146.00 cloth, ebook. <p><strong>T</strong>his astutely annotated volume at last provides a robust capture of the other side of the correspondence published in 1987 by editors Melissa Banta and Oscar A. Silverman, <em>James Joyce’s Letters to Sylvia Beach, 1921–1940</em>.<sup>1</sup> “<em>Your Friend If Ever You Had One</em>,” housing letters from Beach to both Joyce and, starting in the 1930s, Paul Léon—Beach’s successor in the informal role of Joyce’s secretary and administrator—is a windfall made possible in large part through a bequest from Hans E. Jahnke, stepson to Joyce’s son Giorgio. Roughly three-quarters of these letters derive from this donation, with additional letters supplied to round out the collection from the University at Buffalo, the National Library of Ireland, and Princeton University. <strong>[End Page 632]</strong> Of the edition’s 145 letters, 131 are published for the first time. The compilation offers a vivid portrait in letters of Beach, the owner of the famous Parisian bookshop Shakespeare and Company, tracing her evolving working relationship with Joyce through its periods of flourishing, tension, and eventual diminution in the 1930s, as Beach ceded her place as Joyce’s primary assistant to Léon.</p> <p>The moment of the earlier Banta and Silverman correspondence indicates a context important to discerning the significance of this new collection. Around 1990, just before the emergence of the New Modernist Studies, scholarly attention increasingly turned to the cultural workers who provided supportive infrastructure for the development and publication of modernist writing—such as editors, publishers, and patrons—who oversaw and ran what Lawrence Rainey called the “institutions of modernism.”<sup>2</sup> With a new view-finder trained on textual production, there followed a decade of dispelling the myth of the modernist as solitary genius, engaging with the socio-material and collaborative realities of textual production and dissemination. In welcome ways, this line of work upended the lore around the “men of 1914”—Joyce, Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis—as primary movers of modernism, with their flashing eyes and floating hair, training attention instead on the mundane actualities needed to make things go, elevating as important agents of textual production many players in the field traditionally considered auxiliary, such as editors and publishers.</p> <p>In such scholarship, the spotlight frequently fell on women, often serving in such roles. Jayne E. Marek’s <em>Women Editing Modernism</em> featured editors of little magazines integral to modernism’s growth— such as Harriet Monroe of <em>Poetry</em>, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap of <em>The Little Review</em>, and Bryher of <em>Life and Letters Today</em>.<sup>3</sup> It was also a moment of heightened focus on writers’ correspondence with editors and publishers: the genre of the letter valuably placed in the forefront, relevant specifics traditionally in the background—details of fees and costs, day-to-day errands, uncertainties, and revisions: the quotidian underpinnings essential to the cultural work of modernism. Such welcome fine-grained information is similarly richly in evidence in this edition.</p> <p>Here, seen through a mosaic of such day-to-day transactions, is the woman responsible for the landmark publication of the book that would be banned for obscenity in both the United States and England. Beach’s 1922 publication of <em>Ulysses</em> in Paris was crucial to what became the <em>annus mirabilis</em> of modernism, which also saw the publication of Eliot’s <em>The Waste Land</em> and Virginia Woolf’s <em>Jacob’s Room</em>.<sup>4</sup> Beach knew the stakes of what was emerging: as she wrote playfully to her <strong>[End Page 633]</strong> mother in April 1921, with a glint of the big dreams that accompanied the usual apparent modesty of “SB”:</p> <blockquote> <p>[The bookshop is] more of a success every day and soon you may hear of us as a reglar [<em>sic</em>] Publishers and of the most important book of the age. . . . . . its [<em>sic</em>] a secret . . . and its going to make us famous. . . .!<sup>5...</sup></p> </blockquote> </p>","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Your Friend If Ever You Had One\\\": The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller (review)\",\"authors\":\"Miranda Dunham-Hickman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2023.a914629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>“Your Friend If Ever You Had One”: The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce</em> ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Miranda Dunham-Hickman (bio) </li> </ul> <em>“YOUR FRIEND IF EVER YOU HAD ONE”: THE LETTERS OF SYLVIA BEACH TO JAMES JOYCE</em>, edited by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2021), xxxiv + 329 pp. $146.00 cloth, ebook. <p><strong>T</strong>his astutely annotated volume at last provides a robust capture of the other side of the correspondence published in 1987 by editors Melissa Banta and Oscar A. Silverman, <em>James Joyce’s Letters to Sylvia Beach, 1921–1940</em>.<sup>1</sup> “<em>Your Friend If Ever You Had One</em>,” housing letters from Beach to both Joyce and, starting in the 1930s, Paul Léon—Beach’s successor in the informal role of Joyce’s secretary and administrator—is a windfall made possible in large part through a bequest from Hans E. Jahnke, stepson to Joyce’s son Giorgio. Roughly three-quarters of these letters derive from this donation, with additional letters supplied to round out the collection from the University at Buffalo, the National Library of Ireland, and Princeton University. <strong>[End Page 632]</strong> Of the edition’s 145 letters, 131 are published for the first time. The compilation offers a vivid portrait in letters of Beach, the owner of the famous Parisian bookshop Shakespeare and Company, tracing her evolving working relationship with Joyce through its periods of flourishing, tension, and eventual diminution in the 1930s, as Beach ceded her place as Joyce’s primary assistant to Léon.</p> <p>The moment of the earlier Banta and Silverman correspondence indicates a context important to discerning the significance of this new collection. Around 1990, just before the emergence of the New Modernist Studies, scholarly attention increasingly turned to the cultural workers who provided supportive infrastructure for the development and publication of modernist writing—such as editors, publishers, and patrons—who oversaw and ran what Lawrence Rainey called the “institutions of modernism.”<sup>2</sup> With a new view-finder trained on textual production, there followed a decade of dispelling the myth of the modernist as solitary genius, engaging with the socio-material and collaborative realities of textual production and dissemination. In welcome ways, this line of work upended the lore around the “men of 1914”—Joyce, Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis—as primary movers of modernism, with their flashing eyes and floating hair, training attention instead on the mundane actualities needed to make things go, elevating as important agents of textual production many players in the field traditionally considered auxiliary, such as editors and publishers.</p> <p>In such scholarship, the spotlight frequently fell on women, often serving in such roles. Jayne E. Marek’s <em>Women Editing Modernism</em> featured editors of little magazines integral to modernism’s growth— such as Harriet Monroe of <em>Poetry</em>, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap of <em>The Little Review</em>, and Bryher of <em>Life and Letters Today</em>.<sup>3</sup> It was also a moment of heightened focus on writers’ correspondence with editors and publishers: the genre of the letter valuably placed in the forefront, relevant specifics traditionally in the background—details of fees and costs, day-to-day errands, uncertainties, and revisions: the quotidian underpinnings essential to the cultural work of modernism. Such welcome fine-grained information is similarly richly in evidence in this edition.</p> <p>Here, seen through a mosaic of such day-to-day transactions, is the woman responsible for the landmark publication of the book that would be banned for obscenity in both the United States and England. Beach’s 1922 publication of <em>Ulysses</em> in Paris was crucial to what became the <em>annus mirabilis</em> of modernism, which also saw the publication of Eliot’s <em>The Waste Land</em> and Virginia Woolf’s <em>Jacob’s Room</em>.<sup>4</sup> Beach knew the stakes of what was emerging: as she wrote playfully to her <strong>[End Page 633]</strong> mother in April 1921, with a glint of the big dreams that accompanied the usual apparent modesty of “SB”:</p> <blockquote> <p>[The bookshop is] more of a success every day and soon you may hear of us as a reglar [<em>sic</em>] Publishers and of the most important book of the age. . . . . . its [<em>sic</em>] a secret . . . and its going to make us famous. . . .!<sup>5...</sup></p> </blockquote> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a914629\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a914629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: "你的朋友,如果你有的话":The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller Miranda Dunham-Hickman (bio) "YOUR FRIEND IF EVER YOU HAD ONE":由 Ruth Frehner 和 Ursula Zeller 编辑的《SYLVIA BEACH 致詹姆斯-乔伊斯的信》(波士顿:Brill Rodopi 出版社,2021 年),xxxiv + 329 页。146.00 美元,布面,电子书。这本敏锐的注释卷终于有力地捕捉到了梅丽莎-班塔(Melissa Banta)和奥斯卡-A-西尔弗曼(Oscar A. Silverman)编辑于 1987 年出版的《詹姆斯-乔伊斯写给西尔维娅-比奇的信(1921-1940 年)》中书信的另一面。1 "如果你有朋友的话 "收录了比奇写给乔伊斯的信件,以及从 20 世纪 30 年代开始,保罗-莱昂-比奇继任乔伊斯的秘书和管理人这一非正式角色的信件,这在很大程度上是通过乔伊斯之子乔治的继子汉斯-E-贾恩克的遗赠而获得的意外收获。这些书信中约有四分之三来自这次捐赠,另外还有布法罗大学、爱尔兰国家图书馆和普林斯顿大学提供的书信,使藏品更加丰富。[在该版本的 145 封信中,有 131 封是首次出版。这套书信集生动地描绘了巴黎著名书店 "莎士比亚与公司 "的店主比奇的形象,追溯了她与乔伊斯不断发展的工作关系,经历了兴旺时期、紧张时期,以及 20 世纪 30 年代比奇将自己作为乔伊斯主要助手的位置让给莱昂而最终淡化的时期。班塔和西尔弗曼早期通信的时刻表明了一个对辨别这本新文集的意义非常重要的背景。1990 年前后,就在 "新现代主义研究 "兴起之前,学术界的注意力越来越多地转向为现代主义写作的发展和出版提供支持性基础设施的文化工作者--如编辑、出版商和赞助人--他们监督和管理着劳伦斯-雷尼所称的 "现代主义机构 "2 。这一研究方向以令人欢迎的方式颠覆了 "1914 年的人"--乔伊斯、埃兹拉-庞德、T.S. 艾略特、温德姆-刘易斯--作为现代主义主要推动者的传说,他们闪烁的眼睛和飘逸的头发,将人们的注意力转移到了推动事物发展所需的世俗现实上,将文本生产领域中许多传统上被认为是辅助性的参与者,如编辑和出版商,提升为文本生产的重要推动者。在此类学术研究中,聚光灯经常落在女性身上,而她们往往担任着这样的角色。Jayne E. Marek 的《编辑现代主义的女性》一书介绍了与现代主义发展密不可分的小杂志的编辑,如《诗歌》的 Harriet Monroe、《小评论》的 Margaret Anderson 和 Jane Heap 以及《今日生活与文学》的 Bryher。这也是作家与编辑和出版商的通信得到高度关注的时期:书信的体裁被放在最重要的位置,而相关的细节则传统上被放在背景中--费用和成本、日常差事、不确定性和修改等细节:这些都是现代主义文化工作必不可少的日常基础。在这一版本中,这些受人欢迎的细节信息也同样丰富。从这些日常事务的马赛克中,我们可以看到这位女性负责出版的具有里程碑意义的书籍,该书后来在美国和英国都因淫秽而被列为禁书。1922 年,艾略特的《荒原》和弗吉尼亚-伍尔夫的《雅各布的房间》也在巴黎出版。4 比奇深知这本书的重要性:1921 年 4 月,她在写给母亲的信中嬉笑道[第 633 页末],"SB "的谦虚中闪烁着远大的梦想: [书店]一天比一天成功,不久你就会听说我们是一家伟大的[原文如此]出版商,也会听说我们出版了这个时代最重要的书。......这[原文如此]是个秘密.......它将使我们成名。. .!5...
"Your Friend If Ever You Had One": The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
“Your Friend If Ever You Had One”: The Letters Of Sylvia Beach To James Joyce ed. by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller
Miranda Dunham-Hickman (bio)
“YOUR FRIEND IF EVER YOU HAD ONE”: THE LETTERS OF SYLVIA BEACH TO JAMES JOYCE, edited by Ruth Frehner and Ursula Zeller (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2021), xxxiv + 329 pp. $146.00 cloth, ebook.
This astutely annotated volume at last provides a robust capture of the other side of the correspondence published in 1987 by editors Melissa Banta and Oscar A. Silverman, James Joyce’s Letters to Sylvia Beach, 1921–1940.1 “Your Friend If Ever You Had One,” housing letters from Beach to both Joyce and, starting in the 1930s, Paul Léon—Beach’s successor in the informal role of Joyce’s secretary and administrator—is a windfall made possible in large part through a bequest from Hans E. Jahnke, stepson to Joyce’s son Giorgio. Roughly three-quarters of these letters derive from this donation, with additional letters supplied to round out the collection from the University at Buffalo, the National Library of Ireland, and Princeton University. [End Page 632] Of the edition’s 145 letters, 131 are published for the first time. The compilation offers a vivid portrait in letters of Beach, the owner of the famous Parisian bookshop Shakespeare and Company, tracing her evolving working relationship with Joyce through its periods of flourishing, tension, and eventual diminution in the 1930s, as Beach ceded her place as Joyce’s primary assistant to Léon.
The moment of the earlier Banta and Silverman correspondence indicates a context important to discerning the significance of this new collection. Around 1990, just before the emergence of the New Modernist Studies, scholarly attention increasingly turned to the cultural workers who provided supportive infrastructure for the development and publication of modernist writing—such as editors, publishers, and patrons—who oversaw and ran what Lawrence Rainey called the “institutions of modernism.”2 With a new view-finder trained on textual production, there followed a decade of dispelling the myth of the modernist as solitary genius, engaging with the socio-material and collaborative realities of textual production and dissemination. In welcome ways, this line of work upended the lore around the “men of 1914”—Joyce, Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis—as primary movers of modernism, with their flashing eyes and floating hair, training attention instead on the mundane actualities needed to make things go, elevating as important agents of textual production many players in the field traditionally considered auxiliary, such as editors and publishers.
In such scholarship, the spotlight frequently fell on women, often serving in such roles. Jayne E. Marek’s Women Editing Modernism featured editors of little magazines integral to modernism’s growth— such as Harriet Monroe of Poetry, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap of The Little Review, and Bryher of Life and Letters Today.3 It was also a moment of heightened focus on writers’ correspondence with editors and publishers: the genre of the letter valuably placed in the forefront, relevant specifics traditionally in the background—details of fees and costs, day-to-day errands, uncertainties, and revisions: the quotidian underpinnings essential to the cultural work of modernism. Such welcome fine-grained information is similarly richly in evidence in this edition.
Here, seen through a mosaic of such day-to-day transactions, is the woman responsible for the landmark publication of the book that would be banned for obscenity in both the United States and England. Beach’s 1922 publication of Ulysses in Paris was crucial to what became the annus mirabilis of modernism, which also saw the publication of Eliot’s The Waste Land and Virginia Woolf’s Jacob’s Room.4 Beach knew the stakes of what was emerging: as she wrote playfully to her [End Page 633] mother in April 1921, with a glint of the big dreams that accompanied the usual apparent modesty of “SB”:
[The bookshop is] more of a success every day and soon you may hear of us as a reglar [sic] Publishers and of the most important book of the age. . . . . . its [sic] a secret . . . and its going to make us famous. . . .!5...
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.