Maria N. Som, Natalie T. Chao, Allison Karwoski, Luke T. Pitsenbarger, Eleanor Dunlap, Khanjan H. Nagarsheth
{"title":"改良虚弱指数有助于预测重大下肢截肢术后的死亡率和下肢活动能力的性别差异及种族差异","authors":"Maria N. Som, Natalie T. Chao, Allison Karwoski, Luke T. Pitsenbarger, Eleanor Dunlap, Khanjan H. Nagarsheth","doi":"10.1177/00031348231220570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been used to predict outcomes including ambulation and mortality after LEA. It remains unknown for which patient demographics the mFI-5 is a reliable predictor. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a first-time major LEA at our institution from 2015 to 2022. Patients were stratified into 2 risk groups based on their mFI-5 score: non-frail (mFI<3) and frail (mFI≥3) and assessed on outcomes. Our sample consisted of 687 patients of whom 134 (19.6%) were considered frail and 551 (80.4%) were considered non-frail. A higher mFI-5 is associated with decreased ambulation rates (OR: 0.565, P = .004), increased hospital readmission (OR: 1.657, P = .021), and increased mortality (OR: 2.101, P = .001) following major LEA. In African American patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .008), mortality at 1 year ( P = .001), ambulatory status ( P < .001), and prosthesis use ( P = .023). In male patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .019), death at 1 year ( P = .001), and ambulatory status ( P = .002). In Caucasian patients and female patients, frail and non-frail patients did not differ significantly on outcomes. The mFI-5 is a valuable predictor of outcomes following major LEA, specifically in males and African American patients. Moreover, surgeons should consider using frailty status to risk stratify patients and inform treatment plans.","PeriodicalId":218262,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon™","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Frailty Index Helps Predict Mortality and Ambulation Differences Between Genders and Racial Differences Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation\",\"authors\":\"Maria N. Som, Natalie T. Chao, Allison Karwoski, Luke T. Pitsenbarger, Eleanor Dunlap, Khanjan H. Nagarsheth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348231220570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been used to predict outcomes including ambulation and mortality after LEA. It remains unknown for which patient demographics the mFI-5 is a reliable predictor. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a first-time major LEA at our institution from 2015 to 2022. Patients were stratified into 2 risk groups based on their mFI-5 score: non-frail (mFI<3) and frail (mFI≥3) and assessed on outcomes. Our sample consisted of 687 patients of whom 134 (19.6%) were considered frail and 551 (80.4%) were considered non-frail. A higher mFI-5 is associated with decreased ambulation rates (OR: 0.565, P = .004), increased hospital readmission (OR: 1.657, P = .021), and increased mortality (OR: 2.101, P = .001) following major LEA. In African American patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .008), mortality at 1 year ( P = .001), ambulatory status ( P < .001), and prosthesis use ( P = .023). In male patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .019), death at 1 year ( P = .001), and ambulatory status ( P = .002). In Caucasian patients and female patients, frail and non-frail patients did not differ significantly on outcomes. The mFI-5 is a valuable predictor of outcomes following major LEA, specifically in males and African American patients. Moreover, surgeons should consider using frailty status to risk stratify patients and inform treatment plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Surgeon™\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Surgeon™\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231220570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon™","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231220570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
下肢大截肢(LEA)具有显著的发病率和死亡率。改进的衰弱指数(mFI-5)已被用于预测LEA后的结果,包括活动和死亡率。目前尚不清楚mFI-5是哪类患者的可靠预测指标。这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2015年至2022年在我院首次接受重大LEA的所有患者。根据患者的mFI-5评分将患者分为2个危险组:非虚弱(mFI<3)和虚弱(mFI≥3),并对结果进行评估。我们的样本包括687例患者,其中134例(19.6%)被认为虚弱,551例(80.4%)被认为非虚弱。较高的mFI-5与严重LEA后活动率降低(OR: 0.565, P = 0.004)、再入院率增加(OR: 1.657, P = 0.021)和死亡率增加(OR: 2.101, P = 0.001)相关。在非裔美国患者中,体弱和非体弱患者在90天再入院(P = 0.008)、1年死亡率(P = 0.001)、活动状态(P < 0.001)和假体使用(P = 0.023)方面存在差异。在男性患者中,体弱和非体弱患者在90天再入院(P = 0.019)、1年死亡(P = 0.001)和活动状态(P = 0.002)方面存在差异。在高加索患者和女性患者中,体弱和非体弱患者的结果没有显着差异。mFI-5是主要LEA后预后的重要预测指标,特别是在男性和非裔美国患者中。此外,外科医生应考虑使用虚弱状态对患者进行风险分层,并告知治疗计划。
Modified Frailty Index Helps Predict Mortality and Ambulation Differences Between Genders and Racial Differences Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been used to predict outcomes including ambulation and mortality after LEA. It remains unknown for which patient demographics the mFI-5 is a reliable predictor. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a first-time major LEA at our institution from 2015 to 2022. Patients were stratified into 2 risk groups based on their mFI-5 score: non-frail (mFI<3) and frail (mFI≥3) and assessed on outcomes. Our sample consisted of 687 patients of whom 134 (19.6%) were considered frail and 551 (80.4%) were considered non-frail. A higher mFI-5 is associated with decreased ambulation rates (OR: 0.565, P = .004), increased hospital readmission (OR: 1.657, P = .021), and increased mortality (OR: 2.101, P = .001) following major LEA. In African American patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .008), mortality at 1 year ( P = .001), ambulatory status ( P < .001), and prosthesis use ( P = .023). In male patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days ( P = .019), death at 1 year ( P = .001), and ambulatory status ( P = .002). In Caucasian patients and female patients, frail and non-frail patients did not differ significantly on outcomes. The mFI-5 is a valuable predictor of outcomes following major LEA, specifically in males and African American patients. Moreover, surgeons should consider using frailty status to risk stratify patients and inform treatment plans.