从飞机实时侦察观测数据分析热带气旋表面风的自动方法

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
J. Knaff, C. Slocum
{"title":"从飞机实时侦察观测数据分析热带气旋表面风的自动方法","authors":"J. Knaff, C. Slocum","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study describes an automated analysis of real-time tropical cyclone (TC) aircraft reconnaissance observations to estimate TC surface winds. The wind analysis uses an iterative, objective, data-weighted analysis approach with different smoothing constraints in the radial and azimuthal directions. Smoothing constraints penalize the data misfit when the solutions deviate from smoothed analyses and extend the aircraft information into areas not directly observed. The analysis composites observations following storm motion taken within five hours prior and three hours after analysis time and makes use of prescribed methods to move observations to a Common Flight Level (CFL; 700-hPa) for analysis and reduce reconnaissance observations to the surface. Comparing analyses to several observed and simulated wind fields shows that analyses fit the observations while extending observational information to poorly observed regions. However, resulting analyses tend toward greater symmetry as observational coverage decreases, and show sensitivity to the first guess information in unobserved radii. Analyses produce reasonable and useful estimates of operationally important characteristics of the wind field. But, due to the radial and azimuthal smoothing and the under-sampling of typical aircraft reconnaissance flights, wind maxima are underestimated, and the radii of maximum wind are slightly overestimated. Varying observational coverage using model-based synthetic aircraft observations, these analyses improve as observational coverage increases, and for a typical observational pattern (two transects through the storm) the root-mean-square error deviation is < 10 kt (< 5 m s−1).","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated Method to Analyze Tropical Cyclone Surface Winds from Real-time Aircraft Reconnaissance Observations\",\"authors\":\"J. Knaff, C. Slocum\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis study describes an automated analysis of real-time tropical cyclone (TC) aircraft reconnaissance observations to estimate TC surface winds. The wind analysis uses an iterative, objective, data-weighted analysis approach with different smoothing constraints in the radial and azimuthal directions. Smoothing constraints penalize the data misfit when the solutions deviate from smoothed analyses and extend the aircraft information into areas not directly observed. The analysis composites observations following storm motion taken within five hours prior and three hours after analysis time and makes use of prescribed methods to move observations to a Common Flight Level (CFL; 700-hPa) for analysis and reduce reconnaissance observations to the surface. Comparing analyses to several observed and simulated wind fields shows that analyses fit the observations while extending observational information to poorly observed regions. However, resulting analyses tend toward greater symmetry as observational coverage decreases, and show sensitivity to the first guess information in unobserved radii. Analyses produce reasonable and useful estimates of operationally important characteristics of the wind field. But, due to the radial and azimuthal smoothing and the under-sampling of typical aircraft reconnaissance flights, wind maxima are underestimated, and the radii of maximum wind are slightly overestimated. Varying observational coverage using model-based synthetic aircraft observations, these analyses improve as observational coverage increases, and for a typical observational pattern (two transects through the storm) the root-mean-square error deviation is < 10 kt (< 5 m s−1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究描述了对实时热带气旋(TC)飞机侦察观测资料的自动分析,以估计TC地面风。风分析采用迭代、客观、数据加权的分析方法,在径向和方位角方向上具有不同的平滑约束。当解决方案偏离平滑分析并将飞机信息扩展到未直接观察到的区域时,平滑约束会惩罚数据不拟合。该分析综合了分析时间前5小时和分析时间后3小时内风暴运动后的观测资料,并利用规定的方法将观测资料移至共同飞行高度(CFL;700 hpa)进行分析,减少对地面的侦察观测。对几个观测和模拟风场的分析比较表明,分析结果与观测结果吻合,同时将观测信息扩展到观测不足的地区。然而,随着观测范围的减小,结果分析倾向于更大的对称性,并显示出对未观测半径内的第一次猜测信息的敏感性。分析可以对风场的重要操作特性作出合理而有用的估计。但是,由于典型飞机侦察飞行的径向和方面角平滑以及采样不足,极大风值被低估,最大风半径被略微高估。利用基于模型的合成飞机观测改变观测覆盖范围,这些分析随着观测覆盖范围的增加而改善,对于典型的观测模式(穿过风暴的两个断面),均方根误差偏差< 10 kt (< 5 m s - 1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Automated Method to Analyze Tropical Cyclone Surface Winds from Real-time Aircraft Reconnaissance Observations
This study describes an automated analysis of real-time tropical cyclone (TC) aircraft reconnaissance observations to estimate TC surface winds. The wind analysis uses an iterative, objective, data-weighted analysis approach with different smoothing constraints in the radial and azimuthal directions. Smoothing constraints penalize the data misfit when the solutions deviate from smoothed analyses and extend the aircraft information into areas not directly observed. The analysis composites observations following storm motion taken within five hours prior and three hours after analysis time and makes use of prescribed methods to move observations to a Common Flight Level (CFL; 700-hPa) for analysis and reduce reconnaissance observations to the surface. Comparing analyses to several observed and simulated wind fields shows that analyses fit the observations while extending observational information to poorly observed regions. However, resulting analyses tend toward greater symmetry as observational coverage decreases, and show sensitivity to the first guess information in unobserved radii. Analyses produce reasonable and useful estimates of operationally important characteristics of the wind field. But, due to the radial and azimuthal smoothing and the under-sampling of typical aircraft reconnaissance flights, wind maxima are underestimated, and the radii of maximum wind are slightly overestimated. Varying observational coverage using model-based synthetic aircraft observations, these analyses improve as observational coverage increases, and for a typical observational pattern (two transects through the storm) the root-mean-square error deviation is < 10 kt (< 5 m s−1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信