欧洲未来生物入侵设想方案

IF 4.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
C. Pérez‐Granados, Bernd Lenzner, M. Golivets, Wolf‐Christian Saul, J. Jeschke, F. Essl, Garry D. Peterson, L. Rutting, G. Latombe, T. Adriaens, David C. Aldridge, S. Bacher, R. Bernardo‐Madrid, Lluís Brotons, François Díaz, Belinda Gallardo, P. Genovesi, Pablo González‐Moreno, I. Kühn, P. Kutleša, Brian Leung, Chunlong Liu, K. Pagitz, Teresa Pastor, A. Pauchard, W. Rabitsch, Peter Robertson, Helen E. Roy, H. Seebens, W. Solarz, U. Starfinger, Rob Tanner, Montserrat Vilà, N. Roura‐Pascual
{"title":"欧洲未来生物入侵设想方案","authors":"C. Pérez‐Granados, Bernd Lenzner, M. Golivets, Wolf‐Christian Saul, J. Jeschke, F. Essl, Garry D. Peterson, L. Rutting, G. Latombe, T. Adriaens, David C. Aldridge, S. Bacher, R. Bernardo‐Madrid, Lluís Brotons, François Díaz, Belinda Gallardo, P. Genovesi, Pablo González‐Moreno, I. Kühn, P. Kutleša, Brian Leung, Chunlong Liu, K. Pagitz, Teresa Pastor, A. Pauchard, W. Rabitsch, Peter Robertson, Helen E. Roy, H. Seebens, W. Solarz, U. Starfinger, Rob Tanner, Montserrat Vilà, N. Roura‐Pascual","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nInvasive alien species are one of the major threats to global biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, nature's contributions to people and human health. While scenarios about potential future developments have been available for other global change drivers for quite some time, we largely lack an understanding of how biological invasions might unfold in the future across spatial scales.\n\nBased on previous work on global invasion scenarios, we developed a workflow to downscale global scenarios to a regional and policy‐relevant context. We applied this workflow at the European scale to create four European scenarios of biological invasions until 2050 that consider different environmental, socio‐economic and socio‐cultural trajectories, namely the European Alien Species Narratives (Eur‐ASNs).\n\nWe compared the Eur‐ASNs with their previously published global counterparts (Global‐ASNs), assessing changes in 26 scenario variables. This assessment showed a high consistency between global and European scenarios in the logic and assumptions of the scenario variables. However, several discrepancies in scenario variable trends were detected that could be attributed to scale differences. This suggests that the workflow is able to capture scale‐dependent differences across scenarios.\n\nWe also compared the Global‐ and Eur‐ASNs with the widely used Global and European Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), a set of scenarios developed in the context of climate change to capture different future socio‐economic trends. Our comparison showed considerable divergences in the scenario space occupied by the different scenarios, with overall larger differences between the ASNs and SSPs than across scales (global vs. European) within the scenario initiatives.\n\nGiven the differences between the ASNs and SSPs, it seems that the SSPs do not adequately capture the scenario space relevant to understanding the complex future of biological invasions. This underlines the importance of developing independent but complementary scenarios focussed on biological invasions. The downscaling workflow we implemented and presented here provides a tool to develop such scenarios across different regions and contexts. This is a major step towards an improved understanding of all major drivers of global change, including biological invasions.\n\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":52850,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":"122 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European scenarios for future biological invasions\",\"authors\":\"C. Pérez‐Granados, Bernd Lenzner, M. Golivets, Wolf‐Christian Saul, J. Jeschke, F. Essl, Garry D. Peterson, L. Rutting, G. Latombe, T. Adriaens, David C. Aldridge, S. Bacher, R. Bernardo‐Madrid, Lluís Brotons, François Díaz, Belinda Gallardo, P. Genovesi, Pablo González‐Moreno, I. Kühn, P. Kutleša, Brian Leung, Chunlong Liu, K. Pagitz, Teresa Pastor, A. Pauchard, W. Rabitsch, Peter Robertson, Helen E. Roy, H. Seebens, W. Solarz, U. Starfinger, Rob Tanner, Montserrat Vilà, N. Roura‐Pascual\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pan3.10567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nInvasive alien species are one of the major threats to global biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, nature's contributions to people and human health. While scenarios about potential future developments have been available for other global change drivers for quite some time, we largely lack an understanding of how biological invasions might unfold in the future across spatial scales.\\n\\nBased on previous work on global invasion scenarios, we developed a workflow to downscale global scenarios to a regional and policy‐relevant context. We applied this workflow at the European scale to create four European scenarios of biological invasions until 2050 that consider different environmental, socio‐economic and socio‐cultural trajectories, namely the European Alien Species Narratives (Eur‐ASNs).\\n\\nWe compared the Eur‐ASNs with their previously published global counterparts (Global‐ASNs), assessing changes in 26 scenario variables. This assessment showed a high consistency between global and European scenarios in the logic and assumptions of the scenario variables. However, several discrepancies in scenario variable trends were detected that could be attributed to scale differences. This suggests that the workflow is able to capture scale‐dependent differences across scenarios.\\n\\nWe also compared the Global‐ and Eur‐ASNs with the widely used Global and European Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), a set of scenarios developed in the context of climate change to capture different future socio‐economic trends. Our comparison showed considerable divergences in the scenario space occupied by the different scenarios, with overall larger differences between the ASNs and SSPs than across scales (global vs. European) within the scenario initiatives.\\n\\nGiven the differences between the ASNs and SSPs, it seems that the SSPs do not adequately capture the scenario space relevant to understanding the complex future of biological invasions. This underlines the importance of developing independent but complementary scenarios focussed on biological invasions. The downscaling workflow we implemented and presented here provides a tool to develop such scenarios across different regions and contexts. This is a major step towards an improved understanding of all major drivers of global change, including biological invasions.\\n\\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"People and Nature\",\"volume\":\"122 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"People and Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10567\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外来入侵物种是对全球生物多样性、生态系统完整性、大自然对人类和人类健康的贡献的主要威胁之一。虽然关于其他全球变化驱动因素的潜在未来发展的情景已经有一段时间了,但我们在很大程度上缺乏对未来生物入侵如何在空间尺度上展开的理解。基于之前对全球入侵情景的研究,我们开发了一个工作流,将全球情景缩小到与区域和政策相关的背景下。我们在欧洲范围内应用这一工作流程,创建了四种欧洲生物入侵情景,直到2050年,考虑了不同的环境、社会经济和社会文化轨迹,即欧洲外来物种叙事(Eur - asn)。我们将Eur - asn与之前发表的全球对应版本(global - asn)进行了比较,评估了26个场景变量的变化。这一评估表明,全球和欧洲情景在情景变量的逻辑和假设方面高度一致。然而,在情景变量趋势中发现了一些差异,这些差异可归因于尺度差异。这表明工作流能够捕获不同场景的规模相关差异。我们还将全球-和欧洲- asn与广泛使用的全球和欧洲共享社会经济路径(ssp)进行了比较,ssp是在气候变化背景下开发的一组情景,以捕捉不同的未来社会经济趋势。我们的比较显示,不同情景所占据的情景空间存在相当大的差异,在情景计划中,asn和ssp之间的总体差异大于跨尺度(全球与欧洲)的差异。鉴于asn和ssp之间的差异,ssp似乎不能充分捕捉与理解生物入侵的复杂未来相关的情景空间。这强调了开发独立但补充性的方案以生物入侵为重点的重要性。我们在这里实现并展示的缩减工作流程提供了一种工具,可以跨不同区域和上下文开发此类场景。这是朝着更好地了解包括生物入侵在内的全球变化的所有主要驱动因素迈出的重要一步。在《华尔街日报》博客上阅读免费的《简明语言摘要》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European scenarios for future biological invasions
Invasive alien species are one of the major threats to global biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, nature's contributions to people and human health. While scenarios about potential future developments have been available for other global change drivers for quite some time, we largely lack an understanding of how biological invasions might unfold in the future across spatial scales. Based on previous work on global invasion scenarios, we developed a workflow to downscale global scenarios to a regional and policy‐relevant context. We applied this workflow at the European scale to create four European scenarios of biological invasions until 2050 that consider different environmental, socio‐economic and socio‐cultural trajectories, namely the European Alien Species Narratives (Eur‐ASNs). We compared the Eur‐ASNs with their previously published global counterparts (Global‐ASNs), assessing changes in 26 scenario variables. This assessment showed a high consistency between global and European scenarios in the logic and assumptions of the scenario variables. However, several discrepancies in scenario variable trends were detected that could be attributed to scale differences. This suggests that the workflow is able to capture scale‐dependent differences across scenarios. We also compared the Global‐ and Eur‐ASNs with the widely used Global and European Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), a set of scenarios developed in the context of climate change to capture different future socio‐economic trends. Our comparison showed considerable divergences in the scenario space occupied by the different scenarios, with overall larger differences between the ASNs and SSPs than across scales (global vs. European) within the scenario initiatives. Given the differences between the ASNs and SSPs, it seems that the SSPs do not adequately capture the scenario space relevant to understanding the complex future of biological invasions. This underlines the importance of developing independent but complementary scenarios focussed on biological invasions. The downscaling workflow we implemented and presented here provides a tool to develop such scenarios across different regions and contexts. This is a major step towards an improved understanding of all major drivers of global change, including biological invasions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
People and Nature
People and Nature Multiple-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
103
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信