{"title":"在线零售商在实施店铺品牌时的战略合同选择","authors":"Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, He Xu, Stuart X. Zhu","doi":"10.1002/nav.22168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the impact of demand uncertainty on online retailers' store branding partnerships with manufacturers. The study examines whether such partnerships, involving service effort to boost demand, are effective under uncertain conditions. The supply chain comprises an intermediary and a manufacturer, with the manufacturer facing a service cost disadvantage. The benchmark case is the manufacturer's sale through the agency (AG) contract with the intermediary. Using a two-period game-theoretic model, the study analyzes equilibrium prices, service efforts, and profits for the AG contract and two store branding contracts: original design manufacturer (ODM) and acquisition (AC). Findings show that the intermediary adopts store branding when its service cost advantage is significant. The intermediary exhibits a preference for the ODM contract when the commission fee falls within a moderate range. Conversely, when it deviates from this middle ground, the AC contract becomes more favorable. Within the AC contract framework, with low commission fees, specifically when the service cost advantage is not particularly pronounced and demand variability is high, the intermediary opts to trigger the acquisition option exclusively when the actual demand turns out to be substantial. With high commission fees, the intermediary avoids the acquisition option. These outcomes arise from balancing the double marginalization effect caused by factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale price. Implementing store branding through ODM or AC contracts enhances supply chain profit when it is optimal for the intermediary. We provide insights into online retailers' decision-making regarding store branding partnerships with manufacturers under demand uncertainty. It highlights the importance of considering factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale prices to determine the optimal store branding strategy. The research contributes to understanding supply chain dynamics and suggests ways to enhance supply chain profit in online retail.","PeriodicalId":49772,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic contract selection of an online retailer when implementing store branding\",\"authors\":\"Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, He Xu, Stuart X. Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nav.22168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates the impact of demand uncertainty on online retailers' store branding partnerships with manufacturers. The study examines whether such partnerships, involving service effort to boost demand, are effective under uncertain conditions. The supply chain comprises an intermediary and a manufacturer, with the manufacturer facing a service cost disadvantage. The benchmark case is the manufacturer's sale through the agency (AG) contract with the intermediary. Using a two-period game-theoretic model, the study analyzes equilibrium prices, service efforts, and profits for the AG contract and two store branding contracts: original design manufacturer (ODM) and acquisition (AC). Findings show that the intermediary adopts store branding when its service cost advantage is significant. The intermediary exhibits a preference for the ODM contract when the commission fee falls within a moderate range. Conversely, when it deviates from this middle ground, the AC contract becomes more favorable. Within the AC contract framework, with low commission fees, specifically when the service cost advantage is not particularly pronounced and demand variability is high, the intermediary opts to trigger the acquisition option exclusively when the actual demand turns out to be substantial. With high commission fees, the intermediary avoids the acquisition option. These outcomes arise from balancing the double marginalization effect caused by factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale price. Implementing store branding through ODM or AC contracts enhances supply chain profit when it is optimal for the intermediary. We provide insights into online retailers' decision-making regarding store branding partnerships with manufacturers under demand uncertainty. It highlights the importance of considering factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale prices to determine the optimal store branding strategy. The research contributes to understanding supply chain dynamics and suggests ways to enhance supply chain profit in online retail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naval Research Logistics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naval Research Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategic contract selection of an online retailer when implementing store branding
This article investigates the impact of demand uncertainty on online retailers' store branding partnerships with manufacturers. The study examines whether such partnerships, involving service effort to boost demand, are effective under uncertain conditions. The supply chain comprises an intermediary and a manufacturer, with the manufacturer facing a service cost disadvantage. The benchmark case is the manufacturer's sale through the agency (AG) contract with the intermediary. Using a two-period game-theoretic model, the study analyzes equilibrium prices, service efforts, and profits for the AG contract and two store branding contracts: original design manufacturer (ODM) and acquisition (AC). Findings show that the intermediary adopts store branding when its service cost advantage is significant. The intermediary exhibits a preference for the ODM contract when the commission fee falls within a moderate range. Conversely, when it deviates from this middle ground, the AC contract becomes more favorable. Within the AC contract framework, with low commission fees, specifically when the service cost advantage is not particularly pronounced and demand variability is high, the intermediary opts to trigger the acquisition option exclusively when the actual demand turns out to be substantial. With high commission fees, the intermediary avoids the acquisition option. These outcomes arise from balancing the double marginalization effect caused by factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale price. Implementing store branding through ODM or AC contracts enhances supply chain profit when it is optimal for the intermediary. We provide insights into online retailers' decision-making regarding store branding partnerships with manufacturers under demand uncertainty. It highlights the importance of considering factors like service cost advantage, service decentralization, and wholesale prices to determine the optimal store branding strategy. The research contributes to understanding supply chain dynamics and suggests ways to enhance supply chain profit in online retail.
期刊介绍:
Submissions that are most appropriate for NRL are papers addressing modeling and analysis of problems motivated by real-world applications; major methodological advances in operations research and applied statistics; and expository or survey pieces of lasting value. Areas represented include (but are not limited to) probability, statistics, simulation, optimization, game theory, quality, scheduling, reliability, maintenance, supply chain, decision analysis, and combat models. Special issues devoted to a single topic are published occasionally, and proposals for special issues are welcomed by the Editorial Board.