不同制度化背景下的个人职业认知:自由、协调、等级和地中海市场经济中职业生涯参与者的比较研究

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Maike Andresen, Eleni Apospori, Hugh Gunz, Richard Cotton, Douglas T. Hall, Yan Shen, Janine Bosak, Michael Dickmann, Emma Parry
{"title":"不同制度化背景下的个人职业认知:自由、协调、等级和地中海市场经济中职业生涯参与者的比较研究","authors":"Maike Andresen,&nbsp;Eleni Apospori,&nbsp;Hugh Gunz,&nbsp;Richard Cotton,&nbsp;Douglas T. Hall,&nbsp;Yan Shen,&nbsp;Janine Bosak,&nbsp;Michael Dickmann,&nbsp;Emma Parry","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leveraging Weiner's attribution theory of intrapersonal motivation at the micro level and varieties of capitalism theory at the macro level, we conduct a multi-country and cross-level study examining whether individuals' career goals (i.e., perceived importance of learning and development), behaviors (i.e., proactive career behaviors), and outcomes (i.e., perceived employability) as well as the relationships between these variables, differ between different market economies. We challenge extant literature that focuses on the agentic role of individuals and understates the role of context (i.e., market economy influence) in an individual's career development. Using multilevel structural equation modeling, we draw on a survey of 15,201 individuals between 2014 and 2016 from 22 countries representing four different varieties of capitalism. The results showed that workers in hierarchical (HME) and Mediterranean (MME) market economies systematically differed from individuals in coordinated (CME) and liberal (LME) market economies in proactive career behaviors and perceived employability. Moreover, while the positive relationship between perceived importance of learning and development and proactive career behaviors was stronger in CMEs and LMEs compared to HMEs and MMEs, the positive association between proactive career behaviors and perceived employability was weaker. Our study bridges the micro-macro gap in career studies, adding new insights into the ongoing conversation of contextual influence in individuals' career development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"34 4","pages":"991-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12541","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individuals' career perceptions in different institutionalized contexts: A comparative study of career actors in liberal, coordinated, hierarchical and mediterranean market economies\",\"authors\":\"Maike Andresen,&nbsp;Eleni Apospori,&nbsp;Hugh Gunz,&nbsp;Richard Cotton,&nbsp;Douglas T. Hall,&nbsp;Yan Shen,&nbsp;Janine Bosak,&nbsp;Michael Dickmann,&nbsp;Emma Parry\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1748-8583.12541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Leveraging Weiner's attribution theory of intrapersonal motivation at the micro level and varieties of capitalism theory at the macro level, we conduct a multi-country and cross-level study examining whether individuals' career goals (i.e., perceived importance of learning and development), behaviors (i.e., proactive career behaviors), and outcomes (i.e., perceived employability) as well as the relationships between these variables, differ between different market economies. We challenge extant literature that focuses on the agentic role of individuals and understates the role of context (i.e., market economy influence) in an individual's career development. Using multilevel structural equation modeling, we draw on a survey of 15,201 individuals between 2014 and 2016 from 22 countries representing four different varieties of capitalism. The results showed that workers in hierarchical (HME) and Mediterranean (MME) market economies systematically differed from individuals in coordinated (CME) and liberal (LME) market economies in proactive career behaviors and perceived employability. Moreover, while the positive relationship between perceived importance of learning and development and proactive career behaviors was stronger in CMEs and LMEs compared to HMEs and MMEs, the positive association between proactive career behaviors and perceived employability was weaker. Our study bridges the micro-macro gap in career studies, adding new insights into the ongoing conversation of contextual influence in individuals' career development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"991-1021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12541\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用韦纳在微观层面上的个人内驱力归因理论和在宏观层面上的资本主义品种理论,我们开展了一项多国跨层面研究,探讨不同市场经济体之间个人的职业目标(即学习和发展的重要性认知)、行为(即积极主动的职业行为)和结果(即就业能力认知)以及这些变量之间的关系是否存在差异。我们对现有的文献提出了质疑,这些文献侧重于个人的代理作用,而低估了环境(即市场经济的影响)在个人职业发展中的作用。我们利用多层次结构方程模型,在2014年至2016年期间对代表四种不同资本主义的22个国家的15201名个人进行了调查。结果显示,等级制(HME)和地中海(MME)市场经济国家的劳动者与协调制(CME)和自由制(LME)市场经济国家的劳动者在积极主动的职业行为和感知就业能力方面存在系统性差异。此外,虽然在协调型市场经济国家和自由型市场经济国家,学习与发展的重要性认知与积极主动的职业行为之间的正相关关系比在高收入市场经济国家和中等收入市场经济国家更强,但积极主动的职业行为与就业能力认知之间的正相关关系较弱。我们的研究弥补了职业生涯研究中微观与宏观之间的差距,为正在进行的关于个人职业生涯发展中环境影响的对话增添了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Individuals' career perceptions in different institutionalized contexts: A comparative study of career actors in liberal, coordinated, hierarchical and mediterranean market economies

Individuals' career perceptions in different institutionalized contexts: A comparative study of career actors in liberal, coordinated, hierarchical and mediterranean market economies

Leveraging Weiner's attribution theory of intrapersonal motivation at the micro level and varieties of capitalism theory at the macro level, we conduct a multi-country and cross-level study examining whether individuals' career goals (i.e., perceived importance of learning and development), behaviors (i.e., proactive career behaviors), and outcomes (i.e., perceived employability) as well as the relationships between these variables, differ between different market economies. We challenge extant literature that focuses on the agentic role of individuals and understates the role of context (i.e., market economy influence) in an individual's career development. Using multilevel structural equation modeling, we draw on a survey of 15,201 individuals between 2014 and 2016 from 22 countries representing four different varieties of capitalism. The results showed that workers in hierarchical (HME) and Mediterranean (MME) market economies systematically differed from individuals in coordinated (CME) and liberal (LME) market economies in proactive career behaviors and perceived employability. Moreover, while the positive relationship between perceived importance of learning and development and proactive career behaviors was stronger in CMEs and LMEs compared to HMEs and MMEs, the positive association between proactive career behaviors and perceived employability was weaker. Our study bridges the micro-macro gap in career studies, adding new insights into the ongoing conversation of contextual influence in individuals' career development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信