2003 年楚雅地震后阿尔泰地震活动的演变

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
A. F. Emanov, A. A. Emanov, A. V. Fateev, E. V. Shevkunova, E. A. Gladyshev
{"title":"2003 年楚雅地震后阿尔泰地震活动的演变","authors":"A. F. Emanov,&nbsp;A. A. Emanov,&nbsp;A. V. Fateev,&nbsp;E. V. Shevkunova,&nbsp;E. A. Gladyshev","doi":"10.1134/S0742046323700355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Chuya earthquake of 2003 exerted an appreciable influence on the seismicity of the entire Altai. This paper presents data on variations in the Altai seismicity from 2003 to 2021. It is shown that earthquakes of the first half-year after the major earthquake of 2003 had their rupture zones in the epicentral zone, while the other Altai structures were aseismic. After 2009 we saw changes both in the near zone that encompasses geological structures that were adjacent to the epicenter (with distances of 60‒80 km from the mainshock epicenter), such as the Aigulak, Kurai, South Chuisky and North Chuisky mountain ranges, and in the far zone at distances of 250‒450 km from the epicenter and in different directions from it. The Aigulak earthquake of 2019 gave rise to an aftershock process that displaced the center of Altai seismicity to the eponymous mountain range. There are no data on large earthquakes during the historical period for many Altai structures which have been activated following the Chuya earthquake, either from seismological or from paleo-geological evidence. One could explain the evolution of seismicity around the rupture zone of the Chuya earthquake in space, and with time delays of some years, invoking the influence of a large earthquake on a medium involving plasticity. We know of nonlinear models that hold promise for future research concerning the influence of large earthquakes on the evolution of seismicity in geological media.</p>","PeriodicalId":56112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","volume":"17 6","pages":"460 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Altai Seismicity Following the Chuya Earthquake of 2003\",\"authors\":\"A. F. Emanov,&nbsp;A. A. Emanov,&nbsp;A. V. Fateev,&nbsp;E. V. Shevkunova,&nbsp;E. A. Gladyshev\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0742046323700355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Chuya earthquake of 2003 exerted an appreciable influence on the seismicity of the entire Altai. This paper presents data on variations in the Altai seismicity from 2003 to 2021. It is shown that earthquakes of the first half-year after the major earthquake of 2003 had their rupture zones in the epicentral zone, while the other Altai structures were aseismic. After 2009 we saw changes both in the near zone that encompasses geological structures that were adjacent to the epicenter (with distances of 60‒80 km from the mainshock epicenter), such as the Aigulak, Kurai, South Chuisky and North Chuisky mountain ranges, and in the far zone at distances of 250‒450 km from the epicenter and in different directions from it. The Aigulak earthquake of 2019 gave rise to an aftershock process that displaced the center of Altai seismicity to the eponymous mountain range. There are no data on large earthquakes during the historical period for many Altai structures which have been activated following the Chuya earthquake, either from seismological or from paleo-geological evidence. One could explain the evolution of seismicity around the rupture zone of the Chuya earthquake in space, and with time delays of some years, invoking the influence of a large earthquake on a medium involving plasticity. We know of nonlinear models that hold promise for future research concerning the influence of large earthquakes on the evolution of seismicity in geological media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"460 - 473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046323700355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046323700355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要2003年楚亚地震对整个阿尔泰地区的地震活动性产生了可观的影响。本文介绍了2003 - 2021年阿尔泰地震活动的变化情况。结果表明,2003年大地震后的前半年发生的地震,其破裂带均位于震中带,而阿尔泰其他构造均为地震。2009年之后,我们看到了震中附近地质构造(距离主震震中60-80公里)的近区(如Aigulak、Kurai、South Chuisky和North Chuisky山脉)以及距离震中250-450公里且方向不同的远区(距离震中250-450公里)的变化。2019年的艾古拉克地震引发了余震,将阿尔泰地震活动的中心转移到了同名山脉。从地震学和古地质的证据来看,在楚亚地震后被激活的许多阿尔泰构造在历史时期都没有大地震的资料。人们可以在空间上解释楚亚地震断裂带周围地震活动的演变,并在时间上延迟若干年,援引大地震对涉及塑性的介质的影响。我们知道非线性模型对未来研究大地震对地质介质中地震活动性演化的影响有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Evolution of Altai Seismicity Following the Chuya Earthquake of 2003

The Evolution of Altai Seismicity Following the Chuya Earthquake of 2003

The Evolution of Altai Seismicity Following the Chuya Earthquake of 2003

The Chuya earthquake of 2003 exerted an appreciable influence on the seismicity of the entire Altai. This paper presents data on variations in the Altai seismicity from 2003 to 2021. It is shown that earthquakes of the first half-year after the major earthquake of 2003 had their rupture zones in the epicentral zone, while the other Altai structures were aseismic. After 2009 we saw changes both in the near zone that encompasses geological structures that were adjacent to the epicenter (with distances of 60‒80 km from the mainshock epicenter), such as the Aigulak, Kurai, South Chuisky and North Chuisky mountain ranges, and in the far zone at distances of 250‒450 km from the epicenter and in different directions from it. The Aigulak earthquake of 2019 gave rise to an aftershock process that displaced the center of Altai seismicity to the eponymous mountain range. There are no data on large earthquakes during the historical period for many Altai structures which have been activated following the Chuya earthquake, either from seismological or from paleo-geological evidence. One could explain the evolution of seismicity around the rupture zone of the Chuya earthquake in space, and with time delays of some years, invoking the influence of a large earthquake on a medium involving plasticity. We know of nonlinear models that hold promise for future research concerning the influence of large earthquakes on the evolution of seismicity in geological media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Volcanology and Seismology publishes theoretical and experimental studies, communications, and reports on volcanic, seismic, geodynamic, and magmatic processes occurring in the areas of island arcs and other active regions of the Earth. In particular, the journal looks at present-day land and submarine volcanic activity; Neogene–Quaternary volcanism; mechanisms of plutonic activity; the geochemistry of volcanic and postvolcanic processes; geothermal systems in volcanic regions; and seismological monitoring. In addition, the journal surveys earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and techniques for predicting them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信