恶性周围神经鞘瘤复发患者的治疗顺序和疗效分析

Lindy Zhang, K. Lemberg, A. Calizo, Ravi Varadhan, Alan H Siegel, Christian F. Meyer, J. Blakeley, C. A. Pratilas
{"title":"恶性周围神经鞘瘤复发患者的治疗顺序和疗效分析","authors":"Lindy Zhang, K. Lemberg, A. Calizo, Ravi Varadhan, Alan H Siegel, Christian F. Meyer, J. Blakeley, C. A. Pratilas","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdad156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas originating from cellular components within the nerve sheath. The incidence of MPNST is highest in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and MPNST is the leading cause of death for these individuals. Complete surgical resection is the only curative therapeutic option, but is often unfeasible due to tumor location, size, or presence of metastases. Evidence-based choices of chemotherapy for recurrent/ refractory MPNST remain elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience in treating patients with relapsed MPNST in order to describe patient outcomes related to salvage regimens.\n \n \n \n We conducted a retrospective electronic health record analysis of patients with MPNST who were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. We calculated time to progression (TTP) based on salvage chemotherapy regimens.\n \n \n \n Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. Upfront therapy included single or combined modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Forty-eight patients received at least one line of chemotherapy, which included 23 different regimens (excluding active clinical studies). Most patients (n=42, 87.5%) received a combination of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens and their TTP varied greatly, with irinotecan/ temozolomide-based regimens having the longest average TTP (255.5 days, among 4 patients).\n \n \n \n Patients with advanced or metastatic MPNST often succumb to their disease despite multiple lines of therapy. These data may be used as comparative information in decision-making for future patients and clinical trials.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":"119 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of treatment sequence and outcomes in patients with relapsed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors\",\"authors\":\"Lindy Zhang, K. Lemberg, A. Calizo, Ravi Varadhan, Alan H Siegel, Christian F. Meyer, J. Blakeley, C. A. Pratilas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdad156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas originating from cellular components within the nerve sheath. The incidence of MPNST is highest in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and MPNST is the leading cause of death for these individuals. Complete surgical resection is the only curative therapeutic option, but is often unfeasible due to tumor location, size, or presence of metastases. Evidence-based choices of chemotherapy for recurrent/ refractory MPNST remain elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience in treating patients with relapsed MPNST in order to describe patient outcomes related to salvage regimens.\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a retrospective electronic health record analysis of patients with MPNST who were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. We calculated time to progression (TTP) based on salvage chemotherapy regimens.\\n \\n \\n \\n Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. Upfront therapy included single or combined modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Forty-eight patients received at least one line of chemotherapy, which included 23 different regimens (excluding active clinical studies). Most patients (n=42, 87.5%) received a combination of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens and their TTP varied greatly, with irinotecan/ temozolomide-based regimens having the longest average TTP (255.5 days, among 4 patients).\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with advanced or metastatic MPNST often succumb to their disease despite multiple lines of therapy. These data may be used as comparative information in decision-making for future patients and clinical trials.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"volume\":\"119 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶性周围神经鞘肿瘤(MPNST)是一种侵袭性软组织肉瘤,起源于神经鞘内的细胞成分。MPNST在1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)患者中的发病率最高,MPNST是这些患者死亡的主要原因。完全手术切除是唯一的治疗选择,但由于肿瘤的位置,大小或转移的存在,通常是不可行的。复发/难治性MPNST的循证化疗选择仍然难以捉摸。为了解决这一差距,我们对我们治疗复发性MPNST患者的机构经验进行了回顾性分析,以描述与挽救方案相关的患者结果。我们对2010年1月至2021年6月在约翰霍普金斯医院接受治疗的MPNST患者进行了回顾性电子健康记录分析。我们根据挽救性化疗方案计算进展时间(TTP)。65名患者被纳入分析。前期治疗包括单一或联合手术、化疗或放疗。48名患者接受了至少一种化疗,其中包括23种不同的方案(不包括正在进行的临床研究)。大多数患者(n= 42,87.5%)接受阿霉素、异环磷酰胺或依托泊苷联合一线化疗。挽救性化疗方案及其TTP差异很大,以伊立替康/替莫唑胺为基础的方案平均TTP最长(4例患者中255.5天)。晚期或转移性MPNST患者尽管接受了多种治疗,但往往还是死于疾病。这些数据可以作为未来患者和临床试验决策的比较信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of treatment sequence and outcomes in patients with relapsed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas originating from cellular components within the nerve sheath. The incidence of MPNST is highest in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and MPNST is the leading cause of death for these individuals. Complete surgical resection is the only curative therapeutic option, but is often unfeasible due to tumor location, size, or presence of metastases. Evidence-based choices of chemotherapy for recurrent/ refractory MPNST remain elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience in treating patients with relapsed MPNST in order to describe patient outcomes related to salvage regimens. We conducted a retrospective electronic health record analysis of patients with MPNST who were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. We calculated time to progression (TTP) based on salvage chemotherapy regimens. Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. Upfront therapy included single or combined modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Forty-eight patients received at least one line of chemotherapy, which included 23 different regimens (excluding active clinical studies). Most patients (n=42, 87.5%) received a combination of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens and their TTP varied greatly, with irinotecan/ temozolomide-based regimens having the longest average TTP (255.5 days, among 4 patients). Patients with advanced or metastatic MPNST often succumb to their disease despite multiple lines of therapy. These data may be used as comparative information in decision-making for future patients and clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信