瑞士对法官国家的恐惧为何毫无根据

P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo
{"title":"瑞士对法官国家的恐惧为何毫无根据","authors":"P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo","doi":"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.","PeriodicalId":496519,"journal":{"name":"ex/ante","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wieso die Schweizer Angst vor dem Richterstaat unbegründet ist\",\"authors\":\"P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo\",\"doi\":\"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ex/ante\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ex/ante\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ex/ante","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以德国为例,本文得出结论,具有全面审查能力的强有力的宪法管辖权不会导致破坏民主进程的法官国家。相反,这种宪法管辖保障了民主原则,特别是解决了少数人的关切。该文件表明,经常弥漫的对加强宪法管辖权的恐惧是没有根据的,因此应将其视为瑞士宪法制度进一步发展的一个可能概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wieso die Schweizer Angst vor dem Richterstaat unbegründet ist
Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信