使用多模态信号检测患者非特异性癫痫发作的比较

Gustav Munk Sigsgaard, Ying Gu
{"title":"使用多模态信号检测患者非特异性癫痫发作的比较","authors":"Gustav Munk Sigsgaard,&nbsp;Ying Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Epilepsy is the neurological disorder affecting around 50 million people worldwide. It is characterized by recurrent and unpredictable seizures. Correctly counting seizure occurrences is crucial for diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, which will lower the risk of SUDEP (sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy). Many previous researches on patient-specific seizure detection have obtained a good performance but with limited practicability in clinical setting. On the other hand, patient non-specific detection is clinically practicable but with limited performance. This study aims to improve the performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by comparing performances among one modality based models and multi-modal based model. The study was based on clinical data from the open source Siena Scalp EEG Database, which consist of simultaneous EEG (Electroenchephalography) and ECG (electrocardiography) recording from 14 patients with focal epilepsy. The seizures were annotated by an epilepsy expert after a careful review of the clinical and EEG data of each patient. First, relevant signal pre-processing were performed, followed by features extraction. Then, machine learning approach based on random forest was employed for seizure detection with leave-one-patient-out cross validation scheme. EEG detector and ECG detector were separately trained with each signal. Multi-modal detector was based on combining EEG detector and ECG detector by the late integration approach with the Boolean operation “OR” strategy. The performances were compared among those three detectors and with the state of the art. The result has shown that the multi-modal detector achieved a sensitivity of 87.62% and outperformed the ECG detector (41.55%), the EEG detector (81.43%), and the state-of-the-art non-specific detectors. Notably, the ECG detector detected some seizures which EEG detector failed to detect. This indicated that the ECG signal was beneficial for increasing sensitivity. However, due to the “OR” fusion strategy, the multi-modal detector also inherited the false detections resulted from either EEG detector or ECG detector. The findings of the study demonstrate the potential of improving performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by multimodal data. It shows that the proposed method should be further validated on large database and further development should focus on lowering false detections before clinical application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000377/pdfft?md5=c598e2ae97012e6e72ecec3c0ff10bf5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528623000377-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of patient non-specific seizure detection using multi-modal signals\",\"authors\":\"Gustav Munk Sigsgaard,&nbsp;Ying Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Epilepsy is the neurological disorder affecting around 50 million people worldwide. It is characterized by recurrent and unpredictable seizures. Correctly counting seizure occurrences is crucial for diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, which will lower the risk of SUDEP (sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy). Many previous researches on patient-specific seizure detection have obtained a good performance but with limited practicability in clinical setting. On the other hand, patient non-specific detection is clinically practicable but with limited performance. This study aims to improve the performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by comparing performances among one modality based models and multi-modal based model. The study was based on clinical data from the open source Siena Scalp EEG Database, which consist of simultaneous EEG (Electroenchephalography) and ECG (electrocardiography) recording from 14 patients with focal epilepsy. The seizures were annotated by an epilepsy expert after a careful review of the clinical and EEG data of each patient. First, relevant signal pre-processing were performed, followed by features extraction. Then, machine learning approach based on random forest was employed for seizure detection with leave-one-patient-out cross validation scheme. EEG detector and ECG detector were separately trained with each signal. Multi-modal detector was based on combining EEG detector and ECG detector by the late integration approach with the Boolean operation “OR” strategy. The performances were compared among those three detectors and with the state of the art. The result has shown that the multi-modal detector achieved a sensitivity of 87.62% and outperformed the ECG detector (41.55%), the EEG detector (81.43%), and the state-of-the-art non-specific detectors. Notably, the ECG detector detected some seizures which EEG detector failed to detect. This indicated that the ECG signal was beneficial for increasing sensitivity. However, due to the “OR” fusion strategy, the multi-modal detector also inherited the false detections resulted from either EEG detector or ECG detector. The findings of the study demonstrate the potential of improving performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by multimodal data. It shows that the proposed method should be further validated on large database and further development should focus on lowering false detections before clinical application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience informatics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000377/pdfft?md5=c598e2ae97012e6e72ecec3c0ff10bf5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528623000377-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癫痫是一种影响全世界约5000万人的神经系统疾病。它的特点是反复发作和不可预测的癫痫发作。正确统计癫痫发作次数对于癫痫的诊断和治疗至关重要,这将降低SUDEP(癫痫猝死)的风险。以往许多针对患者的癫痫发作检测研究取得了良好的效果,但在临床应用中的实用性有限。另一方面,患者非特异性检测在临床上是可行的,但性能有限。本研究旨在通过比较基于单模态模型和基于多模态模型的性能来提高患者非特异性癫痫发作检测的性能。该研究基于开源的锡耶纳头皮脑电图数据库的临床数据,该数据库包括14例局灶性癫痫患者的同时脑电图(EEG)和心电图(ECG)记录。癫痫发作由癫痫专家在仔细审查每个患者的临床和脑电图数据后注释。首先进行相关信号预处理,然后进行特征提取。然后,采用基于随机森林的机器学习方法进行癫痫检测,并采用留一患者的交叉验证方案。对每个信号分别进行脑电检测器和心电检测器的训练。多模态检测器基于脑电检测器和心电检测器的后期积分方法和布尔运算“或”策略。对这三种探测器的性能进行了比较,并与最先进的探测器进行了比较。结果表明,多模态检测器的灵敏度为87.62%,优于ECG检测器(41.55%)、EEG检测器(81.43%)和最先进的非特异性检测器。值得注意的是,心电检测器检测到一些脑电图检测器未能检测到的癫痫发作。这表明心电信号有利于提高灵敏度。然而,由于采用“或”融合策略,多模态检测器也继承了脑电检测器或心电检测器的错误检测结果。研究结果表明,通过多模态数据改善患者非特异性癫痫发作检测的潜力。结果表明,该方法需要在大型数据库上进行进一步的验证,并在临床应用前着重降低误检率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of patient non-specific seizure detection using multi-modal signals

Epilepsy is the neurological disorder affecting around 50 million people worldwide. It is characterized by recurrent and unpredictable seizures. Correctly counting seizure occurrences is crucial for diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, which will lower the risk of SUDEP (sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy). Many previous researches on patient-specific seizure detection have obtained a good performance but with limited practicability in clinical setting. On the other hand, patient non-specific detection is clinically practicable but with limited performance. This study aims to improve the performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by comparing performances among one modality based models and multi-modal based model. The study was based on clinical data from the open source Siena Scalp EEG Database, which consist of simultaneous EEG (Electroenchephalography) and ECG (electrocardiography) recording from 14 patients with focal epilepsy. The seizures were annotated by an epilepsy expert after a careful review of the clinical and EEG data of each patient. First, relevant signal pre-processing were performed, followed by features extraction. Then, machine learning approach based on random forest was employed for seizure detection with leave-one-patient-out cross validation scheme. EEG detector and ECG detector were separately trained with each signal. Multi-modal detector was based on combining EEG detector and ECG detector by the late integration approach with the Boolean operation “OR” strategy. The performances were compared among those three detectors and with the state of the art. The result has shown that the multi-modal detector achieved a sensitivity of 87.62% and outperformed the ECG detector (41.55%), the EEG detector (81.43%), and the state-of-the-art non-specific detectors. Notably, the ECG detector detected some seizures which EEG detector failed to detect. This indicated that the ECG signal was beneficial for increasing sensitivity. However, due to the “OR” fusion strategy, the multi-modal detector also inherited the false detections resulted from either EEG detector or ECG detector. The findings of the study demonstrate the potential of improving performance of patient non-specific seizure detection by multimodal data. It shows that the proposed method should be further validated on large database and further development should focus on lowering false detections before clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信