Jan Válek, Petr Kozlovcev, Anna Fialová, Kristýna Kotková, Dita Frankeová, Ivo Světlík, Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová
{"title":"有关放射性碳年代测定的灰泥中残留地质碳的评估","authors":"Jan Válek, Petr Kozlovcev, Anna Fialová, Kristýna Kotková, Dita Frankeová, Ivo Světlík, Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová","doi":"10.1017/rdc.2023.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quicklime samples were collected from six vertical layers (L1–L6) of a feedstock calcined in a traditional single-batch wood-fired kiln and assessed. Three samples were well-burned and three under-burned. The quicklime was slaked in an excess of water and the presence of unburned particles was investigated after settling it into putty. The putty was assessed as bulk and also at three depth levels. Thermal analysis determined the CO<span>2</span> residua in the quicklime samples. Cathodoluminescence detected individual unburned particles and image analysis was used for their quantification. Settling of the putties led to a considerable reduction of geogenic particles in the layers above the bottom. This was also confirmed by the stable isotope analysis. In the case of the putties made from well-burned quicklime, the δ<span>13</span>C values of samples L4 and L5 ranged from –25.5‰ to –20.5‰ VPDB, and the δ<span>18</span>O values ranged from –17.5‰ to –16.5‰ VPDB. The fractionation was likely affected by the division according to the particle size during the sedimentation. The results of the <span>14</span>C analysis correlate with the quantified percentage of cathodoluminescent particles.</p>","PeriodicalId":21020,"journal":{"name":"Radiocarbon","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUAL GEOGENIC CARBON IN MORTARS CONCERNING RADIOCARBON DATING\",\"authors\":\"Jan Válek, Petr Kozlovcev, Anna Fialová, Kristýna Kotková, Dita Frankeová, Ivo Světlík, Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/rdc.2023.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Quicklime samples were collected from six vertical layers (L1–L6) of a feedstock calcined in a traditional single-batch wood-fired kiln and assessed. Three samples were well-burned and three under-burned. The quicklime was slaked in an excess of water and the presence of unburned particles was investigated after settling it into putty. The putty was assessed as bulk and also at three depth levels. Thermal analysis determined the CO<span>2</span> residua in the quicklime samples. Cathodoluminescence detected individual unburned particles and image analysis was used for their quantification. Settling of the putties led to a considerable reduction of geogenic particles in the layers above the bottom. This was also confirmed by the stable isotope analysis. In the case of the putties made from well-burned quicklime, the δ<span>13</span>C values of samples L4 and L5 ranged from –25.5‰ to –20.5‰ VPDB, and the δ<span>18</span>O values ranged from –17.5‰ to –16.5‰ VPDB. The fractionation was likely affected by the division according to the particle size during the sedimentation. The results of the <span>14</span>C analysis correlate with the quantified percentage of cathodoluminescent particles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiocarbon\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiocarbon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/rdc.2023.81\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiocarbon","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rdc.2023.81","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUAL GEOGENIC CARBON IN MORTARS CONCERNING RADIOCARBON DATING
Quicklime samples were collected from six vertical layers (L1–L6) of a feedstock calcined in a traditional single-batch wood-fired kiln and assessed. Three samples were well-burned and three under-burned. The quicklime was slaked in an excess of water and the presence of unburned particles was investigated after settling it into putty. The putty was assessed as bulk and also at three depth levels. Thermal analysis determined the CO2 residua in the quicklime samples. Cathodoluminescence detected individual unburned particles and image analysis was used for their quantification. Settling of the putties led to a considerable reduction of geogenic particles in the layers above the bottom. This was also confirmed by the stable isotope analysis. In the case of the putties made from well-burned quicklime, the δ13C values of samples L4 and L5 ranged from –25.5‰ to –20.5‰ VPDB, and the δ18O values ranged from –17.5‰ to –16.5‰ VPDB. The fractionation was likely affected by the division according to the particle size during the sedimentation. The results of the 14C analysis correlate with the quantified percentage of cathodoluminescent particles.
期刊介绍:
Radiocarbon serves as the leading international journal for technical and interpretive articles, date lists, and advancements in 14C and other radioisotopes relevant to archaeological, geophysical, oceanographic, and related dating methods. Established in 1959, it has published numerous seminal works and hosts the triennial International Radiocarbon Conference proceedings. The journal also features occasional special issues. Submissions encompass regular articles such as research reports, technical descriptions, and date lists, along with comments, letters to the editor, book reviews, and laboratory lists.