论模型检查知识与时间的复杂性

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Laura Bozzelli, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano
{"title":"论模型检查知识与时间的复杂性","authors":"Laura Bozzelli, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano","doi":"10.1145/3637212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We establish the precise complexity of the model-checking problem for the main logics of knowledge and time. While this problem was known to be non-elementary for agents with perfect recall, with a number of exponentials that increases with the alternation of knowledge operators, the precise complexity of the problem when the maximum alternation is fixed has been an open problem for twenty years. We close it by establishing improved upper bounds for CTL<sup>*</sup> with knowledge, and providing matching lower bounds that also apply for epistemic extensions of <sans-serif>LTL</sans-serif> and <sans-serif>CTL</sans-serif>. We also study the model-checking problem for these logics on systems satisfying the “no learning” property, introduced by Halpern and Vardi in their taxonomy of logics of knowledge and time, and we settle the complexity in almost all cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On The Complexity of Model Checking Knowledge and Time\",\"authors\":\"Laura Bozzelli, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3637212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We establish the precise complexity of the model-checking problem for the main logics of knowledge and time. While this problem was known to be non-elementary for agents with perfect recall, with a number of exponentials that increases with the alternation of knowledge operators, the precise complexity of the problem when the maximum alternation is fixed has been an open problem for twenty years. We close it by establishing improved upper bounds for CTL<sup>*</sup> with knowledge, and providing matching lower bounds that also apply for epistemic extensions of <sans-serif>LTL</sans-serif> and <sans-serif>CTL</sans-serif>. We also study the model-checking problem for these logics on systems satisfying the “no learning” property, introduced by Halpern and Vardi in their taxonomy of logics of knowledge and time, and we settle the complexity in almost all cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3637212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3637212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们为知识和时间的主要逻辑建立了模型检查问题的精确复杂性。众所周知,对于具有完全回忆能力的代理,这个问题是非基本的,其指数数随知识算子的交替而增加,但当最大交替固定时,这个问题的精确复杂度一直是一个悬而未决的问题,已有二十年之久。我们通过建立有知识的 CTL* 的改进上界,并提供同样适用于 LTL 和 CTL 的认识论扩展的匹配下界,来解决这个问题。我们还研究了这些逻辑在满足 "无学习 "属性的系统上的模型检查问题,这个问题是哈尔彭和瓦尔迪在他们的知识和时间逻辑分类学中提出的,我们解决了几乎所有情况下的复杂性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On The Complexity of Model Checking Knowledge and Time

We establish the precise complexity of the model-checking problem for the main logics of knowledge and time. While this problem was known to be non-elementary for agents with perfect recall, with a number of exponentials that increases with the alternation of knowledge operators, the precise complexity of the problem when the maximum alternation is fixed has been an open problem for twenty years. We close it by establishing improved upper bounds for CTL* with knowledge, and providing matching lower bounds that also apply for epistemic extensions of LTL and CTL. We also study the model-checking problem for these logics on systems satisfying the “no learning” property, introduced by Halpern and Vardi in their taxonomy of logics of knowledge and time, and we settle the complexity in almost all cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信