儿童性虐待:男性和女性受害者的比较。

Francesco Lupariello, Barbara Lauria, Federica Mirri, Sonia Aguzzi, Emanuele Castagno, Claudia Bondone, Giancarlo Di Vella
{"title":"儿童性虐待:男性和女性受害者的比较。","authors":"Francesco Lupariello, Barbara Lauria, Federica Mirri, Sonia Aguzzi, Emanuele Castagno, Claudia Bondone, Giancarlo Di Vella","doi":"10.1097/paf.0000000000000902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the scientific literature, few authors deal with child sexual abuse (CSA) in boys. In addition, these authors debate this phenomenon in most available articles without statistically evaluating the occurrence of different or similar distributions of variables under sex. In light of the above, the authors compared multiple variables between female and male samples. The aim was to explore the characteristics of boys' CSA, identifying the main differences existing compared with the same phenomenon occurring in girls. The authors selected 2 samples for sex: group A, females; group B, males. The authors statistically compared the main variables between the 2 groups. The study yielded the following main results: the population was characterized by 607 children (476 were females-group A; 131 were males-group B); the variables' source of the referral and the type of anogenital findings were statistically significant. These data gave new insights into the CSA phenomenon. Because this study pointed out that sexual abuse does not have the same characteristics in boys and girls, researchers and safeguarding agencies should consider the abovementioned differences when planning preventive strategies against CSA.","PeriodicalId":501647,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child Sexual Abuse: Comparison of Male and Female Victims.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Lupariello, Barbara Lauria, Federica Mirri, Sonia Aguzzi, Emanuele Castagno, Claudia Bondone, Giancarlo Di Vella\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/paf.0000000000000902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the scientific literature, few authors deal with child sexual abuse (CSA) in boys. In addition, these authors debate this phenomenon in most available articles without statistically evaluating the occurrence of different or similar distributions of variables under sex. In light of the above, the authors compared multiple variables between female and male samples. The aim was to explore the characteristics of boys' CSA, identifying the main differences existing compared with the same phenomenon occurring in girls. The authors selected 2 samples for sex: group A, females; group B, males. The authors statistically compared the main variables between the 2 groups. The study yielded the following main results: the population was characterized by 607 children (476 were females-group A; 131 were males-group B); the variables' source of the referral and the type of anogenital findings were statistically significant. These data gave new insights into the CSA phenomenon. Because this study pointed out that sexual abuse does not have the same characteristics in boys and girls, researchers and safeguarding agencies should consider the abovementioned differences when planning preventive strategies against CSA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/paf.0000000000000902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/paf.0000000000000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学文献中,很少有作者涉及男童性虐待(CSA)问题。此外,这些作者在大多数现有文章中都对这一现象进行了辩论,但没有对性别下变量的不同或相似分布进行统计评估。有鉴于此,作者对女性和男性样本的多个变量进行了比较。目的是探索男孩 CSA 的特点,找出与女孩相同现象的主要差异。作者按性别选取了两个样本:A 组,女性;B 组,男性。作者对两组之间的主要变量进行了统计比较。研究得出以下主要结果:研究对象为 607 名儿童(476 名女性--A 组;131 名男性--B 组);转介来源和肛门生殖器检查结果类型这两个变量具有统计学意义。这些数据使人们对 CSA 现象有了新的认识。由于这项研究指出,性虐待在男孩和女孩身上并不具有相同的特征,因此研究人员和保护机构在规划预防 CSA 的策略时应考虑到上述差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Child Sexual Abuse: Comparison of Male and Female Victims.
In the scientific literature, few authors deal with child sexual abuse (CSA) in boys. In addition, these authors debate this phenomenon in most available articles without statistically evaluating the occurrence of different or similar distributions of variables under sex. In light of the above, the authors compared multiple variables between female and male samples. The aim was to explore the characteristics of boys' CSA, identifying the main differences existing compared with the same phenomenon occurring in girls. The authors selected 2 samples for sex: group A, females; group B, males. The authors statistically compared the main variables between the 2 groups. The study yielded the following main results: the population was characterized by 607 children (476 were females-group A; 131 were males-group B); the variables' source of the referral and the type of anogenital findings were statistically significant. These data gave new insights into the CSA phenomenon. Because this study pointed out that sexual abuse does not have the same characteristics in boys and girls, researchers and safeguarding agencies should consider the abovementioned differences when planning preventive strategies against CSA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信