使用药用大麻的决策经验:膝关节骨关节炎患者及其护理人员的观点。

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Wijitra Sena, P. Kessomboon, Malinee Pisutthigoson, Wongjan Poolpoem, Thanamet Thaenkham, Khachornsak Seevathee
{"title":"使用药用大麻的决策经验:膝关节骨关节炎患者及其护理人员的观点。","authors":"Wijitra Sena, P. Kessomboon, Malinee Pisutthigoson, Wongjan Poolpoem, Thanamet Thaenkham, Khachornsak Seevathee","doi":"10.59796/jcst.v14n1.2024.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the experience of making a decision to use medicinal cannabis among patients with knee osteoarthritis and their care providers. This qualitative research used a phenomenological approach to collect information by purposive sampling. Informants included 7 patients with knee osteoarthritis and 18 care providers in Khon Kaen municipality. Data were collected from June until December 2021using in-depth interviews, field records and participatory observation. After 6 months of data collection, the modified Colaizzi’s seven-step method was used for data analysis. The results show that the content from all informants can be categorized into 7 distinct themes about their decision-making on using medicinal cannabis (MC): 1) The needs for MC: Recognizing the painful nature of osteoarthritic pain and the limited treatment options available 2) Beliefs and attitudes towards MC with two sub-themes identified as 2.1) Belief in the MC’s efficacy that denotes informants’ positive perception and 2.2) Attitudes towards MC that show doubt, hesitation, or lack of confidence in MC’s effectiveness 3) Evidence on efficacy and safety of MC products: Considering cannabis as a viable treatment option 4) Trustworthiness of information and communication about MC. 5) Influence of other people: Three key influencers in the decision-making process including 5.1) Patients themselves 5.2) Friends and peers 5.3) Doctors and healthcare professionals 6) Legitimacy status of MC and 7) Product designs regarding forms of therapeutic use. The findings yielded 7 distinct themes concerning the decision to use medicinal cannabis (MC). The most important component is the need for pain relief among knee osteoarthritis patients. They clearly need MC for relieving their symptoms. Evidence on efficacy and legalization status of MC are also the main factors, while other 4 components are less important or not the vital factors for making decision on MC’s utilization. Policies on MC need to address these factors.","PeriodicalId":36369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","volume":"47 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making Experiences to use Medicinal Cannabis: Perspectives from Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Their Care Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Wijitra Sena, P. Kessomboon, Malinee Pisutthigoson, Wongjan Poolpoem, Thanamet Thaenkham, Khachornsak Seevathee\",\"doi\":\"10.59796/jcst.v14n1.2024.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the experience of making a decision to use medicinal cannabis among patients with knee osteoarthritis and their care providers. This qualitative research used a phenomenological approach to collect information by purposive sampling. Informants included 7 patients with knee osteoarthritis and 18 care providers in Khon Kaen municipality. Data were collected from June until December 2021using in-depth interviews, field records and participatory observation. After 6 months of data collection, the modified Colaizzi’s seven-step method was used for data analysis. The results show that the content from all informants can be categorized into 7 distinct themes about their decision-making on using medicinal cannabis (MC): 1) The needs for MC: Recognizing the painful nature of osteoarthritic pain and the limited treatment options available 2) Beliefs and attitudes towards MC with two sub-themes identified as 2.1) Belief in the MC’s efficacy that denotes informants’ positive perception and 2.2) Attitudes towards MC that show doubt, hesitation, or lack of confidence in MC’s effectiveness 3) Evidence on efficacy and safety of MC products: Considering cannabis as a viable treatment option 4) Trustworthiness of information and communication about MC. 5) Influence of other people: Three key influencers in the decision-making process including 5.1) Patients themselves 5.2) Friends and peers 5.3) Doctors and healthcare professionals 6) Legitimacy status of MC and 7) Product designs regarding forms of therapeutic use. The findings yielded 7 distinct themes concerning the decision to use medicinal cannabis (MC). The most important component is the need for pain relief among knee osteoarthritis patients. They clearly need MC for relieving their symptoms. Evidence on efficacy and legalization status of MC are also the main factors, while other 4 components are less important or not the vital factors for making decision on MC’s utilization. Policies on MC need to address these factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"47 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v14n1.2024.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v14n1.2024.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查的经验,作出决定使用药用大麻患者膝骨关节炎和他们的护理提供者。本定性研究采用现象学方法,通过有目的的抽样来收集信息。调查对象包括孔敬市7名膝关节骨关节炎患者和18名护理人员。数据收集于2021年6月至12月,采用深度访谈、实地记录和参与式观察。数据收集6个月后,采用改进的Colaizzi七步法进行数据分析。结果表明,所有被调查者关于药用大麻使用决策的内容可分为7个不同的主题:1)药用大麻的需求;认识到骨关节炎疼痛的痛苦本质和有限的治疗选择2)对MC的信念和态度,确定为两个子主题:2.1)对MC的有效性的信念,表明被调查者的积极看法;2.2)对MC的有效性表现出怀疑、犹豫或缺乏信心的态度3)对MC产品有效性和安全性的证据;考虑大麻作为一种可行的治疗选择4)关于大麻的信息和沟通的可信度。5)其他人的影响:决策过程中的三个关键影响因素,包括5.1)患者自己5.2)朋友和同龄人5.3)医生和医疗保健专业人员6)大麻的合法性地位和7)关于治疗使用形式的产品设计。调查结果产生了关于使用医用大麻决定的7个不同主题。最重要的部分是膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛缓解需求。他们显然需要MC来缓解症状。药效证据和大麻合法化状况也是影响大麻使用的主要因素,而其他4个因素的重要性较低或不是决定大麻使用的关键因素。MC政策需要解决这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-Making Experiences to use Medicinal Cannabis: Perspectives from Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Their Care Providers.
This study investigated the experience of making a decision to use medicinal cannabis among patients with knee osteoarthritis and their care providers. This qualitative research used a phenomenological approach to collect information by purposive sampling. Informants included 7 patients with knee osteoarthritis and 18 care providers in Khon Kaen municipality. Data were collected from June until December 2021using in-depth interviews, field records and participatory observation. After 6 months of data collection, the modified Colaizzi’s seven-step method was used for data analysis. The results show that the content from all informants can be categorized into 7 distinct themes about their decision-making on using medicinal cannabis (MC): 1) The needs for MC: Recognizing the painful nature of osteoarthritic pain and the limited treatment options available 2) Beliefs and attitudes towards MC with two sub-themes identified as 2.1) Belief in the MC’s efficacy that denotes informants’ positive perception and 2.2) Attitudes towards MC that show doubt, hesitation, or lack of confidence in MC’s effectiveness 3) Evidence on efficacy and safety of MC products: Considering cannabis as a viable treatment option 4) Trustworthiness of information and communication about MC. 5) Influence of other people: Three key influencers in the decision-making process including 5.1) Patients themselves 5.2) Friends and peers 5.3) Doctors and healthcare professionals 6) Legitimacy status of MC and 7) Product designs regarding forms of therapeutic use. The findings yielded 7 distinct themes concerning the decision to use medicinal cannabis (MC). The most important component is the need for pain relief among knee osteoarthritis patients. They clearly need MC for relieving their symptoms. Evidence on efficacy and legalization status of MC are also the main factors, while other 4 components are less important or not the vital factors for making decision on MC’s utilization. Policies on MC need to address these factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Science and Technology
Journal of Current Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信