种族主义与突尼斯民主的倒退

IF 2.4 4区历史学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Current History Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1525/curh.2023.122.848.348

Stephen J. King

{"title":"种族主义与突尼斯民主的倒退","authors":"Stephen J. King","doi":"10.1525/curh.2023.122.848.348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tunisia was the last surviving democracy to emerge from the Arab Spring, and had recently enacted legislation to combat racial discrimination. But President Kais Saied, since coming to power in a 2019 election, has returned the country to authoritarian rule. He has also rolled back progress on race relations, scapegoating sub-Saharan African migrants for Tunisia’s economic troubles. The failure of previous governments to root out corruption and consolidate the democratic transition with a new socioeconomic pact opened the way for a return to dictatorship.","PeriodicalId":45614,"journal":{"name":"Current History","volume":"184 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racism and the Rollback of Tunisian Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/curh.2023.122.848.348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tunisia was the last surviving democracy to emerge from the Arab Spring, and had recently enacted legislation to combat racial discrimination. But President Kais Saied, since coming to power in a 2019 election, has returned the country to authoritarian rule. He has also rolled back progress on race relations, scapegoating sub-Saharan African migrants for Tunisia’s economic troubles. The failure of previous governments to root out corruption and consolidate the democratic transition with a new socioeconomic pact opened the way for a return to dictatorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current History\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.848.348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.848.348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

突尼斯是阿拉伯之春后最后一个幸存的民主国家，最近颁布了打击种族歧视的立法。但总统凯伊斯·赛义德(Kais Saied)自2019年选举上台以来，已使该国恢复威权统治。他还在种族关系方面倒退，把突尼斯的经济困境归咎于撒哈拉以南非洲移民。前几届政府未能根除腐败，也未能通过新的社会经济协议巩固民主转型，这为回归独裁开辟了道路。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Racism and the Rollback of Tunisian Democracy

Tunisia was the last surviving democracy to emerge from the Arab Spring, and had recently enacted legislation to combat racial discrimination. But President Kais Saied, since coming to power in a 2019 election, has returned the country to authoritarian rule. He has also rolled back progress on race relations, scapegoating sub-Saharan African migrants for Tunisia’s economic troubles. The failure of previous governments to root out corruption and consolidate the democratic transition with a new socioeconomic pact opened the way for a return to dictatorship.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Current History enjoys a unique place among America"s most distinguished periodicals.The oldest US publication devoted exclusively to world affairs, Current History was founded by The New York Times in 1914 to provide detailed coverage of what was then known as the Great War. As a privately owned publication, Current History has continued a long tradition of groundbreaking coverage, providing a forum for leading scholars and specialists to analyze events and trends in every region of a rapidly changing world.