探索私有化政策下中国农村近视儿童家长对眼科医疗服务的偏好:离散选择实验的证据

Wen Lin, Xiaodong Dong, Jack Hennessy, Junling Zhao, Xiaochen Ma
{"title":"探索私有化政策下中国农村近视儿童家长对眼科医疗服务的偏好:离散选择实验的证据","authors":"Wen Lin, Xiaodong Dong, Jack Hennessy, Junling Zhao, Xiaochen Ma","doi":"10.1007/s40271-023-00660-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aims to measure the preferences and valuations of parents of students with myopia parents for eye care service attributes in rural China, and to quantify the potential welfare impacts of privatization policy on children’s eye care services.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented among a sample of parents of children with myopia in rural China. We randomly selected 350 participants from the list of subjects obtained from local town schools and family doctors using a random number table method. The participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical scenarios defined by five attributes: provider type, distance, price, lenses type, and refractionists’ professional competencies. We estimate conditional logit and mixed logit models to approximate individual preferences for these attributes and estimate the welfare effects by calculating willingness to pay.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Respondents (<i>n</i> = 336) showed a significant preference for public providers of refractive error services, myopia control lenses, and professional refractionists (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01 for each). Consumer welfare losses due to a prohibition of the public provision of refractive error services could be compensated by improving the quality of products and services delivered by private providers. Lastly, both parent and child demographics and previous experience of eye care service consumption are important predictors of willingness to pay for refractive error services.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The privatization policy on children’s eye care services would not cater to the preferences of rural consumers, inevitably leading to welfare losses<i>.</i> However, reduced consumer welfare could be compensated by improving the quality of products and service delivery from private providers. These results could help inform strategies to improve and reduce inequities in access to high-quality eye care services in rural China.</p>","PeriodicalId":501651,"journal":{"name":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Preferences of Parents of Children with Myopia in Rural China for Eye Care Services Under Privatization Policy: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Wen Lin, Xiaodong Dong, Jack Hennessy, Junling Zhao, Xiaochen Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40271-023-00660-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aims to measure the preferences and valuations of parents of students with myopia parents for eye care service attributes in rural China, and to quantify the potential welfare impacts of privatization policy on children’s eye care services.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented among a sample of parents of children with myopia in rural China. We randomly selected 350 participants from the list of subjects obtained from local town schools and family doctors using a random number table method. The participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical scenarios defined by five attributes: provider type, distance, price, lenses type, and refractionists’ professional competencies. We estimate conditional logit and mixed logit models to approximate individual preferences for these attributes and estimate the welfare effects by calculating willingness to pay.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Respondents (<i>n</i> = 336) showed a significant preference for public providers of refractive error services, myopia control lenses, and professional refractionists (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01 for each). Consumer welfare losses due to a prohibition of the public provision of refractive error services could be compensated by improving the quality of products and services delivered by private providers. Lastly, both parent and child demographics and previous experience of eye care service consumption are important predictors of willingness to pay for refractive error services.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The privatization policy on children’s eye care services would not cater to the preferences of rural consumers, inevitably leading to welfare losses<i>.</i> However, reduced consumer welfare could be compensated by improving the quality of products and service delivery from private providers. These results could help inform strategies to improve and reduce inequities in access to high-quality eye care services in rural China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-023-00660-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-023-00660-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在测量中国农村近视学生家长对眼科医疗服务属性的偏好和评价,并量化民营化政策对儿童眼科医疗服务的潜在福利影响。方法在中国农村近视学生家长中设计并实施了离散选择实验。我们采用随机数字表法,从当地城镇学校和家庭医生处获得的受试者名单中随机抽取了 350 名参与者。受试者被要求在两种假设情景中做出选择,这两种情景由五个属性定义:医疗机构类型、距离、价格、镜片类型和屈光医生的专业能力。我们估算了条件 logit 模型和混合 logit 模型,以近似反映个人对这些属性的偏好,并通过计算支付意愿来估算福利效应。结果受访者(n = 336)对屈光不正服务、近视控制镜片和专业屈光医师的公共提供者表现出显著偏好(P 均为 0.01)。禁止公立机构提供屈光不正服务所造成的消费者福利损失,可以通过提高私立机构提供的产品和服务质量来弥补。最后,家长和儿童的人口统计学特征以及以往的眼保健服务消费经验都是预测屈光不正服务付费意愿的重要因素。然而,消费者福利的减少可以通过提高私营机构的产品质量和服务质量来弥补。这些结果有助于为改善和减少中国农村地区在获得高质量眼保健服务方面的不公平现象提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the Preferences of Parents of Children with Myopia in Rural China for Eye Care Services Under Privatization Policy: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Exploring the Preferences of Parents of Children with Myopia in Rural China for Eye Care Services Under Privatization Policy: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Objectives

This study aims to measure the preferences and valuations of parents of students with myopia parents for eye care service attributes in rural China, and to quantify the potential welfare impacts of privatization policy on children’s eye care services.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented among a sample of parents of children with myopia in rural China. We randomly selected 350 participants from the list of subjects obtained from local town schools and family doctors using a random number table method. The participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical scenarios defined by five attributes: provider type, distance, price, lenses type, and refractionists’ professional competencies. We estimate conditional logit and mixed logit models to approximate individual preferences for these attributes and estimate the welfare effects by calculating willingness to pay.

Results

Respondents (n = 336) showed a significant preference for public providers of refractive error services, myopia control lenses, and professional refractionists (P < 0.01 for each). Consumer welfare losses due to a prohibition of the public provision of refractive error services could be compensated by improving the quality of products and services delivered by private providers. Lastly, both parent and child demographics and previous experience of eye care service consumption are important predictors of willingness to pay for refractive error services.

Conclusions

The privatization policy on children’s eye care services would not cater to the preferences of rural consumers, inevitably leading to welfare losses. However, reduced consumer welfare could be compensated by improving the quality of products and service delivery from private providers. These results could help inform strategies to improve and reduce inequities in access to high-quality eye care services in rural China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信