施瓦茨贝叶斯信息标准:贝叶斯-SEM 与偏最小二乘-SEM 之间的模型选择

IF 1.1 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Reny Rian Marliana, Maya Suhayati, Sri Bekti Handayani Ningsih
{"title":"施瓦茨贝叶斯信息标准:贝叶斯-SEM 与偏最小二乘-SEM 之间的模型选择","authors":"Reny Rian Marliana, Maya Suhayati, Sri Bekti Handayani Ningsih","doi":"10.18187/pjsor.v19i4.4146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this academic work a comparison between a Bayesian-Structural Equation Modelling (B-SEM) and a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on a relationship amongst self-directed learning readiness (SDLR), E-learning readiness, and learning motivation of undergraduate students throughout the outbreak of Covid-19 is studied. The B-SEM is built using prior distribution i.e., inverse-Gamma, inverse-Wishart, and normal distribution on specific parameters of the model with 19000 iterations on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Whereas the PLS-SEM is established using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, PLS algorithm with 300 iterations, and 5000 subsamples on bootstrapping. The objective of this study is to get the most compatible model which represent the relationship between three latent variables in this study. Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is used on model selection between these two models. Data were obtained from 214 undergraduate students with three majors of study at the Faculty of Information Technology, Sebelas April university in Indonesia. Both models produce the same output which depict that self-directed learning readiness significantly affects the learning motivation of the students, while there is not a significant effect of e-learning readiness on learning motivation. With the lower BIC value, which is a negative value, PLS-SEM is more fitted for portray the influence of self-directed learning readiness, and e-learning readiness to learning motivation of students than B-SEM model.","PeriodicalId":19973,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria: A Model Selection Between Bayesian-SEM and Partial Least Squares-SEM\",\"authors\":\"Reny Rian Marliana, Maya Suhayati, Sri Bekti Handayani Ningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.18187/pjsor.v19i4.4146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this academic work a comparison between a Bayesian-Structural Equation Modelling (B-SEM) and a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on a relationship amongst self-directed learning readiness (SDLR), E-learning readiness, and learning motivation of undergraduate students throughout the outbreak of Covid-19 is studied. The B-SEM is built using prior distribution i.e., inverse-Gamma, inverse-Wishart, and normal distribution on specific parameters of the model with 19000 iterations on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Whereas the PLS-SEM is established using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, PLS algorithm with 300 iterations, and 5000 subsamples on bootstrapping. The objective of this study is to get the most compatible model which represent the relationship between three latent variables in this study. Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is used on model selection between these two models. Data were obtained from 214 undergraduate students with three majors of study at the Faculty of Information Technology, Sebelas April university in Indonesia. Both models produce the same output which depict that self-directed learning readiness significantly affects the learning motivation of the students, while there is not a significant effect of e-learning readiness on learning motivation. With the lower BIC value, which is a negative value, PLS-SEM is more fitted for portray the influence of self-directed learning readiness, and e-learning readiness to learning motivation of students than B-SEM model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v19i4.4146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v19i4.4146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本学术工作中,比较了贝叶斯结构方程模型(B-SEM)和偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)在2019冠状病毒病爆发期间本科生自主学习准备(SDLR)、电子学习准备和学习动机之间的关系。B-SEM使用先验分布,即反gamma、反wishart和正态分布对模型的特定参数进行构建,使用Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)算法进行19000次迭代。而PLS- sem则采用普通最小二乘(OLS)方法,PLS算法迭代300次,自举5000个子样本。本研究的目的是获得最相容的模型来代表本研究中三个潜在变量之间的关系。采用Schwarz的贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)对两种模型进行模型选择。数据来自印度尼西亚Sebelas April大学信息技术学院三个专业的214名本科生。两个模型的输出结果一致,即自主学习准备显著影响学生的学习动机,而网络学习准备对学习动机的影响不显著。与B-SEM模型相比,PLS-SEM模型的BIC值较低,为负值,更适合描述自主学习准备和网络学习准备对学生学习动机的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria: A Model Selection Between Bayesian-SEM and Partial Least Squares-SEM
In this academic work a comparison between a Bayesian-Structural Equation Modelling (B-SEM) and a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on a relationship amongst self-directed learning readiness (SDLR), E-learning readiness, and learning motivation of undergraduate students throughout the outbreak of Covid-19 is studied. The B-SEM is built using prior distribution i.e., inverse-Gamma, inverse-Wishart, and normal distribution on specific parameters of the model with 19000 iterations on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Whereas the PLS-SEM is established using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, PLS algorithm with 300 iterations, and 5000 subsamples on bootstrapping. The objective of this study is to get the most compatible model which represent the relationship between three latent variables in this study. Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is used on model selection between these two models. Data were obtained from 214 undergraduate students with three majors of study at the Faculty of Information Technology, Sebelas April university in Indonesia. Both models produce the same output which depict that self-directed learning readiness significantly affects the learning motivation of the students, while there is not a significant effect of e-learning readiness on learning motivation. With the lower BIC value, which is a negative value, PLS-SEM is more fitted for portray the influence of self-directed learning readiness, and e-learning readiness to learning motivation of students than B-SEM model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
26.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research. PJSOR is a peer-reviewed journal, published four times a year. PJSOR publishes refereed research articles and studies that describe the latest research and developments in the area of statistics, operation research and actuarial statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信