{"title":"胎动减少妇女的围产期结局","authors":"Ahang Dizhwar Khalid, Srwa Ismael Khalid","doi":"10.56056/amj.2023.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Reduced fetal movement is a reason for concern in both mothers and clinicians. The objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and perinatal outcomes in women with decreased fetal movements. Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 489 pregnant women in Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city from October 2021 to December 2022. They were assigned into two groups, cases consisting of 244 women with a perception of reduced fetal movements and a control group including 245 women with good fetal movements. perinatal outcome was compared between the two groups. Results: The majority (59.5%) of the study participants were term pregnancies (? 37weeks). Among women with RFM, 32.4% were nulliparous and 59% were multiparous comparing to control group (26.9% and 63.7%, respectively). A higher proportion of women with reduced fetal movements had gestational diabetes (34%), and preeclampsia (40.2%), compared to women of Group II with the rate of 15.5% and 21.2% respectively. The rate of cesarean section was significantly higher among cases than controls (45% vs. 24.9%, respectively). The rate of abnormal Doppler among Group I women was higher than in Group II women (26.2% versus 2.9%). Significantly higher rate of neonates in Group I had low APGAR score. Conclusions: Perception of reduced fetal movements is a reason for woman to contact their healthcare providers. The poor perinatal outcome is more evident in women with reduced fetal movements.","PeriodicalId":314832,"journal":{"name":"Advanced medical journal","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal outcome of women presenting with reduced fetal movements\",\"authors\":\"Ahang Dizhwar Khalid, Srwa Ismael Khalid\",\"doi\":\"10.56056/amj.2023.217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives: Reduced fetal movement is a reason for concern in both mothers and clinicians. The objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and perinatal outcomes in women with decreased fetal movements. Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 489 pregnant women in Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city from October 2021 to December 2022. They were assigned into two groups, cases consisting of 244 women with a perception of reduced fetal movements and a control group including 245 women with good fetal movements. perinatal outcome was compared between the two groups. Results: The majority (59.5%) of the study participants were term pregnancies (? 37weeks). Among women with RFM, 32.4% were nulliparous and 59% were multiparous comparing to control group (26.9% and 63.7%, respectively). A higher proportion of women with reduced fetal movements had gestational diabetes (34%), and preeclampsia (40.2%), compared to women of Group II with the rate of 15.5% and 21.2% respectively. The rate of cesarean section was significantly higher among cases than controls (45% vs. 24.9%, respectively). The rate of abnormal Doppler among Group I women was higher than in Group II women (26.2% versus 2.9%). Significantly higher rate of neonates in Group I had low APGAR score. Conclusions: Perception of reduced fetal movements is a reason for woman to contact their healthcare providers. The poor perinatal outcome is more evident in women with reduced fetal movements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced medical journal\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2023.217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2023.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:胎儿运动减少是母亲和临床医生关注的一个原因。本研究的目的是评估妊娠特征和围产期结局的妇女减少胎动。方法:对2021年10月至2022年12月在埃尔比勒市妇产教学医院就诊的489例孕妇进行病例对照研究。她们被分为两组,一组是244名感觉胎动减少的妇女,另一组是245名胎动良好的妇女。比较两组围产儿结局。结果:大多数(59.5%)的研究参与者是足月妊娠(?37周)。与对照组(分别为26.9%和63.7%)相比,RFM患者无产32.4%,多产59%。胎动减少的妇女患妊娠期糖尿病(34%)和先兆子痫(40.2%)的比例高于II组(分别为15.5%和21.2%)。病例剖宫产率明显高于对照组(分别为45%和24.9%)。多普勒异常率组ⅰ高于组ⅱ(26.2% vs 2.9%)。第一组新生儿APGAR评分低的比例明显高于对照组。结论:胎儿运动减少的感觉是妇女联系医疗保健提供者的一个原因。不良的围产期结局在胎动减少的妇女中更为明显。
Perinatal outcome of women presenting with reduced fetal movements
Background and objectives: Reduced fetal movement is a reason for concern in both mothers and clinicians. The objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and perinatal outcomes in women with decreased fetal movements. Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 489 pregnant women in Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city from October 2021 to December 2022. They were assigned into two groups, cases consisting of 244 women with a perception of reduced fetal movements and a control group including 245 women with good fetal movements. perinatal outcome was compared between the two groups. Results: The majority (59.5%) of the study participants were term pregnancies (? 37weeks). Among women with RFM, 32.4% were nulliparous and 59% were multiparous comparing to control group (26.9% and 63.7%, respectively). A higher proportion of women with reduced fetal movements had gestational diabetes (34%), and preeclampsia (40.2%), compared to women of Group II with the rate of 15.5% and 21.2% respectively. The rate of cesarean section was significantly higher among cases than controls (45% vs. 24.9%, respectively). The rate of abnormal Doppler among Group I women was higher than in Group II women (26.2% versus 2.9%). Significantly higher rate of neonates in Group I had low APGAR score. Conclusions: Perception of reduced fetal movements is a reason for woman to contact their healthcare providers. The poor perinatal outcome is more evident in women with reduced fetal movements.