{"title":"具有异质噪声方差和相关解释变量的气候指纹回归中的总最小二乘法偏差","authors":"Ross McKitrick","doi":"10.1002/env.2835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regression-based “fingerprinting” methods in climate science employ total least squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression to remedy attenuation bias arising from measurement error due to reliance on climate model-generated explanatory variables. Proving the consistency of multivariate TLS requires assuming noise variances are equal across all variables in the model. This assumption has been challenged empirically in the climate context but little is known about TLS biases when the assumption is violated. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the noise variances are not equal. The analysis allows the explanatory variables to be negatively correlated which is typical in climate applications. Ordinary least squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias which vanishes as the noise variances on the explanatory variables disappear. In some cases, TLS corrects attenuation bias but more typically imparts large and generally positive biases. OLS performs well when the true value of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\beta =0 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> whereas TLS performs quite poorly. This implies that TLS is not well suited for tests of the null. When <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\beta =1 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> TLS tends to exhibit opposite biases to OLS. Diagnostic information specific to each data sample should be consulted before using TLS to avoid spurious inferences and replacing OLS attenuation bias with other, potentially larger biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total least squares bias in climate fingerprinting regressions with heterogeneous noise variances and correlated explanatory variables\",\"authors\":\"Ross McKitrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/env.2835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Regression-based “fingerprinting” methods in climate science employ total least squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression to remedy attenuation bias arising from measurement error due to reliance on climate model-generated explanatory variables. Proving the consistency of multivariate TLS requires assuming noise variances are equal across all variables in the model. This assumption has been challenged empirically in the climate context but little is known about TLS biases when the assumption is violated. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the noise variances are not equal. The analysis allows the explanatory variables to be negatively correlated which is typical in climate applications. Ordinary least squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias which vanishes as the noise variances on the explanatory variables disappear. In some cases, TLS corrects attenuation bias but more typically imparts large and generally positive biases. OLS performs well when the true value of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =0 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> whereas TLS performs quite poorly. This implies that TLS is not well suited for tests of the null. When <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =1 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> TLS tends to exhibit opposite biases to OLS. Diagnostic information specific to each data sample should be consulted before using TLS to avoid spurious inferences and replacing OLS attenuation bias with other, potentially larger biases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmetrics\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2835\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Total least squares bias in climate fingerprinting regressions with heterogeneous noise variances and correlated explanatory variables
Regression-based “fingerprinting” methods in climate science employ total least squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression to remedy attenuation bias arising from measurement error due to reliance on climate model-generated explanatory variables. Proving the consistency of multivariate TLS requires assuming noise variances are equal across all variables in the model. This assumption has been challenged empirically in the climate context but little is known about TLS biases when the assumption is violated. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the noise variances are not equal. The analysis allows the explanatory variables to be negatively correlated which is typical in climate applications. Ordinary least squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias which vanishes as the noise variances on the explanatory variables disappear. In some cases, TLS corrects attenuation bias but more typically imparts large and generally positive biases. OLS performs well when the true value of whereas TLS performs quite poorly. This implies that TLS is not well suited for tests of the null. When TLS tends to exhibit opposite biases to OLS. Diagnostic information specific to each data sample should be consulted before using TLS to avoid spurious inferences and replacing OLS attenuation bias with other, potentially larger biases.
期刊介绍:
Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences.
The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.