康纳-克鲁斯-奥布莱恩的 "失落之书

Q4 Social Sciences
Hugh Hanley
{"title":"康纳-克鲁斯-奥布莱恩的 \"失落之书","authors":"Hugh Hanley","doi":"10.1353/isia.0.a915223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconstructs the context in which the manuscript of Conor Cruise O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ came to be written and the unfruitful effort to get it into the public domain. Through an examination of documentary evidence held in the National Archives of Ireland, it is shown that previous accounts have been wide of the mark. The attribution of sole authorship of the manuscript to O’Brien is challenged, replacing it with the idea that the text was a collective endeavour. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that Joseph Brennan, a counsellor at the Irish Embassy in Washington, DC, rather than O’Brien was the driving force behind the supposed ‘lost book of O’Brien’, and especially in later efforts to revive the work. It is hoped that future scholars will make claims about O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ and its potential implications for his early thought with greater circumspection than has hitherto been the case.","PeriodicalId":39181,"journal":{"name":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","volume":"10 6","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Lost Book’ of Conor Cruise O’brien\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Hanley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/isia.0.a915223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reconstructs the context in which the manuscript of Conor Cruise O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ came to be written and the unfruitful effort to get it into the public domain. Through an examination of documentary evidence held in the National Archives of Ireland, it is shown that previous accounts have been wide of the mark. The attribution of sole authorship of the manuscript to O’Brien is challenged, replacing it with the idea that the text was a collective endeavour. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that Joseph Brennan, a counsellor at the Irish Embassy in Washington, DC, rather than O’Brien was the driving force behind the supposed ‘lost book of O’Brien’, and especially in later efforts to revive the work. It is hoped that future scholars will make claims about O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ and its potential implications for his early thought with greater circumspection than has hitherto been the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.0.a915223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.0.a915223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重建了康纳克鲁斯奥布莱恩的“丢失的书”手稿的写作背景,以及将其纳入公共领域的徒劳努力。通过对爱尔兰国家档案馆持有的文件证据的检查,表明之前的说法是大错特错的。奥布莱恩手稿唯一作者的归属受到挑战,取而代之的是文本是集体努力的想法。此外,它证明了约瑟夫·布伦南,爱尔兰驻华盛顿大使馆的顾问,而不是奥布莱恩,是所谓的“奥布莱恩丢失的书”背后的驱动力,特别是在后来努力恢复工作。人们希望未来的学者们能够以比以往更谨慎的态度,对奥布莱恩这本“丢失的书”及其对他早期思想的潜在影响提出主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘Lost Book’ of Conor Cruise O’brien
This article reconstructs the context in which the manuscript of Conor Cruise O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ came to be written and the unfruitful effort to get it into the public domain. Through an examination of documentary evidence held in the National Archives of Ireland, it is shown that previous accounts have been wide of the mark. The attribution of sole authorship of the manuscript to O’Brien is challenged, replacing it with the idea that the text was a collective endeavour. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that Joseph Brennan, a counsellor at the Irish Embassy in Washington, DC, rather than O’Brien was the driving force behind the supposed ‘lost book of O’Brien’, and especially in later efforts to revive the work. It is hoped that future scholars will make claims about O’Brien’s ‘lost book’ and its potential implications for his early thought with greater circumspection than has hitherto been the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Irish Studies in International Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信