利用实施科学在髋部骨折护理中推广使用髂筋膜块

Marjorie Hammond, Vivian Law, Keelia Quinn de Launay, Jeanette Cooper, Elikem Togo, Kyle Silveira, David MacKinnon, Nick Lo, Sarah E. Ward, Stephen K. W. Chan, Sharon E. Straus, Christine Fahim, Camilla L. Wong
{"title":"利用实施科学在髋部骨折护理中推广使用髂筋膜块","authors":"Marjorie Hammond, Vivian Law, Keelia Quinn de Launay, Jeanette Cooper, Elikem Togo, Kyle Silveira, David MacKinnon, Nick Lo, Sarah E. Ward, Stephen K. W. Chan, Sharon E. Straus, Christine Fahim, Camilla L. Wong","doi":"10.1007/s12630-023-02665-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>There is variable and suboptimal use of fascia iliaca compartment nerve blocks (FICBs) in hip fracture care. Our objective was to use an evidence-based and theory-informed implementation science approach to analyze barriers and facilitators to timely administration of FICB and select evidence-based interventions to enhance uptake.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study at a single centre using semistructured interviews and site observations. We interviewed 35 stakeholders including health care providers, managers, patients, and caregivers. We mapped barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We compared the rate and timeliness of FICB administration before and after evidence-based implementation strategies were applied.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The study identified 18 barriers and 11 facilitators within seven themes of influences of FICB use: interpersonal relationships between health care professionals; clinician knowledge and skills related to FICB; roles, responsibilities, and processes for delivering FICB; perceptions on using FICB for pain; patient and caregiver perceptions on using FICB for pain; communication of hip fracture care between departments; and resources for delivering FICBs. We mapped the behaviour change domains to eight implementation strategies: restructure the environment, create and distribute educational materials, prepare patients to be active participants, perform audits and give feedback, use local opinion leaders, use champions, train staff on FICB procedures, and mandate change. We observed an increase in the rates of FICBs administered (48% <i>vs</i> 65%) and a decrease in the median time to administration (1.63 <i>vs</i> 0.81 days).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study explains why FICBs are underused and shows that the TDF and CFIR provide a framework to identify barriers and facilitators to FICB implementation. The mapped implementation strategies can guide institutions to improve use of FICB in hip fracture care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9472,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using implementation science to promote the use of the fascia iliaca blocks in hip fracture care\",\"authors\":\"Marjorie Hammond, Vivian Law, Keelia Quinn de Launay, Jeanette Cooper, Elikem Togo, Kyle Silveira, David MacKinnon, Nick Lo, Sarah E. Ward, Stephen K. W. Chan, Sharon E. Straus, Christine Fahim, Camilla L. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-023-02665-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>There is variable and suboptimal use of fascia iliaca compartment nerve blocks (FICBs) in hip fracture care. Our objective was to use an evidence-based and theory-informed implementation science approach to analyze barriers and facilitators to timely administration of FICB and select evidence-based interventions to enhance uptake.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study at a single centre using semistructured interviews and site observations. We interviewed 35 stakeholders including health care providers, managers, patients, and caregivers. We mapped barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We compared the rate and timeliness of FICB administration before and after evidence-based implementation strategies were applied.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The study identified 18 barriers and 11 facilitators within seven themes of influences of FICB use: interpersonal relationships between health care professionals; clinician knowledge and skills related to FICB; roles, responsibilities, and processes for delivering FICB; perceptions on using FICB for pain; patient and caregiver perceptions on using FICB for pain; communication of hip fracture care between departments; and resources for delivering FICBs. We mapped the behaviour change domains to eight implementation strategies: restructure the environment, create and distribute educational materials, prepare patients to be active participants, perform audits and give feedback, use local opinion leaders, use champions, train staff on FICB procedures, and mandate change. We observed an increase in the rates of FICBs administered (48% <i>vs</i> 65%) and a decrease in the median time to administration (1.63 <i>vs</i> 0.81 days).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study explains why FICBs are underused and shows that the TDF and CFIR provide a framework to identify barriers and facilitators to FICB implementation. The mapped implementation strategies can guide institutions to improve use of FICB in hip fracture care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02665-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02665-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的髂筋膜间室神经阻滞(FICBs)在髋部骨折治疗中的应用存在变数和次优性。我们的目标是使用基于证据和理论的实施科学方法来分析FICB及时管理的障碍和促进因素,并选择基于证据的干预措施来提高吸收。方法采用半结构化访谈和现场观察,在单一中心进行定性研究。我们采访了35个利益相关者,包括卫生保健提供者、管理人员、患者和护理人员。我们将障碍和促进因素映射到理论领域框架(TDF)和实施研究综合框架(CFIR)。我们比较了采用循证实施策略前后FICB管理的比率和及时性。结果在影响FICB使用的七个主题中确定了18个障碍和11个促进因素:卫生保健专业人员之间的人际关系;与FICB相关的临床知识和技能;提供FICB的角色、职责和流程;对使用FICB治疗疼痛的看法;患者和护理人员对使用FICB治疗疼痛的看法;髋部骨折护理的科室沟通;以及提供国际商业银行的资源。我们将行为改变领域映射到八个实施策略:重组环境,创建和分发教育材料,使患者成为积极的参与者,执行审计并提供反馈,使用当地意见领袖,使用倡导者,培训员工了解FICB程序,以及改变授权。我们观察到ficb的使用率增加(48% vs 65%),中位给药时间减少(1.63 vs 0.81天)。我们的研究解释了FICB未被充分利用的原因,并表明TDF和CFIR提供了一个框架来识别FICB实施的障碍和促进因素。绘制的实施策略可以指导机构提高FICB在髋部骨折护理中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using implementation science to promote the use of the fascia iliaca blocks in hip fracture care

Purpose

There is variable and suboptimal use of fascia iliaca compartment nerve blocks (FICBs) in hip fracture care. Our objective was to use an evidence-based and theory-informed implementation science approach to analyze barriers and facilitators to timely administration of FICB and select evidence-based interventions to enhance uptake.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study at a single centre using semistructured interviews and site observations. We interviewed 35 stakeholders including health care providers, managers, patients, and caregivers. We mapped barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We compared the rate and timeliness of FICB administration before and after evidence-based implementation strategies were applied.

Results

The study identified 18 barriers and 11 facilitators within seven themes of influences of FICB use: interpersonal relationships between health care professionals; clinician knowledge and skills related to FICB; roles, responsibilities, and processes for delivering FICB; perceptions on using FICB for pain; patient and caregiver perceptions on using FICB for pain; communication of hip fracture care between departments; and resources for delivering FICBs. We mapped the behaviour change domains to eight implementation strategies: restructure the environment, create and distribute educational materials, prepare patients to be active participants, perform audits and give feedback, use local opinion leaders, use champions, train staff on FICB procedures, and mandate change. We observed an increase in the rates of FICBs administered (48% vs 65%) and a decrease in the median time to administration (1.63 vs 0.81 days).

Conclusion

Our study explains why FICBs are underused and shows that the TDF and CFIR provide a framework to identify barriers and facilitators to FICB implementation. The mapped implementation strategies can guide institutions to improve use of FICB in hip fracture care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信