使用因果循环图开发评价性研究命题:应用于基于自然的解决方案的机遇与挑战

IF 1.7 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Miriam Alvarado, Jo Garrett, James Fullam, Rebecca Lovell, Cornelia Guell, Tim Taylor, Ruth Garside, Marianne Zandersen, Benedict W. Wheeler
{"title":"使用因果循环图开发评价性研究命题:应用于基于自然的解决方案的机遇与挑战","authors":"Miriam Alvarado, Jo Garrett, James Fullam, Rebecca Lovell, Cornelia Guell, Tim Taylor, Ruth Garside, Marianne Zandersen, Benedict W. Wheeler","doi":"10.1002/sdr.1756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are often used to provide an overview of important systemic elements related to an issue, rather than to inform empirical evaluations (studies which assess changes following an intervention using observed data). We suggest that empirical evaluations may benefit from the development of systems-informed research propositions (specific testable causal assumptions with an emphasis on feedback loops) used to guide subsequent data collection, hypothesis testing and interpretation. We describe a qualitative systems-thinking informed approach building on preexisting CLDs, published evidence, and expert/stakeholder consultation and reflect on our experience applying this to the early stages of two nature-based solution (NBS) evaluations. We reflect on our experience and suggest that CLDs can be usefully employed to develop systems-informed research propositions to inform subsequent empirical evaluation. This may lead to novel policy-relevant research propositions which differ substantially from effectiveness-oriented (“did it work?”) research questions. © 2023 The Authors. <i>System Dynamics Review</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.","PeriodicalId":51500,"journal":{"name":"System Dynamics Review","volume":"178 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using causal loop diagrams to develop evaluative research propositions: opportunities and challenges in applications to nature-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Alvarado, Jo Garrett, James Fullam, Rebecca Lovell, Cornelia Guell, Tim Taylor, Ruth Garside, Marianne Zandersen, Benedict W. Wheeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sdr.1756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are often used to provide an overview of important systemic elements related to an issue, rather than to inform empirical evaluations (studies which assess changes following an intervention using observed data). We suggest that empirical evaluations may benefit from the development of systems-informed research propositions (specific testable causal assumptions with an emphasis on feedback loops) used to guide subsequent data collection, hypothesis testing and interpretation. We describe a qualitative systems-thinking informed approach building on preexisting CLDs, published evidence, and expert/stakeholder consultation and reflect on our experience applying this to the early stages of two nature-based solution (NBS) evaluations. We reflect on our experience and suggest that CLDs can be usefully employed to develop systems-informed research propositions to inform subsequent empirical evaluation. This may lead to novel policy-relevant research propositions which differ substantially from effectiveness-oriented (“did it work?”) research questions. © 2023 The Authors. <i>System Dynamics Review</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System Dynamics Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因果循环图(CLDs)通常用于提供与问题相关的重要系统要素的概述,而不是为经验评估提供信息(使用观察到的数据评估干预后变化的研究)。我们建议,实证评估可能受益于系统信息研究命题(强调反馈循环的具体可测试因果假设)的发展,用于指导后续的数据收集、假设检验和解释。我们描述了一种定性的系统思考的知情方法,该方法建立在先前存在的cld,已发表的证据和专家/利益相关者咨询的基础上,并反思了我们将其应用于两个基于自然的解决方案(NBS)评估的早期阶段的经验。我们反思了我们的经验,并建议cld可以有效地用于开发系统知情的研究命题,以告知后续的实证评估。这可能导致新的与政策相关的研究命题,这些命题与以有效性为导向(“它有效吗?”)的研究问题有很大不同。©2023作者。John Wiley &出版的《系统动力学评论》;儿子有限公司代表系统动力学学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using causal loop diagrams to develop evaluative research propositions: opportunities and challenges in applications to nature-based solutions
Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are often used to provide an overview of important systemic elements related to an issue, rather than to inform empirical evaluations (studies which assess changes following an intervention using observed data). We suggest that empirical evaluations may benefit from the development of systems-informed research propositions (specific testable causal assumptions with an emphasis on feedback loops) used to guide subsequent data collection, hypothesis testing and interpretation. We describe a qualitative systems-thinking informed approach building on preexisting CLDs, published evidence, and expert/stakeholder consultation and reflect on our experience applying this to the early stages of two nature-based solution (NBS) evaluations. We reflect on our experience and suggest that CLDs can be usefully employed to develop systems-informed research propositions to inform subsequent empirical evaluation. This may lead to novel policy-relevant research propositions which differ substantially from effectiveness-oriented (“did it work?”) research questions. © 2023 The Authors. System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The System Dynamics Review exists to communicate to a wide audience advances in the application of the perspectives and methods of system dynamics to societal, technical, managerial, and environmental problems. The Review publishes: advances in mathematical modelling and computer simulation of dynamic feedback systems; advances in methods of policy analysis based on information feedback and circular causality; generic structures (dynamic feedback systems that support particular widely applicable behavioural insights); system dynamics contributions to theory building in the social and natural sciences; policy studies and debate emphasizing the role of feedback and circular causality in problem behaviour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信