Nicole M. Cameron, Ricardo A. Scrosati, Nelson Valdivia
{"title":"基础物种(贻贝与海藻)的结构和功能特性可预测相关群落的功能方面","authors":"Nicole M. Cameron, Ricardo A. Scrosati, Nelson Valdivia","doi":"10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foundation species are spatially dominant species that increase habitat complexity and provide substrate and shelter for many smaller species. Through a mensurative field experiment, we tested the hypothesis that functional aspects of the associated communities are related to structural and functional properties of the foundation species. Specifically, we contrasted invertebrate communities living in mussel (<i>Mytilus</i>) and seaweed (<i>Chondrus</i>) stands from the same rocky intertidal environments in Atlantic Canada. Both stands reach similar heights above the substrate, but they differ structurally (rigid mussel shells vs. flexible seaweed fronds) and functionally (mussels generate biowaste while seaweeds offer food for herbivores). Our data supported the hypothesis in various ways. Detritivory (mostly by oligochaetes) was more prevalent in mussel stands, while herbivory was more prevalent in seaweed stands. Predators were mostly mites and, consequently, they were more prevalent in mussel stands, as mites eat oligochaetes. Functional traits related to body and mobility types were also related to properties of the foundation species. Overall, we conclude that structural and functional properties of foundation species can predict functional aspects of the associated communities. This concept may help to develop effective restoration strategies after the loss of foundation species due to anthropogenic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50994,"journal":{"name":"Community Ecology","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural and functional properties of foundation species (mussels vs. seaweeds) predict functional aspects of the associated communities\",\"authors\":\"Nicole M. Cameron, Ricardo A. Scrosati, Nelson Valdivia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Foundation species are spatially dominant species that increase habitat complexity and provide substrate and shelter for many smaller species. Through a mensurative field experiment, we tested the hypothesis that functional aspects of the associated communities are related to structural and functional properties of the foundation species. Specifically, we contrasted invertebrate communities living in mussel (<i>Mytilus</i>) and seaweed (<i>Chondrus</i>) stands from the same rocky intertidal environments in Atlantic Canada. Both stands reach similar heights above the substrate, but they differ structurally (rigid mussel shells vs. flexible seaweed fronds) and functionally (mussels generate biowaste while seaweeds offer food for herbivores). Our data supported the hypothesis in various ways. Detritivory (mostly by oligochaetes) was more prevalent in mussel stands, while herbivory was more prevalent in seaweed stands. Predators were mostly mites and, consequently, they were more prevalent in mussel stands, as mites eat oligochaetes. Functional traits related to body and mobility types were also related to properties of the foundation species. Overall, we conclude that structural and functional properties of foundation species can predict functional aspects of the associated communities. This concept may help to develop effective restoration strategies after the loss of foundation species due to anthropogenic factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Ecology\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural and functional properties of foundation species (mussels vs. seaweeds) predict functional aspects of the associated communities
Foundation species are spatially dominant species that increase habitat complexity and provide substrate and shelter for many smaller species. Through a mensurative field experiment, we tested the hypothesis that functional aspects of the associated communities are related to structural and functional properties of the foundation species. Specifically, we contrasted invertebrate communities living in mussel (Mytilus) and seaweed (Chondrus) stands from the same rocky intertidal environments in Atlantic Canada. Both stands reach similar heights above the substrate, but they differ structurally (rigid mussel shells vs. flexible seaweed fronds) and functionally (mussels generate biowaste while seaweeds offer food for herbivores). Our data supported the hypothesis in various ways. Detritivory (mostly by oligochaetes) was more prevalent in mussel stands, while herbivory was more prevalent in seaweed stands. Predators were mostly mites and, consequently, they were more prevalent in mussel stands, as mites eat oligochaetes. Functional traits related to body and mobility types were also related to properties of the foundation species. Overall, we conclude that structural and functional properties of foundation species can predict functional aspects of the associated communities. This concept may help to develop effective restoration strategies after the loss of foundation species due to anthropogenic factors.
期刊介绍:
Community Ecology, established by the merger of two ecological periodicals, Coenoses and Abstracta Botanica was launched in an effort to create a common global forum for community ecologists dealing with plant, animal and/or microbial communities from terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems. Main subject areas: (i) community-based ecological theory; (ii) modelling of ecological communities; (iii) community-based ecophysiology; (iv) temporal dynamics, including succession; (v) trophic interactions, including food webs and competition; (vi) spatial pattern analysis, including scaling issues; (vii) community patterns of species richness and diversity; (viii) sampling ecological communities; (ix) data analysis methods.