利用纵向定性研究了解少数群体的经历

Q2 Psychology
Christine V. Wood , Ida Salusky , Remi F. Jones , Robin Remich , Anne E. Caliendo , Richard McGee
{"title":"利用纵向定性研究了解少数群体的经历","authors":"Christine V. Wood ,&nbsp;Ida Salusky ,&nbsp;Remi F. Jones ,&nbsp;Robin Remich ,&nbsp;Anne E. Caliendo ,&nbsp;Richard McGee","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2023.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper demonstrates how Longitudinal Qualitative Research (LQR) is an innovative method to understand the lived experiences of members of minoritized groups when temporality is a structuring element of their experiences. Most qualitative research in psychology is cross-sectional, which limits our understanding of individuals whose experiences are context-dependent and linked to the temporal norms of specific social environments. LQR is unique for allowing researchers to compare change and stability over time and reveal how social challenges and barriers impact perspective shifts and long-term decision-making. To demonstrate the usefulness of LQR as an inclusive methodology, we discuss an ongoing study of career decision-making among a diverse cohort of biomedical scientists. We have used annual interviews to follow biomedical science trainees from the beginning of their PhD into the initial stages of their careers. We present case studies of minoritized scientists to illustrate the methods for long-term engagement used to elicit sensitive and critical information during their training. We show how LQR is a viable methodology for a variety of research questions and can be accomplished using large or small sample sizes and limited resources. Our primary goal is to show how LQR is useful to understand the experiences of minoritized individuals in contexts that have historically excluded them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260123000218/pdfft?md5=0344f7b5a9c311b65495788178bc32fd&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260123000218-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using longitudinal qualitative research to understand the experiences of minoritized people\",\"authors\":\"Christine V. Wood ,&nbsp;Ida Salusky ,&nbsp;Remi F. Jones ,&nbsp;Robin Remich ,&nbsp;Anne E. Caliendo ,&nbsp;Richard McGee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2023.100130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper demonstrates how Longitudinal Qualitative Research (LQR) is an innovative method to understand the lived experiences of members of minoritized groups when temporality is a structuring element of their experiences. Most qualitative research in psychology is cross-sectional, which limits our understanding of individuals whose experiences are context-dependent and linked to the temporal norms of specific social environments. LQR is unique for allowing researchers to compare change and stability over time and reveal how social challenges and barriers impact perspective shifts and long-term decision-making. To demonstrate the usefulness of LQR as an inclusive methodology, we discuss an ongoing study of career decision-making among a diverse cohort of biomedical scientists. We have used annual interviews to follow biomedical science trainees from the beginning of their PhD into the initial stages of their careers. We present case studies of minoritized scientists to illustrate the methods for long-term engagement used to elicit sensitive and critical information during their training. We show how LQR is a viable methodology for a variety of research questions and can be accomplished using large or small sample sizes and limited resources. Our primary goal is to show how LQR is useful to understand the experiences of minoritized individuals in contexts that have historically excluded them.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260123000218/pdfft?md5=0344f7b5a9c311b65495788178bc32fd&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260123000218-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260123000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260123000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文展示了纵向定性研究(LQR)是一种创新的方法来理解少数群体成员的生活经验,当暂时性是他们的经验的结构元素。大多数心理学定性研究都是横断面的,这限制了我们对个体的理解,这些个体的经历依赖于上下文,与特定社会环境的时间规范有关。LQR的独特之处在于,它允许研究人员比较一段时间内的变化和稳定,并揭示社会挑战和障碍如何影响观点转变和长期决策。为了证明LQR作为一种包容性方法的有效性,我们讨论了一项正在进行的生物医学科学家职业决策的研究。我们使用年度访谈来跟踪生物医学科学学员从博士学位开始到职业生涯的初始阶段。我们提出了少数族裔科学家的案例研究,以说明长期参与的方法,用于在他们的培训中引出敏感和关键的信息。我们展示了LQR如何成为各种研究问题的可行方法,并且可以使用或大或小的样本量和有限的资源来完成。我们的主要目标是展示LQR对于理解少数群体在历史上被排斥的环境中的经历是如何有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using longitudinal qualitative research to understand the experiences of minoritized people

This paper demonstrates how Longitudinal Qualitative Research (LQR) is an innovative method to understand the lived experiences of members of minoritized groups when temporality is a structuring element of their experiences. Most qualitative research in psychology is cross-sectional, which limits our understanding of individuals whose experiences are context-dependent and linked to the temporal norms of specific social environments. LQR is unique for allowing researchers to compare change and stability over time and reveal how social challenges and barriers impact perspective shifts and long-term decision-making. To demonstrate the usefulness of LQR as an inclusive methodology, we discuss an ongoing study of career decision-making among a diverse cohort of biomedical scientists. We have used annual interviews to follow biomedical science trainees from the beginning of their PhD into the initial stages of their careers. We present case studies of minoritized scientists to illustrate the methods for long-term engagement used to elicit sensitive and critical information during their training. We show how LQR is a viable methodology for a variety of research questions and can be accomplished using large or small sample sizes and limited resources. Our primary goal is to show how LQR is useful to understand the experiences of minoritized individuals in contexts that have historically excluded them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信