不移除有形物品的功能性交流训练

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
David W. Cosottile, Emily Exline, Jessica S. Akers, Stephanie Gerow, Remington Swensson
{"title":"不移除有形物品的功能性交流训练","authors":"David W. Cosottile, Emily Exline, Jessica S. Akers, Stephanie Gerow, Remington Swensson","doi":"10.1177/15346501231221284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in challenging behavior that can result in missing out on potential reinforcers. A common intervention for challenging behavior is functional communication training (FCT). In FCT, the clinician reinforces an appropriate communicative response using the same reinforcer maintaining the challenging behavior. In some cases, the challenging behavior is too severe for traditional FCT procedures to efficiently teach a new response. In this case study, we treated a 4-year-old boy with ASD referred to as Mostafa using a modified version of FCT. We did not include a typical component of traditional FCT procedures – the removal of the putative reinforcer prior to the trial. Instead, we provided components of toys and games contingent on the appropriate communication response. None of the components had to be removed to continue conducting learning trials. Mostafa’s communication increased and challenging behavior decreased as a result of this modification. This modification may be useful for other cases in which the removal of a tangible item interferes with learning a communication response.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Communication Training Without the Removal of a Tangible Item\",\"authors\":\"David W. Cosottile, Emily Exline, Jessica S. Akers, Stephanie Gerow, Remington Swensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15346501231221284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in challenging behavior that can result in missing out on potential reinforcers. A common intervention for challenging behavior is functional communication training (FCT). In FCT, the clinician reinforces an appropriate communicative response using the same reinforcer maintaining the challenging behavior. In some cases, the challenging behavior is too severe for traditional FCT procedures to efficiently teach a new response. In this case study, we treated a 4-year-old boy with ASD referred to as Mostafa using a modified version of FCT. We did not include a typical component of traditional FCT procedures – the removal of the putative reinforcer prior to the trial. Instead, we provided components of toys and games contingent on the appropriate communication response. None of the components had to be removed to continue conducting learning trials. Mostafa’s communication increased and challenging behavior decreased as a result of this modification. This modification may be useful for other cases in which the removal of a tangible item interferes with learning a communication response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501231221284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501231221284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童从事具有挑战性的行为,可能导致错过潜在的强化因素。对挑战性行为的常见干预是功能性沟通训练(FCT)。在FCT中,临床医生使用相同的强化者维持挑战性行为来强化适当的交际反应。在某些情况下,具有挑战性的行为对于传统的FCT程序来说过于严重,无法有效地教授新的反应。在这个案例研究中,我们使用改良版的FCT治疗了一个4岁的ASD男孩,他被称为Mostafa。我们没有包括传统FCT程序的一个典型组成部分-在试验之前去除假定的强化物。相反,我们提供了玩具和游戏组件,这些组件取决于适当的沟通反应。不需要移除任何组件来继续进行学习试验。由于这一修改,穆斯塔法的沟通增加了,挑战行为减少了。这种修改可能对移除有形物品干扰学习交流反应的其他情况有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Communication Training Without the Removal of a Tangible Item
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in challenging behavior that can result in missing out on potential reinforcers. A common intervention for challenging behavior is functional communication training (FCT). In FCT, the clinician reinforces an appropriate communicative response using the same reinforcer maintaining the challenging behavior. In some cases, the challenging behavior is too severe for traditional FCT procedures to efficiently teach a new response. In this case study, we treated a 4-year-old boy with ASD referred to as Mostafa using a modified version of FCT. We did not include a typical component of traditional FCT procedures – the removal of the putative reinforcer prior to the trial. Instead, we provided components of toys and games contingent on the appropriate communication response. None of the components had to be removed to continue conducting learning trials. Mostafa’s communication increased and challenging behavior decreased as a result of this modification. This modification may be useful for other cases in which the removal of a tangible item interferes with learning a communication response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信