人工智能与农业和应用经济学学习和评估的未来

Hannah E. Shear, Logan L. Britton, K. Aleks Schaefer, Bhawna Thapa, Jason S. Bergtold
{"title":"人工智能与农业和应用经济学学习和评估的未来","authors":"Hannah E. Shear,&nbsp;Logan L. Britton,&nbsp;K. Aleks Schaefer,&nbsp;Bhawna Thapa,&nbsp;Jason S. Bergtold","doi":"10.1002/jaa2.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using a repository of historical student responses to an actual course-assigned essay prompt and a series of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses to the same prompt, we conduct a single-blind, randomized experiment to evaluate the performance of AI in agricultural and applied economics education. Further, we assess instructors' ability to detect the use of AI. We find that AI-generated responses to the essay received statistically significantly higher scores than those of the average student. Instructors who had previous exposure to dialog-based AI were 13 times more likely to accurately detect AI-generated essays than instructors without previous exposure to the technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","volume":"2 4","pages":"838-850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaa2.98","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and the future of learning and assessment in agricultural and applied economics\",\"authors\":\"Hannah E. Shear,&nbsp;Logan L. Britton,&nbsp;K. Aleks Schaefer,&nbsp;Bhawna Thapa,&nbsp;Jason S. Bergtold\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jaa2.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using a repository of historical student responses to an actual course-assigned essay prompt and a series of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses to the same prompt, we conduct a single-blind, randomized experiment to evaluate the performance of AI in agricultural and applied economics education. Further, we assess instructors' ability to detect the use of AI. We find that AI-generated responses to the essay received statistically significantly higher scores than those of the average student. Instructors who had previous exposure to dialog-based AI were 13 times more likely to accurately detect AI-generated essays than instructors without previous exposure to the technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"838-850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaa2.98\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaa2.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaa2.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用历史学生对实际课程分配的论文提示的回答和一系列人工智能(AI)生成的对同一提示的回答,我们进行了单盲随机实验,以评估人工智能在农业和应用经济学教育中的表现。此外,我们评估教师检测人工智能使用的能力。我们发现,人工智能生成的论文回答在统计上明显高于普通学生的得分。以前接触过基于对话的人工智能的教师比以前没有接触过该技术的教师准确检测人工智能生成的论文的可能性高13倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence and the future of learning and assessment in agricultural and applied economics

Artificial intelligence and the future of learning and assessment in agricultural and applied economics

Using a repository of historical student responses to an actual course-assigned essay prompt and a series of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses to the same prompt, we conduct a single-blind, randomized experiment to evaluate the performance of AI in agricultural and applied economics education. Further, we assess instructors' ability to detect the use of AI. We find that AI-generated responses to the essay received statistically significantly higher scores than those of the average student. Instructors who had previous exposure to dialog-based AI were 13 times more likely to accurately detect AI-generated essays than instructors without previous exposure to the technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信