FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 矫正近视和近视散光的 OBL 风险因素比较

Zichen Wang, Mingrui Li, Haixia Ji, Hui Chen, Aimin Sang, Xinliang Cheng, Jun Li, Ying Yu
{"title":"FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 矫正近视和近视散光的 OBL 风险因素比较","authors":"Zichen Wang, Mingrui Li, Haixia Ji, Hui Chen, Aimin Sang, Xinliang Cheng, Jun Li, Ying Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>To find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: \"OBL\" groups and \"no OBL\" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into \"hard OBL\" and \"soft OBL\" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (β = 0.126, <i>P</i> = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (<i>P</i> = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (β = 0.195, <i>P</i> = 0.024; β = 0.281, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12748,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"233 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism\",\"authors\":\"Zichen Wang, Mingrui Li, Haixia Ji, Hui Chen, Aimin Sang, Xinliang Cheng, Jun Li, Ying Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>To find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: \\\"OBL\\\" groups and \\\"no OBL\\\" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into \\\"hard OBL\\\" and \\\"soft OBL\\\" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>In the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (β = 0.126, <i>P</i> = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (<i>P</i> = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (β = 0.195, <i>P</i> = 0.024; β = 0.281, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为了了解飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和小切口皮瓣摘除术(SMILE)后近视和近视散光患者不透明气泡层(OBL)的发生率和风险因素。每种手术都分为两组,即 "OBL "组和 "无OBL "组:"OBL "组和 "无 OBL "组。在 FS-LASIK 组中,出现 OBL 的眼睛被分为 "硬性 OBL "组和 "软性 OBL "组。在观看手术过程录像并截图后,对 OBL 的发生率和大小进行了分析。结果 在 FS-LASIK 手术中,OBL 的发生率为 63.2%(347 眼)。较厚的中央角膜厚度(CCT)是影响 OBL 面积的唯一独立风险因素(β = 0.126,P = 0.019)。SMILE组中有130只眼睛的OBL较硬,这些眼睛的角膜瓣厚度比OBL较软的眼睛薄(P = 0.027)。在SMILE组中,26.6%(140只眼)出现了OBL。较高的平坦角膜度数(K)和较厚的残余基质厚度(RST)是影响 OBL 面积的风险因素(β = 0.195,P = 0.024;β = 0.281,P = 0.001)。两种手术的 OBL 影响因素存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism

Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism

Background

To find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: "OBL" groups and "no OBL" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into "hard OBL" and "soft OBL" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.

Results

In the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (β = 0.126, P = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (P = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (β = 0.195, P = 0.024; β = 0.281, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信