农村黑色素瘤患者手术更少,黑色素瘤死亡率更高

Alexandra E. Hernandez, Kelley N. Benck, Carlos T. Huerta, I. Ogobuiro, Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Mecker G. Möller
{"title":"农村黑色素瘤患者手术更少,黑色素瘤死亡率更高","authors":"Alexandra E. Hernandez, Kelley N. Benck, Carlos T. Huerta, I. Ogobuiro, Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Mecker G. Möller","doi":"10.1177/00031348231216485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Melanoma causes most skin cancer–related deaths, and disparities in mortality persist. Rural communities, compared to urban, face higher levels of poverty and more barriers to care, leading to higher stage at presentation and shorter survival in melanoma. To further evaluate these disparities, we sought to assess the association between rurality and melanoma cause-specific mortality and receipt of recommended surgery in a national cohort. Patients with primary non-ocular, cutaneous melanoma from the SEER database, 2000-2017, were included. Outcomes included melanoma-specific survival and receipt of recommended surgery. Rurality was based on Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Variables included age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, and stage. Multivariate regression models assessed the effect of rurality on survival and receipt of recommended surgery. 103,606 patients diagnosed with non-ocular cutaneous primary melanoma met criteria during this period. 93.3% ( n = 96620) were in urban areas and 6.7% ( n = 6986) were in rural areas. On multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and stage patients living in a rural area were less likely to receive recommended surgery (aOR .52, 95% CI: .29-.90, P = .02) and had increased hazard of melanoma-specific mortality (aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.40, P = .03) even after additionally controlling for surgery receipt. Using a large national cohort, our study found that rural patients were less likely to receive recommended surgery and had shorter melanoma cause-specific survival. Our findings highlight the importance of access to cancer care in rural areas and how this ultimately effects survival for these patients.","PeriodicalId":218262,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon™","volume":"45 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Melanoma Patients Have Less Surgery and Higher Melanoma-Specific Mortality\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra E. Hernandez, Kelley N. Benck, Carlos T. Huerta, I. Ogobuiro, Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Mecker G. Möller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348231216485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Melanoma causes most skin cancer–related deaths, and disparities in mortality persist. Rural communities, compared to urban, face higher levels of poverty and more barriers to care, leading to higher stage at presentation and shorter survival in melanoma. To further evaluate these disparities, we sought to assess the association between rurality and melanoma cause-specific mortality and receipt of recommended surgery in a national cohort. Patients with primary non-ocular, cutaneous melanoma from the SEER database, 2000-2017, were included. Outcomes included melanoma-specific survival and receipt of recommended surgery. Rurality was based on Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Variables included age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, and stage. Multivariate regression models assessed the effect of rurality on survival and receipt of recommended surgery. 103,606 patients diagnosed with non-ocular cutaneous primary melanoma met criteria during this period. 93.3% ( n = 96620) were in urban areas and 6.7% ( n = 6986) were in rural areas. On multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and stage patients living in a rural area were less likely to receive recommended surgery (aOR .52, 95% CI: .29-.90, P = .02) and had increased hazard of melanoma-specific mortality (aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.40, P = .03) even after additionally controlling for surgery receipt. Using a large national cohort, our study found that rural patients were less likely to receive recommended surgery and had shorter melanoma cause-specific survival. Our findings highlight the importance of access to cancer care in rural areas and how this ultimately effects survival for these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Surgeon™\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Surgeon™\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231216485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon™","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231216485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑色素瘤导致大多数皮肤癌相关死亡,死亡率的差异仍然存在。与城市相比,农村社区面临着更高的贫困水平和更多的护理障碍,导致黑色素瘤的发病阶段更长,生存期更短。为了进一步评估这些差异,我们试图在一个国家队列中评估乡村性和黑色素瘤病因特异性死亡率和接受推荐手术之间的关系。纳入了2000-2017年SEER数据库中原发性非眼部皮肤黑色素瘤患者。结果包括黑色素瘤特异性生存和接受推荐手术。农村是基于农村-城市连续代码。变量包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、收入和阶段。多变量回归模型评估乡村性对生存和接受推荐手术的影响。在此期间,103,606名被诊断为非眼部皮肤原发性黑色素瘤的患者符合标准。93.3% (n = 96620)在城市地区,6.7% (n = 6986)在农村地区。在控制年龄、性别、种族、民族和分期的多因素回归分析中,生活在农村地区的患者接受推荐手术的可能性较小(aOR为0.52,95% CI为0.29 -)。90, P = 0.02),即使在额外控制手术接受情况后,黑素瘤特异性死亡率的风险也增加(aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.40, P = 0.03)。通过一个大型的国家队列,我们的研究发现农村患者接受推荐手术的可能性更小,黑色素瘤病因特异性生存期更短。我们的研究结果强调了在农村地区获得癌症治疗的重要性,以及这最终如何影响这些患者的生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural Melanoma Patients Have Less Surgery and Higher Melanoma-Specific Mortality
Melanoma causes most skin cancer–related deaths, and disparities in mortality persist. Rural communities, compared to urban, face higher levels of poverty and more barriers to care, leading to higher stage at presentation and shorter survival in melanoma. To further evaluate these disparities, we sought to assess the association between rurality and melanoma cause-specific mortality and receipt of recommended surgery in a national cohort. Patients with primary non-ocular, cutaneous melanoma from the SEER database, 2000-2017, were included. Outcomes included melanoma-specific survival and receipt of recommended surgery. Rurality was based on Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Variables included age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, and stage. Multivariate regression models assessed the effect of rurality on survival and receipt of recommended surgery. 103,606 patients diagnosed with non-ocular cutaneous primary melanoma met criteria during this period. 93.3% ( n = 96620) were in urban areas and 6.7% ( n = 6986) were in rural areas. On multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and stage patients living in a rural area were less likely to receive recommended surgery (aOR .52, 95% CI: .29-.90, P = .02) and had increased hazard of melanoma-specific mortality (aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.40, P = .03) even after additionally controlling for surgery receipt. Using a large national cohort, our study found that rural patients were less likely to receive recommended surgery and had shorter melanoma cause-specific survival. Our findings highlight the importance of access to cancer care in rural areas and how this ultimately effects survival for these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信