{"title":"通信技术促进远程学习：出版流的文献计量分析","authors":"A. Petrushka, D. Maletych","doi":"10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.3(55).15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong><em>The article aims</em></strong><em> to identify the trends and dynamics of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies..</em></p><p><strong><em>Research methodology.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><em>The research methodology based on bibliometric analysis, comparison method, descriptive method and visualization method. By means of bibliometric analysis, diachronic, geographical and linguistic sections of the publication flow on the use and implementation of online learning technologies were made. The comparison method was used to determine the features of the publication streams presented in the Scopus and Web of Science databases.</em></p><p><strong><em>Results.</em></strong><em> A diachronic analysis of the search results using the keywords 1) «online learning» or «educational platform» and 2) «online learning school» or «educational platform school» confirmed the positive dynamics of publication flows. At the same time, the scientific content of Scopus and Web of Science demonstrates significant differences regarding the nature of the intensification of publishing activity in the context of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The geographical section of the publication flow determined the dominant countries-sources of scientific content: USA, China, Great Britain. The share of domestic content is insignificant and amounts to 0.4% and 0.5% in Scopus and Web of Science, respectively. The language slice of the publication stream showed the dominance of English, Spanish and Portuguese scientific content in both databases.</em></p><p><em>The novelty of the obtained research results lies in the application of bibliometric analysis tools to determine the dynamics and trends of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies.</em></p><p><strong><em>Practical meaning.</em></strong><em> The obtained results can serve as a methodological basis for further studies of publication flows in other areas of scientific knowledge.</em></p><p><strong><em>Key</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>words:</em></strong><em> publication flow, scientific content, bibliometric analysis, distance learning, educational platforms, database</em><em>.</em></p>","PeriodicalId":345460,"journal":{"name":"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"КОМУНІКАЦІЙНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ ДИСТАНЦІЙНОГО НАВЧАННЯ: БІБЛІОМЕТРИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПУБЛІКАЦІЙНИХ ПОТОКІВ\",\"authors\":\"A. Petrushka, D. Maletych\",\"doi\":\"10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.3(55).15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong><em>The article aims</em></strong><em> to identify the trends and dynamics of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies..</em></p><p><strong><em>Research methodology.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><em>The research methodology based on bibliometric analysis, comparison method, descriptive method and visualization method. By means of bibliometric analysis, diachronic, geographical and linguistic sections of the publication flow on the use and implementation of online learning technologies were made. The comparison method was used to determine the features of the publication streams presented in the Scopus and Web of Science databases.</em></p><p><strong><em>Results.</em></strong><em> A diachronic analysis of the search results using the keywords 1) «online learning» or «educational platform» and 2) «online learning school» or «educational platform school» confirmed the positive dynamics of publication flows. At the same time, the scientific content of Scopus and Web of Science demonstrates significant differences regarding the nature of the intensification of publishing activity in the context of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The geographical section of the publication flow determined the dominant countries-sources of scientific content: USA, China, Great Britain. The share of domestic content is insignificant and amounts to 0.4% and 0.5% in Scopus and Web of Science, respectively. The language slice of the publication stream showed the dominance of English, Spanish and Portuguese scientific content in both databases.</em></p><p><em>The novelty of the obtained research results lies in the application of bibliometric analysis tools to determine the dynamics and trends of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies.</em></p><p><strong><em>Practical meaning.</em></strong><em> The obtained results can serve as a methodological basis for further studies of publication flows in other areas of scientific knowledge.</em></p><p><strong><em>Key</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>words:</em></strong><em> publication flow, scientific content, bibliometric analysis, distance learning, educational platforms, database</em><em>.</em></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":345460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.3(55).15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.3(55).15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在确定关于在线学习技术的使用和实施的出版流的趋势和动态。研究方法主要采用文献计量分析法、比较法、描述法和可视化法。通过文献计量学分析，对在线学习技术的使用和实施的出版流程进行了历时、地理和语言部分的分析。采用比较方法确定Scopus和Web of Science数据库中发表流的特征。使用关键词1)“在线学习”或“教育平台”和2)“在线学习学校”或“教育平台学校”对搜索结果进行历时分析，证实了出版物流量的积极动态。与此同时，在新冠疫情影响下，Scopus和Web of Science的科学内容在出版活动加剧的性质上存在显著差异。出版流的地理区域决定了科学内容的主要来源国家:美国、中国和英国。国内内容所占份额不显著，在Scopus和Web of Science中分别为0.4%和0.5%。出版物流的语言部分显示，在两个数据库中，英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语的科学内容占主导地位。所获得的研究结果的新颖性在于应用文献计量学分析工具来确定与使用和实施在线学习技术有关的出版物流量的动态和趋势。现实意义。所获得的结果可以作为进一步研究其他科学知识领域的出版物流动的方法论基础。关键词:出版流程，科学内容，文献计量分析，远程教育，教育平台，数据库。
КОМУНІКАЦІЙНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ ДИСТАНЦІЙНОГО НАВЧАННЯ: БІБЛІОМЕТРИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПУБЛІКАЦІЙНИХ ПОТОКІВ
The article aims to identify the trends and dynamics of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies..
Research methodology.The research methodology based on bibliometric analysis, comparison method, descriptive method and visualization method. By means of bibliometric analysis, diachronic, geographical and linguistic sections of the publication flow on the use and implementation of online learning technologies were made. The comparison method was used to determine the features of the publication streams presented in the Scopus and Web of Science databases.
Results. A diachronic analysis of the search results using the keywords 1) «online learning» or «educational platform» and 2) «online learning school» or «educational platform school» confirmed the positive dynamics of publication flows. At the same time, the scientific content of Scopus and Web of Science demonstrates significant differences regarding the nature of the intensification of publishing activity in the context of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The geographical section of the publication flow determined the dominant countries-sources of scientific content: USA, China, Great Britain. The share of domestic content is insignificant and amounts to 0.4% and 0.5% in Scopus and Web of Science, respectively. The language slice of the publication stream showed the dominance of English, Spanish and Portuguese scientific content in both databases.
The novelty of the obtained research results lies in the application of bibliometric analysis tools to determine the dynamics and trends of the publication flow regarding the use and implementation of online learning technologies.
Practical meaning. The obtained results can serve as a methodological basis for further studies of publication flows in other areas of scientific knowledge.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
