抨击贝利撒留:普罗科皮乌斯《秘史》中的论战人物描写

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Michael Edward Stewart
{"title":"抨击贝利撒留:普罗科皮乌斯《秘史》中的论战人物描写","authors":"Michael Edward Stewart","doi":"10.1353/acl.2022.a914032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:When attacking their enemies late Roman and Byzantine intellectuals recognized that words could be effective and sometimes deadly weapons. These authors have left some memorable polemics. Of these, the most famous and widely read today is the sixth-century Anecdota or Secret History by Procopius. This article examines the role polemic plays in the Secret History and particularly Procopius’ hostile portrait of his former superior, the general Belisarius. Capitalizing upon recent advancements made in our understanding of the possible literary and political context behind the Secret History, I suggest that Procopius’ seeming turn against Belisarius in this work, which inverts the historian’s heroic characterization of Belisarius from his De bellis or On the Wars, is best seen as a calculated piece of political manoeuvring rather than as evidence of the historian’s ‘true’ animosity towards the general.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":"8 10","pages":"265 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bashing Belisarius: polemical characterizations in Procopius’ Secret History\",\"authors\":\"Michael Edward Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/acl.2022.a914032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:When attacking their enemies late Roman and Byzantine intellectuals recognized that words could be effective and sometimes deadly weapons. These authors have left some memorable polemics. Of these, the most famous and widely read today is the sixth-century Anecdota or Secret History by Procopius. This article examines the role polemic plays in the Secret History and particularly Procopius’ hostile portrait of his former superior, the general Belisarius. Capitalizing upon recent advancements made in our understanding of the possible literary and political context behind the Secret History, I suggest that Procopius’ seeming turn against Belisarius in this work, which inverts the historian’s heroic characterization of Belisarius from his De bellis or On the Wars, is best seen as a calculated piece of political manoeuvring rather than as evidence of the historian’s ‘true’ animosity towards the general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Classica\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"265 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Classica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2022.a914032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2022.a914032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在攻击敌人时,晚期罗马和拜占庭的知识分子认识到语言是有效的,有时甚至是致命的武器。这些作者留下了一些令人难忘的论战。其中,最著名、最广为阅读的是六世纪普罗科匹厄斯的《轶事》或《秘史》。本文考察了辩论在《秘史》中扮演的角色,特别是普罗科匹厄斯对他的前任上司贝利萨留将军的敌意肖像。利用我们最近对《秘史》背后可能的文学和政治背景的理解取得的进展,我认为普罗科匹厄斯在这部作品中似乎反对贝利萨留,这与历史学家在《战争论》中对贝利萨留的英雄形象截然相反,最好被视为一种经过计算的政治策略,而不是历史学家对这位将军“真正”仇恨的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bashing Belisarius: polemical characterizations in Procopius’ Secret History
ABSTRACT:When attacking their enemies late Roman and Byzantine intellectuals recognized that words could be effective and sometimes deadly weapons. These authors have left some memorable polemics. Of these, the most famous and widely read today is the sixth-century Anecdota or Secret History by Procopius. This article examines the role polemic plays in the Secret History and particularly Procopius’ hostile portrait of his former superior, the general Belisarius. Capitalizing upon recent advancements made in our understanding of the possible literary and political context behind the Secret History, I suggest that Procopius’ seeming turn against Belisarius in this work, which inverts the historian’s heroic characterization of Belisarius from his De bellis or On the Wars, is best seen as a calculated piece of political manoeuvring rather than as evidence of the historian’s ‘true’ animosity towards the general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Classica
Acta Classica CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信