颠覆人类(不)安全:挑战忽视,让不透明显现出来

Q4 Social Sciences
Lorraine Elliott
{"title":"颠覆人类(不)安全:挑战忽视,让不透明显现出来","authors":"Lorraine Elliott","doi":"10.1353/isia.0.a915388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of human security, introduced to the global public policy lexicon in 1994, did two things. First, it challenged conventional and dominant state-centric approaches to security to rethink security in universal people-centred terms. Second, in its focus on human life and dignity, it called for a profound transition in security thinking to make all people everywhere matter. This article argues that the development of human security within the UN system has not sufficiently met these objectives. Through an analysis of three key human security sectors— food security, health security and disaster events—it reveals how conventional approaches to human security can be implicated in neglect, invisibility and marginalisation such that those already facing insecurity are made worse off still. A critical human security lens demonstrates that foregrounding recognition, solidarity and agency can help to expose invisibilities and encourage strategies to make people count.","PeriodicalId":39181,"journal":{"name":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","volume":" 43","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsettling Human (In)Security: Challenging Neglect and Making the Unapparent Appear\",\"authors\":\"Lorraine Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/isia.0.a915388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of human security, introduced to the global public policy lexicon in 1994, did two things. First, it challenged conventional and dominant state-centric approaches to security to rethink security in universal people-centred terms. Second, in its focus on human life and dignity, it called for a profound transition in security thinking to make all people everywhere matter. This article argues that the development of human security within the UN system has not sufficiently met these objectives. Through an analysis of three key human security sectors— food security, health security and disaster events—it reveals how conventional approaches to human security can be implicated in neglect, invisibility and marginalisation such that those already facing insecurity are made worse off still. A critical human security lens demonstrates that foregrounding recognition, solidarity and agency can help to expose invisibilities and encourage strategies to make people count.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"volume\":\" 43\",\"pages\":\"-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.0.a915388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.0.a915388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类安全的概念于1994年被引入全球公共政策词典,它做了两件事。首先,它挑战了传统的和占主导地位的以国家为中心的安全方法,以普遍以人民为中心的方式重新思考安全。第二,在关注人的生命和尊严方面,它呼吁深刻转变安全思想,使世界各地的所有人都重要。本文认为,联合国系统内人类安全的发展并没有充分实现这些目标。通过对三个关键的人类安全部门——粮食安全、卫生安全和灾害事件——的分析,它揭示了传统的人类安全方法是如何被忽视、忽视和边缘化的,从而使那些已经面临不安全的人的处境更加糟糕。关键的人类安全镜头表明,突出的承认、团结和能动性有助于揭露不可见的现象,并鼓励采取使人有价值的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unsettling Human (In)Security: Challenging Neglect and Making the Unapparent Appear
The concept of human security, introduced to the global public policy lexicon in 1994, did two things. First, it challenged conventional and dominant state-centric approaches to security to rethink security in universal people-centred terms. Second, in its focus on human life and dignity, it called for a profound transition in security thinking to make all people everywhere matter. This article argues that the development of human security within the UN system has not sufficiently met these objectives. Through an analysis of three key human security sectors— food security, health security and disaster events—it reveals how conventional approaches to human security can be implicated in neglect, invisibility and marginalisation such that those already facing insecurity are made worse off still. A critical human security lens demonstrates that foregrounding recognition, solidarity and agency can help to expose invisibilities and encourage strategies to make people count.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Irish Studies in International Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信