竞争型专制主义、信息型专制主义和独裁统治的发展：白俄罗斯案例研究

IF 1.6 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Public Choice Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s11127-023-01132-2

Anthony J. Evans

{"title":"竞争型专制主义、信息型专制主义和独裁统治的发展：白俄罗斯案例研究","authors":"Anthony J. Evans","doi":"10.1007/s11127-023-01132-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the dynamics of modern authoritarian regimes, using Belarus under Alexander Lukashenko as a case study. By examining Belarus’s transition from a “competitive authoritarian” regime to a “hegemonic authoritarian” one from 1994 to 1996 and its further shift from a spin dictatorship to a fear dictatorship in 2020, the study offers insights into the multifaceted nature of dictatorships. The main findings are that using elections as a means to classify regimes does not fully explain their effect on authoritarian vulnerability and that different classifications of dictatorship, such as spin versus fear, are not necessarily mutually exclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":48322,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive authoritarianism, informational authoritarianism, and the development of dictatorship: a case study of Belarus\",\"authors\":\"Anthony J. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11127-023-01132-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores the dynamics of modern authoritarian regimes, using Belarus under Alexander Lukashenko as a case study. By examining Belarus’s transition from a “competitive authoritarian” regime to a “hegemonic authoritarian” one from 1994 to 1996 and its further shift from a spin dictatorship to a fear dictatorship in 2020, the study offers insights into the multifaceted nature of dictatorships. The main findings are that using elections as a means to classify regimes does not fully explain their effect on authoritarian vulnerability and that different classifications of dictatorship, such as spin versus fear, are not necessarily mutually exclusive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Choice\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01132-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01132-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以亚历山大·卢卡申科(Alexander Lukashenko)统治下的白俄罗斯为例，探讨了现代专制政权的动态。通过研究白俄罗斯从1994年到1996年从“竞争性威权”政权到“霸权威权”政权的转变，以及到2020年从旋转独裁到恐惧独裁的进一步转变，该研究提供了对独裁统治的多面性的见解。研究的主要发现是，将选举作为对政权进行分类的手段，并不能完全解释它们对威权主义脆弱性的影响，而且对独裁政权的不同分类，比如舆论与恐惧，并不一定是相互排斥的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Competitive authoritarianism, informational authoritarianism, and the development of dictatorship: a case study of Belarus

查看原文本刊更多论文

Competitive authoritarianism, informational authoritarianism, and the development of dictatorship: a case study of Belarus

This article explores the dynamics of modern authoritarian regimes, using Belarus under Alexander Lukashenko as a case study. By examining Belarus’s transition from a “competitive authoritarian” regime to a “hegemonic authoritarian” one from 1994 to 1996 and its further shift from a spin dictatorship to a fear dictatorship in 2020, the study offers insights into the multifaceted nature of dictatorships. The main findings are that using elections as a means to classify regimes does not fully explain their effect on authoritarian vulnerability and that different classifications of dictatorship, such as spin versus fear, are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Choice Multiple-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

18.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Public Choice deals with the intersection between economics and political science. The journal was founded at a time when economists and political scientists became interested in the application of essentially economic methods to problems normally dealt with by political scientists. It has always retained strong traces of economic methodology, but new and fruitful techniques have been developed which are not recognizable by economists. Public Choice therefore remains central in its chosen role of introducing the two groups to each other, and allowing them to explain themselves through the medium of its pages. Officially cited as: Public Choice