评估电子书使用情况的图书馆指标的范围和局限性:计数器 R5 和链接解析器

IF 4.1 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mercedes Echeverria, Yacelli Bustamante
{"title":"评估电子书使用情况的图书馆指标的范围和局限性:计数器 R5 和链接解析器","authors":"Mercedes Echeverria, Yacelli Bustamante","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Data is at the heart of electronic resource management in academic libraries. Assessing the usage data of electronic resources has become a prevalent approach to demonstrate the value of digital collections, justify library expenditures, and gain insights into how users interact with library materials. This study analyses the usage statistics of electronic books (ebooks) generated locally by the OpenURL link resolver in an academic library, and statistics collected by platform vendors based on Release 5 of the Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resource (COUNTER R5). Three content provider platforms (Cambridge Core, EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect) were analysed as data sources. The COUNTER and link resolver statistics were examined to determine the degree of association between these two metrics. The Spearman correlation coefficient was moderate (rs > 0.561 and <0.678) and statistically significant (p <0.01). This suggests that these metrics capture different aspects of the usage of ebooks in different contexts. Other factors, such as the types of access to electronic resources and the units of content delivered, were also examined. The study concludes with a discussion regarding the scope and limitations of link resolver and COUNTER R5 as library metrics for measuring the usage of ebooks.\n \n \n https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00279\n","PeriodicalId":34021,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Science Studies","volume":"46 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scope and limitations of library metrics for the assessment of ebook usage: COUNTER R5 and link resolver\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes Echeverria, Yacelli Bustamante\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/qss_a_00279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Data is at the heart of electronic resource management in academic libraries. Assessing the usage data of electronic resources has become a prevalent approach to demonstrate the value of digital collections, justify library expenditures, and gain insights into how users interact with library materials. This study analyses the usage statistics of electronic books (ebooks) generated locally by the OpenURL link resolver in an academic library, and statistics collected by platform vendors based on Release 5 of the Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resource (COUNTER R5). Three content provider platforms (Cambridge Core, EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect) were analysed as data sources. The COUNTER and link resolver statistics were examined to determine the degree of association between these two metrics. The Spearman correlation coefficient was moderate (rs > 0.561 and <0.678) and statistically significant (p <0.01). This suggests that these metrics capture different aspects of the usage of ebooks in different contexts. Other factors, such as the types of access to electronic resources and the units of content delivered, were also examined. The study concludes with a discussion regarding the scope and limitations of link resolver and COUNTER R5 as library metrics for measuring the usage of ebooks.\\n \\n \\n https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00279\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Science Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Science Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据是高校图书馆电子资源管理的核心。评估电子资源的使用数据已成为展示数字馆藏价值、证明图书馆支出合理性和深入了解用户如何与图书馆资料交互的普遍方法。本研究分析了某高校图书馆通过OpenURL链接解析器本地生成的电子书的使用统计数据,以及平台供应商基于第5版《网络电子资源在线使用统计》(COUNTER R5)收集的统计数据。三个内容提供商平台(Cambridge Core, EBSCOhost和ScienceDirect)作为数据源进行分析。检查COUNTER和链接解析器统计信息,以确定这两个指标之间的关联程度。Spearman相关系数为中等(rs > 0.561和<0.678),有统计学意义(p <0.01)。这表明,这些指标反映了电子书在不同环境下使用情况的不同方面。还审查了其他因素,例如取得电子资源的类型和所提供内容的单位。该研究最后讨论了链接解析器和COUNTER R5作为衡量电子书使用情况的图书馆指标的范围和局限性。https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00279
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scope and limitations of library metrics for the assessment of ebook usage: COUNTER R5 and link resolver
Data is at the heart of electronic resource management in academic libraries. Assessing the usage data of electronic resources has become a prevalent approach to demonstrate the value of digital collections, justify library expenditures, and gain insights into how users interact with library materials. This study analyses the usage statistics of electronic books (ebooks) generated locally by the OpenURL link resolver in an academic library, and statistics collected by platform vendors based on Release 5 of the Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resource (COUNTER R5). Three content provider platforms (Cambridge Core, EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect) were analysed as data sources. The COUNTER and link resolver statistics were examined to determine the degree of association between these two metrics. The Spearman correlation coefficient was moderate (rs > 0.561 and <0.678) and statistically significant (p <0.01). This suggests that these metrics capture different aspects of the usage of ebooks in different contexts. Other factors, such as the types of access to electronic resources and the units of content delivered, were also examined. The study concludes with a discussion regarding the scope and limitations of link resolver and COUNTER R5 as library metrics for measuring the usage of ebooks. https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00279
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Science Studies
Quantitative Science Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信