{"title":"人工神经网络在表面粗糙度预测中的应用:比较研究","authors":"Habeeb Al-Ani","doi":"10.37868/sei.v5i2.id216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface roughness is a key parameter to consider in the machining of aluminum alloy. It is rendered as one of the important determinants of the performance of mechanical instruments or components. Owing to its excellent mechanical properties, and ease of machinability, Aluminum 6061 (Al6061) is rendered a popular choice in many industries. Achieving a desired surface finish is crucial for the performance and longevity of machined components. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) model versus the response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061. ANN performed better than RSM in the prediction of surface roughness (A20 index 0.93 and 0.86 for ANN and RSM models respectively). MAPE and sMAPE were also found to be lower in the ANN model compared with the RSM model (8.06 versus 9.69, and 0.039 versus 0.047 respectively) indicating that the ANN model had a better predictive performance compared with the RSM model. Both ANN and RSM models showed that cutting speed and feed rate were the most important determinants of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061 in other words to achieve a smoother surface during the turning process of Al6061 high cutting speed and low feed rate should be used. The findings of this study reflect the potential utility of ANN in the prediction and subsequently optimizing cutting parameters to achieve a smoother surface.","PeriodicalId":428933,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Engineering and Innovation","volume":"120 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial neural network in the prediction of surface roughness: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Habeeb Al-Ani\",\"doi\":\"10.37868/sei.v5i2.id216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surface roughness is a key parameter to consider in the machining of aluminum alloy. It is rendered as one of the important determinants of the performance of mechanical instruments or components. Owing to its excellent mechanical properties, and ease of machinability, Aluminum 6061 (Al6061) is rendered a popular choice in many industries. Achieving a desired surface finish is crucial for the performance and longevity of machined components. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) model versus the response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061. ANN performed better than RSM in the prediction of surface roughness (A20 index 0.93 and 0.86 for ANN and RSM models respectively). MAPE and sMAPE were also found to be lower in the ANN model compared with the RSM model (8.06 versus 9.69, and 0.039 versus 0.047 respectively) indicating that the ANN model had a better predictive performance compared with the RSM model. Both ANN and RSM models showed that cutting speed and feed rate were the most important determinants of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061 in other words to achieve a smoother surface during the turning process of Al6061 high cutting speed and low feed rate should be used. The findings of this study reflect the potential utility of ANN in the prediction and subsequently optimizing cutting parameters to achieve a smoother surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Engineering and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"120 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Engineering and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v5i2.id216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Engineering and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v5i2.id216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial neural network in the prediction of surface roughness: A comparative study
Surface roughness is a key parameter to consider in the machining of aluminum alloy. It is rendered as one of the important determinants of the performance of mechanical instruments or components. Owing to its excellent mechanical properties, and ease of machinability, Aluminum 6061 (Al6061) is rendered a popular choice in many industries. Achieving a desired surface finish is crucial for the performance and longevity of machined components. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) model versus the response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061. ANN performed better than RSM in the prediction of surface roughness (A20 index 0.93 and 0.86 for ANN and RSM models respectively). MAPE and sMAPE were also found to be lower in the ANN model compared with the RSM model (8.06 versus 9.69, and 0.039 versus 0.047 respectively) indicating that the ANN model had a better predictive performance compared with the RSM model. Both ANN and RSM models showed that cutting speed and feed rate were the most important determinants of surface roughness in the turning process of Al6061 in other words to achieve a smoother surface during the turning process of Al6061 high cutting speed and low feed rate should be used. The findings of this study reflect the potential utility of ANN in the prediction and subsequently optimizing cutting parameters to achieve a smoother surface.