仪式与大学教育：COVID-19 之后的系统共存

IF 1.8 4区管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1002/sres.2986

José-Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón

{"title":"仪式与大学教育：COVID-19 之后的系统共存","authors":"José-Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón","doi":"10.1002/sres.2986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the realm of university education after COVID-19, in which there is a perceived need to manage the ‘old’ and the ‘new’. The paper brings two different systems approaches to that end: the systems theory of autopoiesis and the systems identity technology of profilicity. In their own way, both explain the phenomena of ‘blindness’ to social situations, potentially enabling meaningful conversations to occur. However, they require a broader, common ground so that they could also coexist with each other. This could lead us to consider the inclusion of rituals in education. Two perspectives about ritual are brought forth to start developing such common ground. With these, the paper proposes a number of questions and implications to further develop systemic coexistence.","PeriodicalId":47538,"journal":{"name":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ritual and university education: Systemic coexistence after COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"José-Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sres.2986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the realm of university education after COVID-19, in which there is a perceived need to manage the ‘old’ and the ‘new’. The paper brings two different systems approaches to that end: the systems theory of autopoiesis and the systems identity technology of profilicity. In their own way, both explain the phenomena of ‘blindness’ to social situations, potentially enabling meaningful conversations to occur. However, they require a broader, common ground so that they could also coexist with each other. This could lead us to consider the inclusion of rituals in education. Two perspectives about ritual are brought forth to start developing such common ground. With these, the paper proposes a number of questions and implications to further develop systemic coexistence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了 COVID-19 之后的大学教育领域，在这一领域，人们认为有必要管理 "新 "与 "旧"。为此，本文采用了两种不同的系统方法：自生系统理论和系统特征技术。这两种方法都能以各自的方式解释对社会情境的 "盲从 "现象，从而有可能促成有意义的对话。然而，它们需要一个更广泛的共同点，这样才能共存。这可以引导我们考虑将仪式纳入教育。本文提出了两种关于仪式的观点，以着手建立这种共同基础。通过这些观点，本文提出了一些问题和影响，以进一步发展系统性共存。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ritual and university education: Systemic coexistence after COVID-19

This paper explores the realm of university education after COVID-19, in which there is a perceived need to manage the ‘old’ and the ‘new’. The paper brings two different systems approaches to that end: the systems theory of autopoiesis and the systems identity technology of profilicity. In their own way, both explain the phenomena of ‘blindness’ to social situations, potentially enabling meaningful conversations to occur. However, they require a broader, common ground so that they could also coexist with each other. This could lead us to consider the inclusion of rituals in education. Two perspectives about ritual are brought forth to start developing such common ground. With these, the paper proposes a number of questions and implications to further develop systemic coexistence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Multiple-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

14.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Systems Research and Behavioral Science publishes original articles on new theories, experimental research, and applications relating to all levels of living and non-living systems. Its scope is comprehensive, dealing with systems approaches to: the redesign of organisational and societal structures; the management of administrative and business processes; problems of change management; the implementation of procedures to increase the quality of work and life; the resolution of clashes of norms and values; social cognitive processes; modelling; the introduction of new scientific results, etc. The editors especially want manuscripts of a theoretical or empirical nature which have broad interdisciplinary implications not found in a journal devoted to a single discipline.