姿态检测与解释

IF 9.3 2区 计算机科学
Rudra Ranajee Saha, Raymond T. Ng, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan
{"title":"姿态检测与解释","authors":"Rudra Ranajee Saha, Raymond T. Ng, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan","doi":"10.1162/coli_a_00501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identification of stance has recently gained a lot of attention with the extreme growth of fake news and filter bubbles. Over the last decade, many feature-based and deep-learning approaches have been proposed to solve Stance Detection. However, almost none of the existing works focus on providing a meaningful explanation for their prediction. In this work, we study Stance Detection with an emphasis on generating explanations for the predicted stance by capturing the pivotal argumentative structure embedded in a document. We propose to build a Stance Tree which utilizes Rhetorical Parsing to construct an evidence tree and to use Dempster Shafer Theory to aggregate the evidence. Human studies show that our unsupervised technique of generating stance explanations outperforms the SOTA extractive summarization method in terms of informativeness, non-redundancy, coverage, and overall quality. Furthermore, experiments show that our explanation-based stance prediction excels or matches the performance of the SOTA model on various benchmark datasets.","PeriodicalId":49089,"journal":{"name":"Computational Linguistics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stance Detection with Explanations\",\"authors\":\"Rudra Ranajee Saha, Raymond T. Ng, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/coli_a_00501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identification of stance has recently gained a lot of attention with the extreme growth of fake news and filter bubbles. Over the last decade, many feature-based and deep-learning approaches have been proposed to solve Stance Detection. However, almost none of the existing works focus on providing a meaningful explanation for their prediction. In this work, we study Stance Detection with an emphasis on generating explanations for the predicted stance by capturing the pivotal argumentative structure embedded in a document. We propose to build a Stance Tree which utilizes Rhetorical Parsing to construct an evidence tree and to use Dempster Shafer Theory to aggregate the evidence. Human studies show that our unsupervised technique of generating stance explanations outperforms the SOTA extractive summarization method in terms of informativeness, non-redundancy, coverage, and overall quality. Furthermore, experiments show that our explanation-based stance prediction excels or matches the performance of the SOTA model on various benchmark datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00501\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,随着假新闻和过滤泡沫的急剧增长,立场识别受到了广泛关注。在过去十年中,人们提出了许多基于特征和深度学习的方法来解决立场检测问题。然而,几乎所有现有作品都没有专注于为其预测提供有意义的解释。在这项工作中,我们研究了立场检测,重点是通过捕捉文档中嵌入的关键论证结构,为预测的立场生成解释。我们建议建立立场树,利用修辞解析法来构建证据树,并使用 Dempster Shafer 理论来汇总证据。人工研究表明,我们的无监督立场解释生成技术在信息量、非冗余性、覆盖率和整体质量方面都优于 SOTA 提取摘要方法。此外,实验表明,我们基于解释的立场预测在各种基准数据集上的表现都优于或与 SOTA 模型不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stance Detection with Explanations
Identification of stance has recently gained a lot of attention with the extreme growth of fake news and filter bubbles. Over the last decade, many feature-based and deep-learning approaches have been proposed to solve Stance Detection. However, almost none of the existing works focus on providing a meaningful explanation for their prediction. In this work, we study Stance Detection with an emphasis on generating explanations for the predicted stance by capturing the pivotal argumentative structure embedded in a document. We propose to build a Stance Tree which utilizes Rhetorical Parsing to construct an evidence tree and to use Dempster Shafer Theory to aggregate the evidence. Human studies show that our unsupervised technique of generating stance explanations outperforms the SOTA extractive summarization method in terms of informativeness, non-redundancy, coverage, and overall quality. Furthermore, experiments show that our explanation-based stance prediction excels or matches the performance of the SOTA model on various benchmark datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Linguistics
Computational Linguistics Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Computational Linguistics is the longest-running publication devoted exclusively to the computational and mathematical properties of language and the design and analysis of natural language processing systems. This highly regarded quarterly offers university and industry linguists, computational linguists, artificial intelligence and machine learning investigators, cognitive scientists, speech specialists, and philosophers the latest information about the computational aspects of all the facets of research on language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信