营销文献的轮廓:营销文献的文本、背景、观点、研究视野、解释和影响

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Terry Clark, Thomas Martin Key, Carol Azab
{"title":"营销文献的轮廓:营销文献的文本、背景、观点、研究视野、解释和影响","authors":"Terry Clark,&nbsp;Thomas Martin Key,&nbsp;Carol Azab","doi":"10.1007/s13162-023-00267-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The marketing literature is the elemental material out of which all of our academic articles are created. It is not possible to conduct an empirical study in academic marketing without referencing the theories, arguments, prior studies, and findings of our literature. While observation, scale development and measurement are all signature features of modern academic marketing, they can only be intelligible when contextualized in terms of the history, structure, and development of theory found in our literature. Despite the fact that 75% of the most cited marketing articles are literature-based, conceptual/theoretical in nature (Clark &amp; Key in <i>AMS Review</i>, 11, 416–431, 2021), our discipline has moved in a methodological/mathematical modelling direction (Yadav, 2010; Key et al., 2020). Yet this move has not increased the influence of the field as many expected. Despite this situation, other than a few articles on the <i>literature review</i>, the marketing literature per se has received little attention. In light of this, the purposes of this paper, are to: 1) extend the limited work on the nature and uses of the marketing literature; 2) encourage the development of studies that have proven influential, namely conceptual/theoretical articles; 3) provide materials for doctoral seminars suitable to nurturing a deeper appreciation of the complexities of our literature and its application in theory development; and 4) provide fresh perspectives for marketing scholars in the best uses of our literature. Borrowing from fields that specialize in the study of academic literatures, the authors identify several important features of the marketing literature, including: how our literature <i>as texts</i> differs from spoken research presentations and why this matters; demonstrating why an article’s context, point-of-view, and research horizons are critical to a reasonable interpretation and use of articles; and how academic marketing articles gain influence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"13 3-4","pages":"232 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contours of the marketing literature: Text, context, point-of-view, research horizons, interpretation, and influence in marketing\",\"authors\":\"Terry Clark,&nbsp;Thomas Martin Key,&nbsp;Carol Azab\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13162-023-00267-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The marketing literature is the elemental material out of which all of our academic articles are created. It is not possible to conduct an empirical study in academic marketing without referencing the theories, arguments, prior studies, and findings of our literature. While observation, scale development and measurement are all signature features of modern academic marketing, they can only be intelligible when contextualized in terms of the history, structure, and development of theory found in our literature. Despite the fact that 75% of the most cited marketing articles are literature-based, conceptual/theoretical in nature (Clark &amp; Key in <i>AMS Review</i>, 11, 416–431, 2021), our discipline has moved in a methodological/mathematical modelling direction (Yadav, 2010; Key et al., 2020). Yet this move has not increased the influence of the field as many expected. Despite this situation, other than a few articles on the <i>literature review</i>, the marketing literature per se has received little attention. In light of this, the purposes of this paper, are to: 1) extend the limited work on the nature and uses of the marketing literature; 2) encourage the development of studies that have proven influential, namely conceptual/theoretical articles; 3) provide materials for doctoral seminars suitable to nurturing a deeper appreciation of the complexities of our literature and its application in theory development; and 4) provide fresh perspectives for marketing scholars in the best uses of our literature. Borrowing from fields that specialize in the study of academic literatures, the authors identify several important features of the marketing literature, including: how our literature <i>as texts</i> differs from spoken research presentations and why this matters; demonstrating why an article’s context, point-of-view, and research horizons are critical to a reasonable interpretation and use of articles; and how academic marketing articles gain influence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMS Review\",\"volume\":\"13 3-4\",\"pages\":\"232 - 249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMS Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-023-00267-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-023-00267-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

营销文献是我们创作所有学术文章的基本素材。如果不参考我们文献中的理论、论点、先前研究和结论,就不可能在学术营销领域开展实证研究。虽然观察、量表制定和测量都是现代学术营销的标志性特征,但只有在我们的文献中找到理论的历史、结构和发展脉络时,才能理解这些特征。尽管在被引用次数最多的市场营销文章中,有 75% 是基于文献的概念/理论性文章(Clark & Key in AMS Review, 11, 416-431, 2021),但我们的学科已经朝着方法/数学建模的方向发展(Yadav, 2010; Key et al.)然而,这一举动并没有像许多人预期的那样提高该领域的影响力。尽管如此,除了几篇关于文献综述的文章外,营销文献本身很少受到关注。有鉴于此,本文旨在1)扩展有关市场营销文献的性质和用途的有限工作;2)鼓励发展已被证明具有影响力的研究,即概念/理论文章;3)为博士生研讨会提供适合的材料,以培养对我们文献的复杂性及其在理论发展中的应用的更深刻的理解;以及 4)为市场营销学者在最好地利用我们的文献方面提供新的视角。作者借鉴了专门研究学术文献的领域,指出了营销文献的几个重要特征,包括:我们的文献作为文本与口头研究陈述有何不同,以及为什么这一点很重要;说明为什么文章的背景、观点和研究视野对于合理解释和使用文章至关重要;以及学术营销文章如何获得影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contours of the marketing literature: Text, context, point-of-view, research horizons, interpretation, and influence in marketing

The marketing literature is the elemental material out of which all of our academic articles are created. It is not possible to conduct an empirical study in academic marketing without referencing the theories, arguments, prior studies, and findings of our literature. While observation, scale development and measurement are all signature features of modern academic marketing, they can only be intelligible when contextualized in terms of the history, structure, and development of theory found in our literature. Despite the fact that 75% of the most cited marketing articles are literature-based, conceptual/theoretical in nature (Clark & Key in AMS Review, 11, 416–431, 2021), our discipline has moved in a methodological/mathematical modelling direction (Yadav, 2010; Key et al., 2020). Yet this move has not increased the influence of the field as many expected. Despite this situation, other than a few articles on the literature review, the marketing literature per se has received little attention. In light of this, the purposes of this paper, are to: 1) extend the limited work on the nature and uses of the marketing literature; 2) encourage the development of studies that have proven influential, namely conceptual/theoretical articles; 3) provide materials for doctoral seminars suitable to nurturing a deeper appreciation of the complexities of our literature and its application in theory development; and 4) provide fresh perspectives for marketing scholars in the best uses of our literature. Borrowing from fields that specialize in the study of academic literatures, the authors identify several important features of the marketing literature, including: how our literature as texts differs from spoken research presentations and why this matters; demonstrating why an article’s context, point-of-view, and research horizons are critical to a reasonable interpretation and use of articles; and how academic marketing articles gain influence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信